晚期多发性硬化症非卧床患者阻力性吸气肌训练后积极结果的预测因素

M. Huang, L. Doyle, A. Burnham, D. Fry, K. Shea
{"title":"晚期多发性硬化症非卧床患者阻力性吸气肌训练后积极结果的预测因素","authors":"M. Huang, L. Doyle, A. Burnham, D. Fry, K. Shea","doi":"10.1177/20552173211058862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Inspiratory muscle training (IMT) using a threshold device improves inspiratory muscle strength. What factors influence the IMT outcome has not been examined. Objective To identify predictors of the positive outcome following IMT in persons with advanced multiple sclerosis (PwAMS). Methods Inclusion criteria were non-ambulatory PwAMS, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) ≥6.5, age >18 years, no acute medical conditions, current non-smokers, and ability to consent. Participants (n = 38) performed daily inspiratory exercises using a resistive threshold device for 10 weeks. Baseline measurements included age, sex, body mass index, year post multiple sclerosis diagnosis, comorbidities, EDSS, Modified Fatigue Impact Scale-5, and oral Symbol Digit Modality Test. The percentage of completed prescribed exercise trials (Trials%) during the 10-week intervention was calculated. Age- and sex-adjusted predicted values of maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP%pred) and maximum expiratory pressure (MEP%pred) were obtained before and after the 10-week intervention. Backward multivariable regression analyses for the primary outcome (MIP%pred) were conducted. Results After controlling for the initial MIP%pred, perceived fatigue at the baseline and Trial% were significant and independent predictors of MIP%pred after IMT. Conclusion Less fatigue at the baseline and higher adherence to the prescribed exercise repetitions were positive predictors of the positive outcome following IMT in PwAMS.","PeriodicalId":18961,"journal":{"name":"Multiple Sclerosis Journal - Experimental, Translational and Clinical","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors of positive outcomes following resistive inspiratory muscle training in non-ambulatory persons with advanced multiple sclerosis\",\"authors\":\"M. Huang, L. Doyle, A. Burnham, D. Fry, K. Shea\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20552173211058862\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Inspiratory muscle training (IMT) using a threshold device improves inspiratory muscle strength. What factors influence the IMT outcome has not been examined. Objective To identify predictors of the positive outcome following IMT in persons with advanced multiple sclerosis (PwAMS). Methods Inclusion criteria were non-ambulatory PwAMS, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) ≥6.5, age >18 years, no acute medical conditions, current non-smokers, and ability to consent. Participants (n = 38) performed daily inspiratory exercises using a resistive threshold device for 10 weeks. Baseline measurements included age, sex, body mass index, year post multiple sclerosis diagnosis, comorbidities, EDSS, Modified Fatigue Impact Scale-5, and oral Symbol Digit Modality Test. The percentage of completed prescribed exercise trials (Trials%) during the 10-week intervention was calculated. Age- and sex-adjusted predicted values of maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP%pred) and maximum expiratory pressure (MEP%pred) were obtained before and after the 10-week intervention. Backward multivariable regression analyses for the primary outcome (MIP%pred) were conducted. Results After controlling for the initial MIP%pred, perceived fatigue at the baseline and Trial% were significant and independent predictors of MIP%pred after IMT. Conclusion Less fatigue at the baseline and higher adherence to the prescribed exercise repetitions were positive predictors of the positive outcome following IMT in PwAMS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18961,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Multiple Sclerosis Journal - Experimental, Translational and Clinical\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Multiple Sclerosis Journal - Experimental, Translational and Clinical\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20552173211058862\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multiple Sclerosis Journal - Experimental, Translational and Clinical","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20552173211058862","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景使用阈值装置的吸气肌训练(IMT)可以提高吸气肌的力量。哪些因素影响IMT结果尚未得到研究。目的确定晚期多发性硬化症患者IMT阳性结果的预测因素。方法纳入标准为非门诊PwAMS,扩展残疾状态量表(EDSS)≥6.5,年龄>18岁,无急性疾病,目前为非吸烟者,有同意能力。参与者(n=38)使用阻力阈值装置进行为期10周的每日吸气练习。基线测量包括年龄、性别、体重指数、多发性硬化症诊断后的年份、合并症、EDSS、改良疲劳影响量表-5和口头符号数字模态测试。计算10周干预期间完成规定运动试验的百分比(试验%)。在干预10周前后,获得经年龄和性别调整的最大吸气压(MIP%pred)和最大呼气压(MEP%pred)预测值。对主要结果(MIP%pred)进行了后向多变量回归分析。结果在控制了初始MIP%pred后,基线和试验%的感知疲劳是IMT后MIP%pred的显著和独立预测因素。结论基线时较少的疲劳和对规定运动重复次数的更高依从性是PwAMS IMT后阳性结果的积极预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predictors of positive outcomes following resistive inspiratory muscle training in non-ambulatory persons with advanced multiple sclerosis
Background Inspiratory muscle training (IMT) using a threshold device improves inspiratory muscle strength. What factors influence the IMT outcome has not been examined. Objective To identify predictors of the positive outcome following IMT in persons with advanced multiple sclerosis (PwAMS). Methods Inclusion criteria were non-ambulatory PwAMS, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) ≥6.5, age >18 years, no acute medical conditions, current non-smokers, and ability to consent. Participants (n = 38) performed daily inspiratory exercises using a resistive threshold device for 10 weeks. Baseline measurements included age, sex, body mass index, year post multiple sclerosis diagnosis, comorbidities, EDSS, Modified Fatigue Impact Scale-5, and oral Symbol Digit Modality Test. The percentage of completed prescribed exercise trials (Trials%) during the 10-week intervention was calculated. Age- and sex-adjusted predicted values of maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP%pred) and maximum expiratory pressure (MEP%pred) were obtained before and after the 10-week intervention. Backward multivariable regression analyses for the primary outcome (MIP%pred) were conducted. Results After controlling for the initial MIP%pred, perceived fatigue at the baseline and Trial% were significant and independent predictors of MIP%pred after IMT. Conclusion Less fatigue at the baseline and higher adherence to the prescribed exercise repetitions were positive predictors of the positive outcome following IMT in PwAMS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Cannabinoids for spasticity in patients with multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Treatment effect modifiers of immunotherapies for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis-A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cesarian sections in women with multiple sclerosis: A Canadian prospective pregnancy study. Exploring the relationship between neurologists and older persons with multiple sclerosis through the lens of social support theory. Illness representation in patients with multiple sclerosis: A preliminary narrative medicine study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1