学术权利及其潜在的教育后果:范围界定综述

B. Kinne, M. Goehring, Betsy Lee Williams
{"title":"学术权利及其潜在的教育后果:范围界定综述","authors":"B. Kinne, M. Goehring, Betsy Lee Williams","doi":"10.1097/JTE.0000000000000231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Purpose. In 2020, the first and only study to investigate academic entitlement in doctor of physical therapy (DPT) students was published. In the review of literature section of the study, the authors alluded to the premise that academic entitlement seems to be directly related to several educational consequences. The purpose of this scoping review was to determine what educational consequences may result from increased academic entitlement, especially as they relate to DPT students. Methods. A scoping review was conducted to systematically identify what is known about the correlation between academic entitlement and its educational consequences. The scoping review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. Results. A total of 25 studies were included in the scoping review. For ease of interpretation, the authors organized the statistically significant findings into content areas composed of learning processes related to academic confidence, learning processes related to academic preferences, learning outcomes related to self, and learning outcomes related to others. Discussion and Conclusion. This scoping review determined that several educational consequences may result from increased academic entitlement. A few of the educational factors related to increased academic entitlement also led to adverse personal consequences for both students and their faculty members. Future research should include a review that determines all the possible causes of increased academic entitlement. This information would be beneficial to instructors involved in all levels of education, including faculty members employed in a DPT program.","PeriodicalId":91351,"journal":{"name":"Journal, physical therapy education","volume":"36 1","pages":"115 - 121"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Academic Entitlement and Its Potential Educational Consequences: A Scoping Review\",\"authors\":\"B. Kinne, M. Goehring, Betsy Lee Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JTE.0000000000000231\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and Purpose. In 2020, the first and only study to investigate academic entitlement in doctor of physical therapy (DPT) students was published. In the review of literature section of the study, the authors alluded to the premise that academic entitlement seems to be directly related to several educational consequences. The purpose of this scoping review was to determine what educational consequences may result from increased academic entitlement, especially as they relate to DPT students. Methods. A scoping review was conducted to systematically identify what is known about the correlation between academic entitlement and its educational consequences. The scoping review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. Results. A total of 25 studies were included in the scoping review. For ease of interpretation, the authors organized the statistically significant findings into content areas composed of learning processes related to academic confidence, learning processes related to academic preferences, learning outcomes related to self, and learning outcomes related to others. Discussion and Conclusion. This scoping review determined that several educational consequences may result from increased academic entitlement. A few of the educational factors related to increased academic entitlement also led to adverse personal consequences for both students and their faculty members. Future research should include a review that determines all the possible causes of increased academic entitlement. This information would be beneficial to instructors involved in all levels of education, including faculty members employed in a DPT program.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91351,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal, physical therapy education\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"115 - 121\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal, physical therapy education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JTE.0000000000000231\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal, physical therapy education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JTE.0000000000000231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景和目的。2020年,第一项也是唯一一项调查物理治疗博士(DPT)学生学术权利的研究发表。在研究的文献综述部分,作者暗示了学术权利似乎与几个教育后果直接相关的前提。这项范围审查的目的是确定学术权利增加可能导致的教育后果,特别是与DPT学生有关的教育后果。方法。进行了范围审查,以系统地确定学术权利与其教育后果之间的相关性。范围审查遵循系统审查的首选报告项目和范围审查清单的元分析扩展。结果。范围审查共纳入了25项研究。为了便于解释,作者将统计上显著的研究结果分为与学习自信相关的学习过程、与学习偏好相关的学习过程、与自我相关的学习结果和与他人相关的学习结果。讨论与结论。这项范围审查确定,增加学术权利可能会导致一些教育后果。与学术权利增加有关的一些教育因素也导致了对学生和教师不利的个人后果。未来的研究应包括一项审查,以确定增加学术权利的所有可能原因。这些信息将有利于参与各级教育的教师,包括在DPT项目中雇用的教员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Academic Entitlement and Its Potential Educational Consequences: A Scoping Review
Background and Purpose. In 2020, the first and only study to investigate academic entitlement in doctor of physical therapy (DPT) students was published. In the review of literature section of the study, the authors alluded to the premise that academic entitlement seems to be directly related to several educational consequences. The purpose of this scoping review was to determine what educational consequences may result from increased academic entitlement, especially as they relate to DPT students. Methods. A scoping review was conducted to systematically identify what is known about the correlation between academic entitlement and its educational consequences. The scoping review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. Results. A total of 25 studies were included in the scoping review. For ease of interpretation, the authors organized the statistically significant findings into content areas composed of learning processes related to academic confidence, learning processes related to academic preferences, learning outcomes related to self, and learning outcomes related to others. Discussion and Conclusion. This scoping review determined that several educational consequences may result from increased academic entitlement. A few of the educational factors related to increased academic entitlement also led to adverse personal consequences for both students and their faculty members. Future research should include a review that determines all the possible causes of increased academic entitlement. This information would be beneficial to instructors involved in all levels of education, including faculty members employed in a DPT program.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessment of Gender Differences in Letters of Recommendation for Physical Therapy Residency Applications. Do We Make a Difference? The Effect of a Doctor of Physical Therapy Program Curriculum on Student Cultural Competence. Student Pedagogical Consultants: A Strategy for Increasing Diversity, Equity, Inclusivity, and a Sense of Belonging in Curricular Approaches in Physical Therapist Education. Influencing Physical Therapist's Self-efficacy for Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Through Blended Learning: A Mixed Methods Study. A Continuous Quality Improvement Framework for Sustainable Action and Advancement of Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Belonging in Physical Therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1