个性化医疗和伊卡洛斯计划:将人类送入太空的伦理和道德问题

M. Legato
{"title":"个性化医疗和伊卡洛斯计划:将人类送入太空的伦理和道德问题","authors":"M. Legato","doi":"10.1177/2470289719838401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The irresistible urge of humans to expand their current competence in mastering the environment is nowhere more apparent than the attempt to conquer space and colonize other worlds. The promise of an expanded universe for earth’s life forms is irresistible. It is driven by positive and negative forces: among others, devastating climate change (and irreducible disagreements on the measures needed to reverse it), the threat of nuclear conflicts that will make huge segments of earth uninhabitable, and the possibility of harvesting precious resources on other celestial bodies. The questions that arise involve the selection and preparation of humans for life in other worlds but equally important, a consideration of the practical, moral, and ethical issues that arise in our exploiting novel environments. Our ethical deliberations should not only focus on the consequences of space travel for the astronaut, but just as responsibly on our impact on the geophysical features and life forms we encounter in the new worlds we explore and manipulate. It is worth remarking that the push to explore other worlds (such as the proposal for human colonization of Mars in the next few decades) is regarded by some as yet hopelessly deficient in an adequate understanding of human physiology, and the vulnerability that makes individuals unequal to the harsh challenges of space. Anthropologist Rayna Slobodian mounts a cogent argument for remaining solidly earthbound, at least for the present; she correctly points out that the data on the impact of the unique environments astronauts will encounter although abundant and exponentially expanding, are still inadequate to adequately mitigate the dangers of space travel. She advocates ethical advertising in “selling space” to the public. The way in which the space industry hides (at times without even knowing it) the full extent of the risks for Mars missions with humans involves . . . romanticism, utopian ideals, lack of cognitive awareness, and fear-based selling . . . The rush to settle is dangerous and careless.","PeriodicalId":32801,"journal":{"name":"Gender and the Genome","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2470289719838401","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Personalized Medicine and the Icarus Project: Ethical and Moral Issues in Sending Humans into Space\",\"authors\":\"M. Legato\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/2470289719838401\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The irresistible urge of humans to expand their current competence in mastering the environment is nowhere more apparent than the attempt to conquer space and colonize other worlds. The promise of an expanded universe for earth’s life forms is irresistible. It is driven by positive and negative forces: among others, devastating climate change (and irreducible disagreements on the measures needed to reverse it), the threat of nuclear conflicts that will make huge segments of earth uninhabitable, and the possibility of harvesting precious resources on other celestial bodies. The questions that arise involve the selection and preparation of humans for life in other worlds but equally important, a consideration of the practical, moral, and ethical issues that arise in our exploiting novel environments. Our ethical deliberations should not only focus on the consequences of space travel for the astronaut, but just as responsibly on our impact on the geophysical features and life forms we encounter in the new worlds we explore and manipulate. It is worth remarking that the push to explore other worlds (such as the proposal for human colonization of Mars in the next few decades) is regarded by some as yet hopelessly deficient in an adequate understanding of human physiology, and the vulnerability that makes individuals unequal to the harsh challenges of space. Anthropologist Rayna Slobodian mounts a cogent argument for remaining solidly earthbound, at least for the present; she correctly points out that the data on the impact of the unique environments astronauts will encounter although abundant and exponentially expanding, are still inadequate to adequately mitigate the dangers of space travel. She advocates ethical advertising in “selling space” to the public. The way in which the space industry hides (at times without even knowing it) the full extent of the risks for Mars missions with humans involves . . . romanticism, utopian ideals, lack of cognitive awareness, and fear-based selling . . . The rush to settle is dangerous and careless.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gender and the Genome\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2470289719838401\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gender and the Genome\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/2470289719838401\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender and the Genome","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2470289719838401","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

人类想要扩大目前控制环境的能力的不可抗拒的冲动,在征服太空和殖民其他世界的企图中表现得最为明显。为地球上的生命形式提供一个扩大的宇宙的前景是不可抗拒的。它是由积极和消极的力量驱动的:其中包括毁灭性的气候变化(以及在扭转气候变化所需措施上无法消除的分歧),将使地球大片地区无法居住的核冲突的威胁,以及在其他天体上获取宝贵资源的可能性。由此产生的问题包括选择和准备人类在其他世界的生活,但同样重要的是,考虑到在我们开发新环境中出现的实际、道德和伦理问题。我们的伦理讨论不仅应该关注太空旅行对宇航员的影响,还应该负责任地关注我们对我们在探索和操纵的新世界中遇到的地球物理特征和生命形式的影响。值得注意的是,一些人认为,探索其他世界的努力(比如未来几十年人类殖民火星的提议)仍无可救药地缺乏对人类生理学的充分理解,以及使个人无法应对太空严酷挑战的脆弱性。人类学家蕾娜·斯洛博迪安(Rayna Slobodian)提出了一个令人信服的论点,认为至少在目前,人类应该牢牢地留在地球上;她正确地指出,关于宇航员将遇到的独特环境影响的数据虽然丰富且呈指数级增长,但仍不足以充分减轻太空旅行的危险。她主张在向公众“出售空间”的过程中进行道德广告。航天工业隐藏(有时甚至不知道)载人火星任务的全部风险的方式包括……浪漫主义、乌托邦式理想、缺乏认知意识和基于恐惧的销售……急于安定下来既危险又粗心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Personalized Medicine and the Icarus Project: Ethical and Moral Issues in Sending Humans into Space
The irresistible urge of humans to expand their current competence in mastering the environment is nowhere more apparent than the attempt to conquer space and colonize other worlds. The promise of an expanded universe for earth’s life forms is irresistible. It is driven by positive and negative forces: among others, devastating climate change (and irreducible disagreements on the measures needed to reverse it), the threat of nuclear conflicts that will make huge segments of earth uninhabitable, and the possibility of harvesting precious resources on other celestial bodies. The questions that arise involve the selection and preparation of humans for life in other worlds but equally important, a consideration of the practical, moral, and ethical issues that arise in our exploiting novel environments. Our ethical deliberations should not only focus on the consequences of space travel for the astronaut, but just as responsibly on our impact on the geophysical features and life forms we encounter in the new worlds we explore and manipulate. It is worth remarking that the push to explore other worlds (such as the proposal for human colonization of Mars in the next few decades) is regarded by some as yet hopelessly deficient in an adequate understanding of human physiology, and the vulnerability that makes individuals unequal to the harsh challenges of space. Anthropologist Rayna Slobodian mounts a cogent argument for remaining solidly earthbound, at least for the present; she correctly points out that the data on the impact of the unique environments astronauts will encounter although abundant and exponentially expanding, are still inadequate to adequately mitigate the dangers of space travel. She advocates ethical advertising in “selling space” to the public. The way in which the space industry hides (at times without even knowing it) the full extent of the risks for Mars missions with humans involves . . . romanticism, utopian ideals, lack of cognitive awareness, and fear-based selling . . . The rush to settle is dangerous and careless.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊最新文献
Elucidating the Relationship Between Insomnia, Sex, and Cardiovascular Disease Gender Differences in Endothelial Function and Coronary Vasomotion Abnormalities Contemplating on the Etiology of COVID-19 Severity and Mortality Sex Differences Roundtable Discussion on COVID-19 Through a Sex and Gender Lens Corrigendum to “Differences Between Europe and the United States on AI/Digital Policy: Comment Response to Roundtable Discussion on AI”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1