Anita Skandarajah, M. Bozin, J. Callahan, E. Drummond, M. Henderson
{"title":"基于肿瘤患者标准摄取值预测FDG密集型甲状腺结节的恶性肿瘤","authors":"Anita Skandarajah, M. Bozin, J. Callahan, E. Drummond, M. Henderson","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10002-1409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"determine if maximum standardized uptake value (SUV-max), representing the maximum uptake of 18-FDG, used a surrogate Aim and objective: Concomitant thyroid nodules and cancer found incidentally on 18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron-emission tomography (PET-CT) in patients imaged for investigation or staging of malignancy have been progressively encountered. Maximum SUV (SUV-max) may aid diagnosis of concomitant thyroid malignancy. Materials and methods: PET/CT scans were reviewed between 2009 and 2014 in which FDG-avid thyroid incidentalomas were included. Patients who were investigated with biopsy or surgery were further assessed to determine the utility of SUV-max, mean, and nodule size as a determinate of malignancy. Results: A total of 325 of 35,586 patients were identified with FDG-avid thyroid incidentalomas (TI)–99 were investigated. The incidence was 0.88%. Forty nine were malignant, with a median SUV-max of 14.5 (range 2.7–60.4). Malignant nodules had higher median SUV-max than benign nodules at a threshold of 5 ( p < 0.0001). Receiver operator curve (ROC) analysis demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.66 (95%CI 0.55–0.77, p = 0.005). The sensitivity and specificity were 73.4 and 46.9, respectively. The positive and negative likelihood ratio was 3.12 (95%CI 1.80–5.50) and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.38. Conclusion: As FDG-avid TI can demonstrate variable uptake, SUV-max is not a useful tool to discriminate benign from malignant TI. SUV-max should remain a theoretical adjunctive tool for predicting thyroid cancer. Clinical significance: The threshold for investigating PET-avid thyroid nodules with ultrasound and FNAC (in the context of primary nonthyroidal malignancy) should be determined by the prognosis of the primary malignancy.","PeriodicalId":53556,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Endocrine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting Malignancy in FDG-avid Thyroid Nodules based on Standardized Uptake Value in Oncology Patients\",\"authors\":\"Anita Skandarajah, M. Bozin, J. Callahan, E. Drummond, M. Henderson\",\"doi\":\"10.5005/jp-journals-10002-1409\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"determine if maximum standardized uptake value (SUV-max), representing the maximum uptake of 18-FDG, used a surrogate Aim and objective: Concomitant thyroid nodules and cancer found incidentally on 18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron-emission tomography (PET-CT) in patients imaged for investigation or staging of malignancy have been progressively encountered. Maximum SUV (SUV-max) may aid diagnosis of concomitant thyroid malignancy. Materials and methods: PET/CT scans were reviewed between 2009 and 2014 in which FDG-avid thyroid incidentalomas were included. Patients who were investigated with biopsy or surgery were further assessed to determine the utility of SUV-max, mean, and nodule size as a determinate of malignancy. Results: A total of 325 of 35,586 patients were identified with FDG-avid thyroid incidentalomas (TI)–99 were investigated. The incidence was 0.88%. Forty nine were malignant, with a median SUV-max of 14.5 (range 2.7–60.4). Malignant nodules had higher median SUV-max than benign nodules at a threshold of 5 ( p < 0.0001). Receiver operator curve (ROC) analysis demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.66 (95%CI 0.55–0.77, p = 0.005). The sensitivity and specificity were 73.4 and 46.9, respectively. The positive and negative likelihood ratio was 3.12 (95%CI 1.80–5.50) and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.38. Conclusion: As FDG-avid TI can demonstrate variable uptake, SUV-max is not a useful tool to discriminate benign from malignant TI. SUV-max should remain a theoretical adjunctive tool for predicting thyroid cancer. Clinical significance: The threshold for investigating PET-avid thyroid nodules with ultrasound and FNAC (in the context of primary nonthyroidal malignancy) should be determined by the prognosis of the primary malignancy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53556,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Endocrine Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Endocrine Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10002-1409\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Endocrine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10002-1409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Predicting Malignancy in FDG-avid Thyroid Nodules based on Standardized Uptake Value in Oncology Patients
determine if maximum standardized uptake value (SUV-max), representing the maximum uptake of 18-FDG, used a surrogate Aim and objective: Concomitant thyroid nodules and cancer found incidentally on 18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron-emission tomography (PET-CT) in patients imaged for investigation or staging of malignancy have been progressively encountered. Maximum SUV (SUV-max) may aid diagnosis of concomitant thyroid malignancy. Materials and methods: PET/CT scans were reviewed between 2009 and 2014 in which FDG-avid thyroid incidentalomas were included. Patients who were investigated with biopsy or surgery were further assessed to determine the utility of SUV-max, mean, and nodule size as a determinate of malignancy. Results: A total of 325 of 35,586 patients were identified with FDG-avid thyroid incidentalomas (TI)–99 were investigated. The incidence was 0.88%. Forty nine were malignant, with a median SUV-max of 14.5 (range 2.7–60.4). Malignant nodules had higher median SUV-max than benign nodules at a threshold of 5 ( p < 0.0001). Receiver operator curve (ROC) analysis demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.66 (95%CI 0.55–0.77, p = 0.005). The sensitivity and specificity were 73.4 and 46.9, respectively. The positive and negative likelihood ratio was 3.12 (95%CI 1.80–5.50) and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.38. Conclusion: As FDG-avid TI can demonstrate variable uptake, SUV-max is not a useful tool to discriminate benign from malignant TI. SUV-max should remain a theoretical adjunctive tool for predicting thyroid cancer. Clinical significance: The threshold for investigating PET-avid thyroid nodules with ultrasound and FNAC (in the context of primary nonthyroidal malignancy) should be determined by the prognosis of the primary malignancy.