衡量种族/民族退休财富不平等

Q4 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Journal of Retirement Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3520189
Wenliang Hou, Geoffrey T. Sanzenbacher
{"title":"衡量种族/民族退休财富不平等","authors":"Wenliang Hou, Geoffrey T. Sanzenbacher","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3520189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the US population becomes more diverse, it will be increasingly important for policymakers addressing Social Security’s solvency to understand how reliant various racial and ethnic groups will be on the program versus other sources of retirement wealth. Yet, to date, studies on retirement wealth have tended not to focus on race and ethnicity, have largely ignored the role of Social Security, or have excluded the most recent cohort approaching retirement—the Late Boomers. This project uses data from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) to document the retirement resources of White, Black, and Hispanic households at various points in the wealth distribution for five HRS cohorts of 51- to 56-year-olds between 1992 and 2016. TOPICS: Retirement, wealth management, social security Key Findings ▪ In 2016, the typical Black household had 46 percent of the retirement wealth of the typical White household; the typical Hispanic household had 49 percent. This inequality would be much higher but for the presence of Social Security. ▪ The 1992 to 2010 HRS cohorts showed little change in retirement wealth inequality, although a decline in 51- to 56-year-old White households’ retirement wealth between 2010 and 2016 narrowed the racial and ethnic gaps in retirement wealth slightly. ▪ The progressivity of Social Security, combined with lower average incomes for minority households, means that replacement rates are more equal than wealth—in 2016, the replacement rate of Black households was 82 percent of White households and Hispanic households was 95 percent.","PeriodicalId":36429,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Retirement","volume":"8 1","pages":"12 - 28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring Racial/Ethnic Retirement Wealth Inequality\",\"authors\":\"Wenliang Hou, Geoffrey T. Sanzenbacher\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3520189\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As the US population becomes more diverse, it will be increasingly important for policymakers addressing Social Security’s solvency to understand how reliant various racial and ethnic groups will be on the program versus other sources of retirement wealth. Yet, to date, studies on retirement wealth have tended not to focus on race and ethnicity, have largely ignored the role of Social Security, or have excluded the most recent cohort approaching retirement—the Late Boomers. This project uses data from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) to document the retirement resources of White, Black, and Hispanic households at various points in the wealth distribution for five HRS cohorts of 51- to 56-year-olds between 1992 and 2016. TOPICS: Retirement, wealth management, social security Key Findings ▪ In 2016, the typical Black household had 46 percent of the retirement wealth of the typical White household; the typical Hispanic household had 49 percent. This inequality would be much higher but for the presence of Social Security. ▪ The 1992 to 2010 HRS cohorts showed little change in retirement wealth inequality, although a decline in 51- to 56-year-old White households’ retirement wealth between 2010 and 2016 narrowed the racial and ethnic gaps in retirement wealth slightly. ▪ The progressivity of Social Security, combined with lower average incomes for minority households, means that replacement rates are more equal than wealth—in 2016, the replacement rate of Black households was 82 percent of White households and Hispanic households was 95 percent.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36429,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Retirement\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"12 - 28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Retirement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3520189\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Retirement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3520189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

随着美国人口变得越来越多样化,政策制定者在解决社会保障的偿付能力问题时,了解不同种族和民族群体对该计划的依赖程度,以及对其他退休财富来源的依赖程度,将变得越来越重要。然而,到目前为止,关于退休财富的研究往往不关注种族和民族,在很大程度上忽视了社会保障的作用,或者排除了最近即将退休的人群——晚婴儿潮一代。该项目使用健康与退休研究(HRS)的数据,记录1992年至2016年期间51至56岁的五个HRS队列中白人,黑人和西班牙裔家庭在财富分配的不同点上的退休资源。2016年,典型黑人家庭的退休财富是典型白人家庭的46%;而典型的西班牙裔家庭只有49%。如果没有社会保障的存在,这种不平等会高得多。■1992年至2010年的HRS队列显示,退休财富不平等的变化不大,尽管51岁至56岁白人家庭的退休财富在2010年至2016年期间有所下降,但退休财富的种族和民族差距略有缩小。▪社会保障的累进性,加上少数族裔家庭较低的平均收入,意味着替代率比财富更平等——2016年,黑人家庭的替代率是白人家庭的82%,西班牙裔家庭的替代率是95%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Measuring Racial/Ethnic Retirement Wealth Inequality
As the US population becomes more diverse, it will be increasingly important for policymakers addressing Social Security’s solvency to understand how reliant various racial and ethnic groups will be on the program versus other sources of retirement wealth. Yet, to date, studies on retirement wealth have tended not to focus on race and ethnicity, have largely ignored the role of Social Security, or have excluded the most recent cohort approaching retirement—the Late Boomers. This project uses data from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) to document the retirement resources of White, Black, and Hispanic households at various points in the wealth distribution for five HRS cohorts of 51- to 56-year-olds between 1992 and 2016. TOPICS: Retirement, wealth management, social security Key Findings ▪ In 2016, the typical Black household had 46 percent of the retirement wealth of the typical White household; the typical Hispanic household had 49 percent. This inequality would be much higher but for the presence of Social Security. ▪ The 1992 to 2010 HRS cohorts showed little change in retirement wealth inequality, although a decline in 51- to 56-year-old White households’ retirement wealth between 2010 and 2016 narrowed the racial and ethnic gaps in retirement wealth slightly. ▪ The progressivity of Social Security, combined with lower average incomes for minority households, means that replacement rates are more equal than wealth—in 2016, the replacement rate of Black households was 82 percent of White households and Hispanic households was 95 percent.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Retirement
Journal of Retirement Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Finance
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Investment Restrictions on Pension Participants: A Case Study of Nigeria Editor’s Letter The Role of Annuities in Managing Sequence of Returns Risk Approaching and in Retirement guest commentary Valuation of Financial Decision-Making Retirement Planning, Retirement Insecurity, and Financial Satisfaction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1