走向后殖民主义的跨性别政治

IF 1.8 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Critical Studies on Security Pub Date : 2021-09-02 DOI:10.1080/21624887.2021.2008384
B. Camminga
{"title":"走向后殖民主义的跨性别政治","authors":"B. Camminga","doi":"10.1080/21624887.2021.2008384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rahul Rao’s Out of Time: The Queer Politics of Post-Coloniality was one of my lockdown reads. As such I arrived at its pages in the same way I think many have since the moment of its publication: with a desperate desire for distraction and engagement. And it delivered. As many other readers and respondents have already noted, this book is written with immense care, generous thinking, and intellectual curiosity. It does the incredible theoretical melding and mixing that many scholars who are working from and thinking with projects in the Global South (myself included) prize. That is, centring the Global South while deftly tacking from the local to the global and back again. In doing so, one of the critical offerings Out of Time makes is troubling the narrative that has, seemingly, so easily become the hill on which debates and political organising regarding African sexualities have come to sacrifice themselves. A narrative that hinges on the question: what is unAfrican? Homophobia or homosexuality? Which of these is the culturally inauthentic interloper? Drawing on Uganda to provide a crucial example of the discursive constructions of homophobia and how this debate about so-called ‘unAfricaness’ unfolds in myriad directions, Out of Time not only notes the inconsistencies in this debate, but also does some hefty lifting in linking this debate to a global flow of people, capital, ideas and terms between fonrmer colonies and the colonial metropole. As part of this global flow, I write this response, in South Africa, on a public holiday – Freedom Day. It is a cruel reminder of how far we have yet to go that on the day before Freedom Day, queer and trans South Africans, across the country and despite COVID-19, felt it deeply necessary to march and gather publicly for two reasons. The first, a call to end what is being termed a ‘wave of hate crimes’ targeting queer and trans people after the brutal murders of Bonang Gaelae, Nonhlanhla Kunene, Lonwabo Jack, Lulu Ntuthela, Nathaniel Spokgoane Mbele, Khulekani Gomazi and Sphamandla Khoza. There will be three more names added to this list in the days to come. The second was to show solidarity with queer and trans refugees, predominantly from Uganda, a group who are quite clearly the outcome of some of the developments Out of Time sketches, living in Kakuma refugee camp, Kenya. This is in the wake of an arson attack that left one member of that community dead and several others severely injured. Unfortunately, much like in South Africa, there will be more violence, neglect and abjection in the days to come. Both of these events read to me as indicative of the ways that the underpinnings of the debate regarding ‘unAfricaness’ continue to inform conditions of life and death for those living on the African continent recognised or cast as queer. In this way, these events are very much linked to this discussion about what kinds of queer politics become possible in the aftermath of colonialism. Out of Time points to the coloniality of postcolonial African states in not only vehemently upholding laws that criminalise queer and trans people but in some cases, as with the Ugandan example, reinventing and re-inscribing those laws in terms far harsher than previously. Rao suggests that, in the scramble to say that ‘homophobia is a colonial import’, there has been a","PeriodicalId":29930,"journal":{"name":"Critical Studies on Security","volume":"9 1","pages":"246 - 249"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards a trans politics of post-coloniality\",\"authors\":\"B. Camminga\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21624887.2021.2008384\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Rahul Rao’s Out of Time: The Queer Politics of Post-Coloniality was one of my lockdown reads. As such I arrived at its pages in the same way I think many have since the moment of its