“我认为这只是帮助我看到:”将依恋融入反思团队

IF 0.4 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL International Journal of Systemic Therapy Pub Date : 2020-09-18 DOI:10.1080/08975353.2020.1818499
M. Edwards, R. Allan
{"title":"“我认为这只是帮助我看到:”将依恋融入反思团队","authors":"M. Edwards, R. Allan","doi":"10.1080/08975353.2020.1818499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Historically, hope has been studied from a cognitive, not experiential, lens and rarely from an attachment perspective. The aims of this research were to explore how couples experience hope when using a reflecting team (RT) as part of their counseling process as well as if their experience of hope differed based depending on their attachment style. To examine these questions, couples (n = 13) completed attachment measures as well as participated in interviews assessing their experience of hope in relation to the reflecting team. The research was methodologically directed by interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA), which draws on the participants’ meaning-making of the reflecting team process. Participants’ attachment strategies impacted which interventions used by the reflecting teams were most relevant and powerful in inducing hope.","PeriodicalId":29822,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Systemic Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08975353.2020.1818499","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“I Think It Just Helped Me See:” Incorporating Attachment into Reflecting Teams\",\"authors\":\"M. Edwards, R. Allan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08975353.2020.1818499\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Historically, hope has been studied from a cognitive, not experiential, lens and rarely from an attachment perspective. The aims of this research were to explore how couples experience hope when using a reflecting team (RT) as part of their counseling process as well as if their experience of hope differed based depending on their attachment style. To examine these questions, couples (n = 13) completed attachment measures as well as participated in interviews assessing their experience of hope in relation to the reflecting team. The research was methodologically directed by interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA), which draws on the participants’ meaning-making of the reflecting team process. Participants’ attachment strategies impacted which interventions used by the reflecting teams were most relevant and powerful in inducing hope.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29822,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Systemic Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08975353.2020.1818499\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Systemic Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08975353.2020.1818499\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Systemic Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08975353.2020.1818499","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要从历史上看,人们一直从认知而非经验的角度研究希望,很少从依恋的角度研究。这项研究的目的是探索夫妻在咨询过程中使用反思团队(RT)时如何体验希望,以及他们的希望体验是否因依恋风格而异。为了研究这些问题,夫妻(n=13)完成了依恋测量,并参加了访谈,评估他们与反思团队的希望体验。本研究以解释性现象学分析(IPA)为方法论指导,该分析借鉴了参与者对反映团队过程的意义形成。参与者的依恋策略影响了反思团队使用的哪些干预措施在引发希望方面最相关、最有力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“I Think It Just Helped Me See:” Incorporating Attachment into Reflecting Teams
ABSTRACT Historically, hope has been studied from a cognitive, not experiential, lens and rarely from an attachment perspective. The aims of this research were to explore how couples experience hope when using a reflecting team (RT) as part of their counseling process as well as if their experience of hope differed based depending on their attachment style. To examine these questions, couples (n = 13) completed attachment measures as well as participated in interviews assessing their experience of hope in relation to the reflecting team. The research was methodologically directed by interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA), which draws on the participants’ meaning-making of the reflecting team process. Participants’ attachment strategies impacted which interventions used by the reflecting teams were most relevant and powerful in inducing hope.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Predicting Psychological Well-Being Based on Five Personality Traits by Mediating Role of Marital Control The Way Home The Way Home [TV series] , Conkie, H, Clarke, A, Szew, F, Pillemer, H, Grimaldi, L, Kevork, A, Zipursky, A, Reed, M, Berger, S. L., MacDowell, A, Leigh, C, (Executive Producers), Neshama Entertainment; MarVista Entertainment, 2023. Does Person-of-the-Therapist Training (POTT) Promote Self-Caring Attitude for Trainees in a Chinese Society? A Directed Content Analysis at a University in Taiwan Adaptation of the Turkish Family of Origin Scale and the Development of Parallel Short Forms Parent Education in Bangladeshi Families with Young Children of Diverse Abilities: Implementation of the Learning Through Play Calendar
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1