新时代媒体与印度教的起源

Q2 Arts and Humanities Quarterly Review of Film and Video Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1080/10509208.2022.2043097
Sunil Barthwal, Vipul Sharma
{"title":"新时代媒体与印度教的起源","authors":"Sunil Barthwal, Vipul Sharma","doi":"10.1080/10509208.2022.2043097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ali Abbas Zafar’s digital debut Tandav web series on Amazon Prime aired on 15 January 2021 (Zafar 2021) got engulfed in controversy for hurting the religious sentiments of Hindus and for derogatory caste-based remarks. Amazon Prime apologized unconditionally to its viewers for hurting public sentiments following 10 FIRs against Tandav (2021) for scenes that portrayed Hindu Gods in poor light and caste references (“Amazon Prime Apologises for Tandav: We Respect Our Viewers’ Diverse Beliefs and Apologise Unconditionally” 2021). The apology came after the Allahabad High Court refused the anticipatory bail plea to Aparna Purohit, the India content chief of Amazon Prime. Ali Abbas Zafar reiterated that the objectionable scenes were edited and removed from the series, as they respected the beliefs, religion, and values of all Indians. Yet, people could access the deleted scenes on social media (Movieflicks 2021). Many people who did not know about the web series logged on to YouTube and Instagram to see the deleted scenes and posted their comments. People compared the tolerance of respective religious groups in response to controversial media content. Virtual groups and communities on social media got created, in which people bitterly fought for their respective faiths. Tandav (Zafar 2021) was just another of the dozens of controversial media content that fueled the country’s debate on communal politics and witnessed protests and public disharmony. The web series is the latest, and perhaps one of the first OTT web streamed series to be caught in a controversy over inappropriate religious content and showing a Hindu God swearing on screen. Indian cinema has come a long way since","PeriodicalId":39016,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Review of Film and Video","volume":"40 1","pages":"702 - 724"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New-Age Media and the Genesis of Hindutva\",\"authors\":\"Sunil Barthwal, Vipul Sharma\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10509208.2022.2043097\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ali Abbas Zafar’s digital debut Tandav web series on Amazon Prime aired on 15 January 2021 (Zafar 2021) got engulfed in controversy for hurting the religious sentiments of Hindus and for derogatory caste-based remarks. Amazon Prime apologized unconditionally to its viewers for hurting public sentiments following 10 FIRs against Tandav (2021) for scenes that portrayed Hindu Gods in poor light and caste references (“Amazon Prime Apologises for Tandav: We Respect Our Viewers’ Diverse Beliefs and Apologise Unconditionally” 2021). The apology came after the Allahabad High Court refused the anticipatory bail plea to Aparna Purohit, the India content chief of Amazon Prime. Ali Abbas Zafar reiterated that the objectionable scenes were edited and removed from the series, as they respected the beliefs, religion, and values of all Indians. Yet, people could access the deleted scenes on social media (Movieflicks 2021). Many people who did not know about the web series logged on to YouTube and Instagram to see the deleted scenes and posted their comments. People compared the tolerance of respective religious groups in response to controversial media content. Virtual groups and communities on social media got created, in which people bitterly fought for their respective faiths. Tandav (Zafar 2021) was just another of the dozens of controversial media content that fueled the country’s debate on communal politics and witnessed protests and public disharmony. The web series is the latest, and perhaps one of the first OTT web streamed series to be caught in a controversy over inappropriate religious content and showing a Hindu God swearing on screen. Indian cinema has come a long way since\",\"PeriodicalId\":39016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quarterly Review of Film and Video\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"702 - 724\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quarterly Review of Film and Video\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10509208.2022.2043097\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Review of Film and Video","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10509208.2022.2043097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

Ali Abbas Zafar于2021年1月15日在亚马逊Prime上播出的数字首秀Tandav网络连续剧(Zafar 2021)因伤害印度教徒的宗教情绪和基于种姓的贬损言论而陷入争议。亚马逊Prime无条件地向观众道歉,因为10起针对Tandav(2021)的FIRs在光线不佳和种姓参考的情况下描绘印度教神的场景伤害了公众情绪(“亚马逊Prime为Tandav道歉:我们尊重观众的多样信仰,无条件地道歉”2021)。此前,阿拉哈巴德高等法院拒绝了亚马逊Prime印度内容主管Apana Purohit的预期保释请求。阿里·阿巴斯·扎法尔重申,这些令人反感的场景被编辑并从该系列中删除,因为它们尊重所有印度人的信仰、宗教和价值观。然而,人们可以在社交媒体上访问被删除的场景(Movieflicks 2021)。许多不知道这部网络连续剧的人登录YouTube和Instagram查看被删除的场景,并发表评论。人们比较了各自宗教团体对有争议的媒体内容的容忍度。社交媒体上的虚拟团体和社区应运而生,人们在其中为各自的信仰进行激烈的斗争。Tandav(Zafar 2021)只是数十个有争议的媒体内容中的另一个,这些内容引发了该国关于社区政治的辩论,并见证了抗议和公众不和谐。这部网络连续剧是最新的,也许也是第一部因不恰当的宗教内容和印度教上帝在屏幕上咒骂而陷入争议的OTT网络流媒体连续剧之一。自那以后,印度电影已经走过了漫长的道路
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
New-Age Media and the Genesis of Hindutva
Ali Abbas Zafar’s digital debut Tandav web series on Amazon Prime aired on 15 January 2021 (Zafar 2021) got engulfed in controversy for hurting the religious sentiments of Hindus and for derogatory caste-based remarks. Amazon Prime apologized unconditionally to its viewers for hurting public sentiments following 10 FIRs against Tandav (2021) for scenes that portrayed Hindu Gods in poor light and caste references (“Amazon Prime Apologises for Tandav: We Respect Our Viewers’ Diverse Beliefs and Apologise Unconditionally” 2021). The apology came after the Allahabad High Court refused the anticipatory bail plea to Aparna Purohit, the India content chief of Amazon Prime. Ali Abbas Zafar reiterated that the objectionable scenes were edited and removed from the series, as they respected the beliefs, religion, and values of all Indians. Yet, people could access the deleted scenes on social media (Movieflicks 2021). Many people who did not know about the web series logged on to YouTube and Instagram to see the deleted scenes and posted their comments. People compared the tolerance of respective religious groups in response to controversial media content. Virtual groups and communities on social media got created, in which people bitterly fought for their respective faiths. Tandav (Zafar 2021) was just another of the dozens of controversial media content that fueled the country’s debate on communal politics and witnessed protests and public disharmony. The web series is the latest, and perhaps one of the first OTT web streamed series to be caught in a controversy over inappropriate religious content and showing a Hindu God swearing on screen. Indian cinema has come a long way since
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Quarterly Review of Film and Video
Quarterly Review of Film and Video Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
期刊最新文献
Remaking Gender in the American Boxing Film: Masculinity and Femininity in Raging Bull and Million Dollar Baby Human, or Its Native Other? Peter Jackson’s King Kong (2005) as Tragic Romance Uncanny Reflections: Frenzy as Hitchcock’s Kaleidoscope Uncanny Reflections: Frenzy as Hitchcock’s Kaleidoscope Enclothed Cognition, White Solipsism, and Clothing Transition: A Study on Sanjay Leela Bhansali’s Gangubai Kathiawadi (2022)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1