publication: with a desperate desire for distraction and engagement. And it delivered. As many other readers and respondents have already noted, this book is written with immense care, generous thinking, and intellectual curiosity. It does the incredible theoretical melding and mixing that many scholars who are working from and thinking with projects in the Global South (myself included) prize. That is, centring the Global South while deftly tacking from the local to the global and back again. In doing so, one of the critical offerings Out of Time makes is troubling the narrative that has, seemingly, so easily become the hill on which debates and political organising regarding African sexualities have come to sacrifice themselves. A narrative that hinges on the question: what is unAfrican? Homophobia or homosexuality? Which of these is the culturally inauthentic interloper? Drawing on Uganda to provide a crucial example of the discursive constructions of homophobia and how this debate about so-called ‘unAfricaness’ unfolds in myriad directions, Out of Time not only notes the inconsistencies in this debate, but also does some hefty lifting in linking this debate to a global flow of people, capital, ideas and terms between fonrmer colonies and the colonial metropole. As part of this global flow, I write this response, in South Africa, on a public holiday – Freedom Day. It is a cruel reminder of how far we have yet to go that on the day before Freedom Day, queer and trans South Africans, across the country and despite COVID-19, felt it deeply necessary to march and gather publicly for two reasons. The first, a call to end what is being termed a ‘wave of hate crimes’ targeting queer and trans people after the brutal murders of Bonang Gaelae, Nonhlanhla Kunene, Lonwabo Jack, Lulu Ntuthela, Nathaniel Spokgoane Mbele, Khulekani Gomazi and Sphamandla Khoza. There will be three more names added to this list in the days to come. The second was to show solidarity with queer and trans refugees, predominantly from Uganda, a group who are quite clearly the outcome of some of the developments Out of Time sketches, living in Kakuma refugee camp, Kenya. This is in the wake of an arson attack that left one member of that community dead and several others severely injured. Unfortunately, much like in South Africa, there will be more violence, neglect and abjection in the days to come. Both of these events read to me as indicative of the ways that the underpinnings of the debate regarding ‘unAfricaness’ continue to inform conditions of life and death for those living on the African continent recognised or cast as queer. In this way, these events are very much linked to this discussion about what kinds of queer politics become possible in the aftermath of colonialism. Out of Time points to the coloniality of postcolonial African states in not only vehemently upholding laws that criminalise queer and trans people but in some cases, as with the Ugandan example, reinventing and re-inscribing those laws in terms far harsher than previously. Rao suggests that, in the scramble to say that ‘homophobia is a colonial import’, there has been a\",\"PeriodicalId\":29930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Studies on Security\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"246 - 249\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Studies on Security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21624887.2021.2008384\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Studies on Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21624887.2021.2008384","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

