思想之罪

IF 0.4 0 PHILOSOPHY Faith and Philosophy Pub Date : 2020-07-01 DOI:10.37977/FAITHPHIL.2020.37.3.1

M. Schroeder

{"title":"思想之罪","authors":"M. Schroeder","doi":"10.37977/FAITHPHIL.2020.37.3.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to the Book of Common Prayer, we have sinned against God “in thought, word, and deed.” In this paper I’ll explore one way of understanding what it might mean to sin against God in thought—the idea that we can at least potentially wrong God by what we believe. I will be interested in the philosophical tenability of this idea, and particularly in its potential consequences for the epistemology of religious belief and the problem of evil.","PeriodicalId":45294,"journal":{"name":"Faith and Philosophy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sins of Thought\",\"authors\":\"M. Schroeder\",\"doi\":\"10.37977/FAITHPHIL.2020.37.3.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"According to the Book of Common Prayer, we have sinned against God “in thought, word, and deed.” In this paper I’ll explore one way of understanding what it might mean to sin against God in thought—the idea that we can at least potentially wrong God by what we believe. I will be interested in the philosophical tenability of this idea, and particularly in its potential consequences for the epistemology of religious belief and the problem of evil.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Faith and Philosophy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Faith and Philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37977/FAITHPHIL.2020.37.3.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Faith and Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37977/FAITHPHIL.2020.37.3.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

摘要

根据《公祷书》(Book of Common Prayer)，我们“在思想、言语和行为上”都得罪了上帝。在这篇文章中，我将探索一种理解在思想上得罪上帝的方式，即我们至少可以通过我们的信仰来潜在地得罪上帝。我将对这一观点的哲学站得住脚感兴趣，尤其是它对宗教信仰认识论和邪恶问题的潜在影响。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Sins of Thought

According to the Book of Common Prayer, we have sinned against God “in thought, word, and deed.” In this paper I’ll explore one way of understanding what it might mean to sin against God in thought—the idea that we can at least potentially wrong God by what we believe. I will be interested in the philosophical tenability of this idea, and particularly in its potential consequences for the epistemology of religious belief and the problem of evil.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Faith and Philosophy Multiple-

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊最新文献

Heavenly Procreation The Value of a Meaningful Life as a Response to the Problem of Evil Luis R.G. Oliveira and Kevin J. Corcoran, eds., Common Sense Metaphysics: Essays in Honor of Lynne Rudder Baker Tobias Hoffmann, Free Will and the Rebel Angels in Medieval Philosophy Reading Anselm's Natural Theology Through a Palamite Lens