收益剥离规则的评估

Pub Date : 2020-09-01 DOI:10.54648/ecta2020044
S. Stevens
{"title":"收益剥离规则的评估","authors":"S. Stevens","doi":"10.54648/ecta2020044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Member States had to have implemented the anti-earnings stripping rules by 1 January 2019. In this article these rules are evaluated from an economic and EU law perspective. The author concludes that the rules are probably not in breach of EU law because they are implemented without distinction between domestic and cross border situations. In addition there is little room to assess rules which are the result of (full) harmonization. Nevertheless some risks exist in particular with regard to the interaction between the group regimes and the earning stripping rules and the design of the standalone exception. An important drawback of the earnings stripping rules is the risk of double taxation. This could have been avoided by the EU legislator.\nEarnings stripping rules, EBITDA, interest, thin capitalization rules, manifest error, ATAD-Directive, Equity escape, BEPS, Minimum standard","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the Earnings Stripping Rules\",\"authors\":\"S. Stevens\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/ecta2020044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Member States had to have implemented the anti-earnings stripping rules by 1 January 2019. In this article these rules are evaluated from an economic and EU law perspective. The author concludes that the rules are probably not in breach of EU law because they are implemented without distinction between domestic and cross border situations. In addition there is little room to assess rules which are the result of (full) harmonization. Nevertheless some risks exist in particular with regard to the interaction between the group regimes and the earning stripping rules and the design of the standalone exception. An important drawback of the earnings stripping rules is the risk of double taxation. This could have been avoided by the EU legislator.\\nEarnings stripping rules, EBITDA, interest, thin capitalization rules, manifest error, ATAD-Directive, Equity escape, BEPS, Minimum standard\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/ecta2020044\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/ecta2020044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

成员国必须在2019年1月1日之前实施反收入剥离规则。本文从经济和欧盟法律的角度对这些规则进行了评估。提交人的结论是,这些规则可能没有违反欧盟法律,因为它们的实施没有区分国内和跨境情况。此外,评估规则的空间很小,这些规则是(完全)协调的结果。然而,存在一些风险,特别是在集团制度与收入剥离规则之间的相互作用以及独立例外的设计方面。收益剥离规则的一个重要缺点是双重征税的风险。欧盟立法者本可以避免这种情况。收益剥离规则、息税折旧摊销前利润、利息、资本弱化规则、明显错误、ATAD指令、股权逃避、BEPS、最低标准
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
Evaluation of the Earnings Stripping Rules
Member States had to have implemented the anti-earnings stripping rules by 1 January 2019. In this article these rules are evaluated from an economic and EU law perspective. The author concludes that the rules are probably not in breach of EU law because they are implemented without distinction between domestic and cross border situations. In addition there is little room to assess rules which are the result of (full) harmonization. Nevertheless some risks exist in particular with regard to the interaction between the group regimes and the earning stripping rules and the design of the standalone exception. An important drawback of the earnings stripping rules is the risk of double taxation. This could have been avoided by the EU legislator. Earnings stripping rules, EBITDA, interest, thin capitalization rules, manifest error, ATAD-Directive, Equity escape, BEPS, Minimum standard
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1