拉胡尔·拉奥(Rahul Rao)的《不合时宜:后殖民主义的酷儿政治》(Out of Time:The Queer Politics of Post Coloniality)是我在封锁期间阅读的一本书。因此,我对它的阅读方式与我认为自它出版以来许多人的阅读方式相同:渴望分心和参与。它实现了。正如许多其他读者和受访者已经注意到的那样,这本书是以极大的谨慎、慷慨的思考和求知欲写成的。它实现了令人难以置信的理论融合和融合,许多正在全球南方研究和思考项目的学者(包括我自己)都获得了该奖项。也就是说,以全球南方为中心,同时巧妙地从当地转移到全球,然后再返回。在这样做的过程中,《不合时宜》的一个关键贡献是让叙事变得不安,这种叙事似乎很容易成为关于非洲性取向的辩论和政治组织牺牲自己的山。一种基于以下问题的叙述:什么是非非洲人?恐同还是同性恋?以下哪一个是文化上不真实的闯入者?《不合时宜》利用乌干达提供了一个重要的例子,说明恐同症的话语结构,以及这场关于所谓“非非洲性”的辩论是如何向无数方向展开的,它不仅注意到了这场辩论中的不一致之处,而且在将这场辩论与全球人口、资本、,殖民地和殖民地大都市之间的思想和术语。作为这一全球流动的一部分,我在南非的一个公共假日——自由日写下了这篇回应。这残酷地提醒我们,在自由日的前一天,尽管新冠肺炎肆虐,但全国各地的酷儿和跨性别南非人都觉得有必要公开游行和集会,原因有两个。第一,在博南·盖莱、农赫拉·库内内、朗瓦博·杰克、卢鲁·恩图塞拉、纳撒尼尔·斯波戈恩·姆贝莱、胡莱卡尼·戈马齐和斯曼德拉·科扎被残忍谋杀后,呼吁结束针对酷儿和跨性别者的所谓“仇恨犯罪浪潮”。在未来的日子里,这个名单还会增加三个名字。第二个是声援酷儿和跨性别难民,他们主要来自乌干达,这一群体显然是一些发展的结果,他们生活在肯尼亚的卡库马难民营。这是在一次纵火袭击之后发生的,该袭击导致该社区一名成员死亡,数人重伤。不幸的是,就像在南非一样,在未来的日子里,将会有更多的暴力、忽视和唾弃。在我看来,这两件事都表明,关于“非非洲性”的辩论的基础继续为生活在非洲大陆的人们的生死状况提供信息。通过这种方式,这些事件与关于殖民主义之后什么样的酷儿政治成为可能的讨论有很大联系。《不合时宜》指出了后殖民时代非洲国家的殖民主义,他们不仅强烈支持将酷儿和跨性别者定为犯罪的法律,而且在某些情况下,就像乌干达的例子一样,用比以前严厉得多的措辞重新制定和改写了这些法律。拉奥认为,在争相说“恐同症是殖民输入”的过程中
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Towards a trans politics of post-coloniality
Rahul Rao’s Out of Time: The Queer Politics of Post-Coloniality was one of my lockdown reads. As such I arrived at its pages in the same way I think many have since the moment of its publication: with a desperate desire for distraction and engagement. And it delivered. As many other readers and respondents have already noted, this book is written with immense care, generous thinking, and intellectual curiosity. It does the incredible theoretical melding and mixing that many scholars who are working from and thinking with projects in the Global South (myself included) prize. That is, centring the Global South while deftly tacking from the local to the global and back again. In doing so, one of the critical offerings Out of Time makes is troubling the narrative that has, seemingly, so easily become the hill on which debates and political organising regarding African sexualities have come to sacrifice themselves. A narrative that hinges on the question: what is unAfrican? Homophobia or homosexuality? Which of these is the culturally inauthentic interloper? Drawing on Uganda to provide a crucial example of the discursive constructions of homophobia and how this debate about so-called ‘unAfricaness’ unfolds in myriad directions, Out of Time not only notes the inconsistencies in this debate, but also does some hefty lifting in linking this debate to a global flow of people, capital, ideas and terms between fonrmer colonies and the colonial metropole. As part of this global flow, I write this response, in South Africa, on a public holiday – Freedom Day. It is a cruel reminder of how far we have yet to go that on the day before Freedom Day, queer and trans South Africans, across the country and despite COVID-19, felt it deeply necessary to march and gather publicly for two reasons. The first, a call to end what is being termed a ‘wave of hate crimes’ targeting queer and trans people after the brutal murders of Bonang Gaelae, Nonhlanhla Kunene, Lonwabo Jack, Lulu Ntuthela, Nathaniel Spokgoane Mbele, Khulekani Gomazi and Sphamandla Khoza. There will be three more names added to this list in the days to come. The second was to show solidarity with queer and trans refugees, predominantly from Uganda, a group who are quite clearly the outcome of some of the developments Out of Time sketches, living in Kakuma refugee camp, Kenya. This is in the wake of an arson attack that left one member of that community dead and several others severely injured. Unfortunately, much like in South Africa, there will be more violence, neglect and abjection in the days to come. Both of these events read to me as indicative of the ways that the underpinnings of the debate regarding ‘unAfricaness’ continue to inform conditions of life and death for those living on the African continent recognised or cast as queer. In this way, these events are very much linked to this discussion about what kinds of queer politics become possible in the aftermath of colonialism. Out of Time points to the coloniality of postcolonial African states in not only vehemently upholding laws that criminalise queer and trans people but in some cases, as with the Ugandan example, reinventing and re-inscribing those laws in terms far harsher than previously. Rao suggests that, in the scramble to say that ‘homophobia is a colonial import’, there has been a
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Chair in Entebbe Things never remain the same Poetics of silence Not just a hashtag Your security, our territories
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1