企业社会责任对供应链碳减排的影响

IF 1.9 4区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT Chinese Management Studies Pub Date : 2023-04-04 DOI:10.1108/cms-04-2022-0151
Weijie Zhou, Jianhua Zhu, Ce Zhang
{"title":"企业社会责任对供应链碳减排的影响","authors":"Weijie Zhou, Jianhua Zhu, Ce Zhang","doi":"10.1108/cms-04-2022-0151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to introduce corporate social responsibility into the green supply chain and analyse the impact of different decision makers’ decision-making schemes on carbon emission reduction in the supply chain.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study uses a two-stage low-carbon supply chain composed of a manufacturer and retailer as the research object. It uses the Stackelberg game model to analyse optimal carbon emission reduction and its influence under different decision-making modes.\n\n\nFindings\nIncreased consumer green preferences and trust can improve the manufacturing enterprises’ carbon emission reduction rate. The carbon emission reduction rate decreases with increased green innovation costs. When green technology innovation costs remain constant, the greater the market capacity, the higher the carbon emission reduction rate. Market capacity has the most significant impact on the optimal carbon emission reduction rate without considering social responsibility decisions and has the least impact on the optimal carbon emission reduction rate while fully considering the social responsibility decision. To achieve decarbonisation production, the market capacity must be small, and when green innovation costs are high, it is the optimal choice without considering social responsibility. To achieve a higher level of carbon emission reduction, when the market capacity is low and the research and development cost is high or when the market capacity is large, it is the optimal choice.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe results provide scientific policy decisions and management significance for governments and enterprises in low-carbon subsidies and supply chain management. The findings also provide a basis for future theoretical research and enterprise practice.\n","PeriodicalId":51675,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Management Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of corporate social responsibility on carbon emission reduction in supply chains\",\"authors\":\"Weijie Zhou, Jianhua Zhu, Ce Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/cms-04-2022-0151\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis paper aims to introduce corporate social responsibility into the green supply chain and analyse the impact of different decision makers’ decision-making schemes on carbon emission reduction in the supply chain.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThis study uses a two-stage low-carbon supply chain composed of a manufacturer and retailer as the research object. It uses the Stackelberg game model to analyse optimal carbon emission reduction and its influence under different decision-making modes.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nIncreased consumer green preferences and trust can improve the manufacturing enterprises’ carbon emission reduction rate. The carbon emission reduction rate decreases with increased green innovation costs. When green technology innovation costs remain constant, the greater the market capacity, the higher the carbon emission reduction rate. Market capacity has the most significant impact on the optimal carbon emission reduction rate without considering social responsibility decisions and has the least impact on the optimal carbon emission reduction rate while fully considering the social responsibility decision. To achieve decarbonisation production, the market capacity must be small, and when green innovation costs are high, it is the optimal choice without considering social responsibility. To achieve a higher level of carbon emission reduction, when the market capacity is low and the research and development cost is high or when the market capacity is large, it is the optimal choice.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThe results provide scientific policy decisions and management significance for governments and enterprises in low-carbon subsidies and supply chain management. The findings also provide a basis for future theoretical research and enterprise practice.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":51675,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Management Studies\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Management Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/cms-04-2022-0151\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Management Studies","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/cms-04-2022-0151","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的将企业社会责任引入绿色供应链,分析不同决策者的决策方案对供应链碳减排的影响。设计/方法论/方法本研究以制造商和零售商组成的两阶段低碳供应链为研究对象。利用Stackelberg博弈模型分析了不同决策模式下的最优碳减排及其影响。发现增加消费者的绿色偏好和信任可以提高制造业企业的碳减排率。碳减排率随着绿色创新成本的增加而降低。当绿色技术创新成本保持不变时,市场容量越大,碳减排率越高。在不考虑社会责任决策的情况下,市场容量对最优碳减排率的影响最显著,在充分考虑社会责任决定的情况下对最优碳排放率的影响最小。要实现脱碳生产,市场容量必须较小,当绿色创新成本较高时,这是不考虑社会责任的最佳选择。要实现更高水平的碳减排,当市场容量较低、研发成本较高时,或者当市场容量较大时,都是最优选择。原创性/价值研究结果为政府和企业在低碳补贴和供应链管理方面提供了科学的政策决策和管理意义。研究结果也为今后的理论研究和企业实践提供了依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of corporate social responsibility on carbon emission reduction in supply chains
Purpose This paper aims to introduce corporate social responsibility into the green supply chain and analyse the impact of different decision makers’ decision-making schemes on carbon emission reduction in the supply chain. Design/methodology/approach This study uses a two-stage low-carbon supply chain composed of a manufacturer and retailer as the research object. It uses the Stackelberg game model to analyse optimal carbon emission reduction and its influence under different decision-making modes. Findings Increased consumer green preferences and trust can improve the manufacturing enterprises’ carbon emission reduction rate. The carbon emission reduction rate decreases with increased green innovation costs. When green technology innovation costs remain constant, the greater the market capacity, the higher the carbon emission reduction rate. Market capacity has the most significant impact on the optimal carbon emission reduction rate without considering social responsibility decisions and has the least impact on the optimal carbon emission reduction rate while fully considering the social responsibility decision. To achieve decarbonisation production, the market capacity must be small, and when green innovation costs are high, it is the optimal choice without considering social responsibility. To achieve a higher level of carbon emission reduction, when the market capacity is low and the research and development cost is high or when the market capacity is large, it is the optimal choice. Originality/value The results provide scientific policy decisions and management significance for governments and enterprises in low-carbon subsidies and supply chain management. The findings also provide a basis for future theoretical research and enterprise practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
13.60%
发文量
63
期刊最新文献
Voluntary overqualification: conceptualization, scale development and validation Friend or foe in the eyes of the beholder? How and when LMX increases and decreases workplace ostracism Cautious or confident? Directors’ and officers’ liability insurance and enterprise strategic change: a model of mediating effect and joint moderating effects Does perceived overqualification lead to cyberloafing? A moderated-mediation model based on social cognitive theory How can firms achieve sustainable high growth? A case study based on the integrating orchestration of digital elements and traditional resources
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1