DIS/能力研究:一项非个性化的建议,以批判性地质疑身体的生产-残疾主体

Laura Sanmiquel-Molinero
{"title":"DIS/能力研究:一项非个性化的建议,以批判性地质疑身体的生产-残疾主体","authors":"Laura Sanmiquel-Molinero","doi":"10.1387/PCEIC.20974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to promote the dialogue between Spanish and Anglo-Saxon perspectives that are critical of individual models of disability. Also, the paper seeks to bridge these approaches and qualitative research. Specifically, I claim that Dis/ability Studies (D/aS) are a well-suited approach to ground this field of inquiry. This emergent perspective explores the \"dis/ability complex\" from an intersectional stance. That is, the way in which attributes linked to ability and disability are mutually constitutive, and simultaneously reproduced by disablism and ableism as well as other systems of social differentiation. This work advances twelve research questions that derive from D/aS and two of their theoretical foundations (poststructuralism and postconventionalism). Drawing on poststructuralism, I conceptualise disability as a foucaultian apparatus the ableist regime of intelligibility of which is shaped by individual models of disability. On the other hand, postconventional theories such as posthumanism and theories of affect allow us to explore the material and affective assemblages that corporealise the disabled subject, reproducing and/or subverting the disability apparatus. I conclude by pointing out that ‘ableism’ and ‘disablism’ can further the debate between theoretical and activist fields beyond ‘disability’.","PeriodicalId":41605,"journal":{"name":"Papeles del CEIC-International Journal on Collective Identity Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Los Estudios de la Dis/capacidad: una propuesta no individualizante para interrogar críticamente la producción del cuerpo-sujeto discapacitado\",\"authors\":\"Laura Sanmiquel-Molinero\",\"doi\":\"10.1387/PCEIC.20974\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper aims to promote the dialogue between Spanish and Anglo-Saxon perspectives that are critical of individual models of disability. Also, the paper seeks to bridge these approaches and qualitative research. Specifically, I claim that Dis/ability Studies (D/aS) are a well-suited approach to ground this field of inquiry. This emergent perspective explores the \\\"dis/ability complex\\\" from an intersectional stance. That is, the way in which attributes linked to ability and disability are mutually constitutive, and simultaneously reproduced by disablism and ableism as well as other systems of social differentiation. This work advances twelve research questions that derive from D/aS and two of their theoretical foundations (poststructuralism and postconventionalism). Drawing on poststructuralism, I conceptualise disability as a foucaultian apparatus the ableist regime of intelligibility of which is shaped by individual models of disability. On the other hand, postconventional theories such as posthumanism and theories of affect allow us to explore the material and affective assemblages that corporealise the disabled subject, reproducing and/or subverting the disability apparatus. I conclude by pointing out that ‘ableism’ and ‘disablism’ can further the debate between theoretical and activist fields beyond ‘disability’.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41605,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Papeles del CEIC-International Journal on Collective Identity Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Papeles del CEIC-International Journal on Collective Identity Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1387/PCEIC.20974\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL ISSUES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Papeles del CEIC-International Journal on Collective Identity Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1387/PCEIC.20974","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文旨在促进西班牙和盎格鲁撒克逊观点之间的对话,这些观点对残疾的个人模式持批评态度。此外,本文试图将这些方法与定性研究联系起来。具体地说,我声称不合格性研究(D/aS)是一种非常适合为这一研究领域奠定基础的方法。这一新兴视角从交叉的角度探讨了“能力缺陷情结”。也就是说,与能力和残疾相关的属性是相互构成的,同时由残疾和能力主义以及其他社会分化系统复制。这项工作提出了十二个衍生自D/aS的研究问题及其两个理论基础(后结构主义和后惯例主义)。在后结构主义的基础上,我将残疾概念化为一种福考尔式的机器,其可理解性的能人制度是由残疾的个体模型塑造的。另一方面,后人文主义和情感理论等后传统理论使我们能够探索将残疾主体实体化、复制和/或颠覆残疾机器的物质和情感组合。最后,我指出,“能力主义”和“残疾主义”可以进一步推动“残疾”之外的理论和活动家领域之间的辩论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Los Estudios de la Dis/capacidad: una propuesta no individualizante para interrogar críticamente la producción del cuerpo-sujeto discapacitado
This paper aims to promote the dialogue between Spanish and Anglo-Saxon perspectives that are critical of individual models of disability. Also, the paper seeks to bridge these approaches and qualitative research. Specifically, I claim that Dis/ability Studies (D/aS) are a well-suited approach to ground this field of inquiry. This emergent perspective explores the "dis/ability complex" from an intersectional stance. That is, the way in which attributes linked to ability and disability are mutually constitutive, and simultaneously reproduced by disablism and ableism as well as other systems of social differentiation. This work advances twelve research questions that derive from D/aS and two of their theoretical foundations (poststructuralism and postconventionalism). Drawing on poststructuralism, I conceptualise disability as a foucaultian apparatus the ableist regime of intelligibility of which is shaped by individual models of disability. On the other hand, postconventional theories such as posthumanism and theories of affect allow us to explore the material and affective assemblages that corporealise the disabled subject, reproducing and/or subverting the disability apparatus. I conclude by pointing out that ‘ableism’ and ‘disablism’ can further the debate between theoretical and activist fields beyond ‘disability’.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Los corretiados y la casa prometida Hu, Guan (2020). Los 800. Película Santiago, Jose (Ed.) (2021). Caras y soportes de la vulnerabilidad. Madrid: Catarata Cuidado e identidad Cómo trabajar la identidad en los estudios de acción colectiva: una propuesta
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1