向正确方向迈进:金融咨询中的客户关系

K. Hunt, Mark A. Brimble, B. Freudenberg
{"title":"向正确方向迈进:金融咨询中的客户关系","authors":"K. Hunt, Mark A. Brimble, B. Freudenberg","doi":"10.3905/jwm.2022.1.167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Australian financial advice industry continues to be the subject of ongoing regulatory reform largely driven by persistent failures of advice and products. Despite these concerns, many Australian consumers continue to have productive, effective, and high-quality relationships with their financial adviser. This article seeks to understand the determinants of quality in these relationships both contemporaneously and how this has changed over time. Deploying a research instrument used in a study in 2009, we compare and contrast the views of practitioners and clients both with updated data and over time. We find once again that systematic differences in the perceptions of professional-client relationship quality exist. We find that these perceptions have changed over time, with high-wealth clients’ perceptions differing from those of other clients, just as the perceptions of more highly educated financial advisers differ from those of advisers with less education. Overall, relationship quality has increased over a number of dimensions.","PeriodicalId":39998,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wealth Management","volume":"25 1","pages":"50 - 81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Move in the Right Direction: Client Relationships in Financial Advice\",\"authors\":\"K. Hunt, Mark A. Brimble, B. Freudenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.3905/jwm.2022.1.167\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Australian financial advice industry continues to be the subject of ongoing regulatory reform largely driven by persistent failures of advice and products. Despite these concerns, many Australian consumers continue to have productive, effective, and high-quality relationships with their financial adviser. This article seeks to understand the determinants of quality in these relationships both contemporaneously and how this has changed over time. Deploying a research instrument used in a study in 2009, we compare and contrast the views of practitioners and clients both with updated data and over time. We find once again that systematic differences in the perceptions of professional-client relationship quality exist. We find that these perceptions have changed over time, with high-wealth clients’ perceptions differing from those of other clients, just as the perceptions of more highly educated financial advisers differ from those of advisers with less education. Overall, relationship quality has increased over a number of dimensions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39998,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Wealth Management\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"50 - 81\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Wealth Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3905/jwm.2022.1.167\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wealth Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jwm.2022.1.167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

澳大利亚金融咨询行业仍然是正在进行的监管改革的主题,主要是由于咨询和产品的持续失败。尽管存在这些担忧,许多澳大利亚消费者仍然与他们的财务顾问保持着富有成效、高效和高质量的关系。这篇文章试图了解这些关系中质量的决定因素,同时也是如何随着时间的推移而变化的。部署2009年一项研究中使用的研究工具,我们将从业者和客户的观点与更新的数据和一段时间的推移进行比较和对比。我们再次发现,对专业客户关系质量的认知存在系统性差异。我们发现,随着时间的推移,这些看法发生了变化,高财富客户的看法与其他客户的看法不同,就像受过高等教育的财务顾问的看法与受过较少教育的顾问的看法不同一样。总体而言,关系质量在许多方面都有所提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Move in the Right Direction: Client Relationships in Financial Advice
The Australian financial advice industry continues to be the subject of ongoing regulatory reform largely driven by persistent failures of advice and products. Despite these concerns, many Australian consumers continue to have productive, effective, and high-quality relationships with their financial adviser. This article seeks to understand the determinants of quality in these relationships both contemporaneously and how this has changed over time. Deploying a research instrument used in a study in 2009, we compare and contrast the views of practitioners and clients both with updated data and over time. We find once again that systematic differences in the perceptions of professional-client relationship quality exist. We find that these perceptions have changed over time, with high-wealth clients’ perceptions differing from those of other clients, just as the perceptions of more highly educated financial advisers differ from those of advisers with less education. Overall, relationship quality has increased over a number of dimensions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Wealth Management
Journal of Wealth Management Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
The Safe-Haven and Hedging Properties of Agricultural Commodities Editor’s Letter Adding Art to Your Portfolio: A New Risk Assessment Framework Corporate Ownership of Fine Art: Firm Valuation, Societal Impacts, and Philanthropy Asset Allocation—Commodities or Commodity Stocks?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1