传统与现代的对抗:葡萄牙共和国的宣告

Q4 Social Sciences Janus.net Pub Date : 2018-10-01 DOI:10.26619/1647-7251.9.2.4
Luís Alves de Fraga
{"title":"传统与现代的对抗:葡萄牙共和国的宣告","authors":"Luís Alves de Fraga","doi":"10.26619/1647-7251.9.2.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We have enjoyed the pleasure of discussing the proclamation of the Republic in Portugal in a variety of ways. The most profound work impressing us through the multiplicity of perspectives was that of the researcher Alice Samara (2010). It raises several explanatory hypotheses for different understandings of the Republic, according to the perspectives and the moments by which the regime and the republican idea are looked at. Also recently, an excellent article by Jorge Pais de Sousa on Afonso Costa has been published, which gives us the possibility of understanding the Republic from a point of view almost unidentified so far (SOUSA, [s.d.]). Our perspective does not seek to make a critical, piecemeal judgment of legislation and political and party behaviour during the sixteen-year regime between 1910 and 1926. It concludes with the victory or defeat of republican thought; we are interested in focusing attention throughout the period perceiving and explaining the Republic before and after the proclamation as a result of the confrontation between the social group's leaps to modernity, to the new, to the different, and to the group that maintains the existing reality of tradition and conservatism.","PeriodicalId":38150,"journal":{"name":"Janus.net","volume":"2 1","pages":"45-59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The confrontation between tradition and modernity: the proclamation of the republic in Portugal\",\"authors\":\"Luís Alves de Fraga\",\"doi\":\"10.26619/1647-7251.9.2.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We have enjoyed the pleasure of discussing the proclamation of the Republic in Portugal in a variety of ways. The most profound work impressing us through the multiplicity of perspectives was that of the researcher Alice Samara (2010). It raises several explanatory hypotheses for different understandings of the Republic, according to the perspectives and the moments by which the regime and the republican idea are looked at. Also recently, an excellent article by Jorge Pais de Sousa on Afonso Costa has been published, which gives us the possibility of understanding the Republic from a point of view almost unidentified so far (SOUSA, [s.d.]). Our perspective does not seek to make a critical, piecemeal judgment of legislation and political and party behaviour during the sixteen-year regime between 1910 and 1926. It concludes with the victory or defeat of republican thought; we are interested in focusing attention throughout the period perceiving and explaining the Republic before and after the proclamation as a result of the confrontation between the social group's leaps to modernity, to the new, to the different, and to the group that maintains the existing reality of tradition and conservatism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Janus.net\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"45-59\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Janus.net\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26619/1647-7251.9.2.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Janus.net","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26619/1647-7251.9.2.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

我们很高兴以各种方式讨论在葡萄牙宣布共和国的问题。通过多种视角给我们留下深刻印象的最深刻的作品是研究人员Alice Samara(2010)的作品。根据政权和共和理念的视角和时刻,它为对共和国的不同理解提出了几个解释性假设。最近,Jorge Pais de Sousa发表了一篇关于阿丰索·科斯塔的优秀文章,这使我们有可能从一个迄今为止几乎不为人知的角度来理解共和国(SOUSA,[s.d])。我们的观点并不寻求对1910年至1926年16年政权期间的立法、政治和政党行为做出批判性的、零碎的判断。它以共和思想的胜利或失败而结束;我们有兴趣在整个时期集中注意力,感知和解释共和国的宣布前后,这是社会群体向现代性、新的、不同的飞跃以及保持传统和保守主义现有现实的群体之间对抗的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The confrontation between tradition and modernity: the proclamation of the republic in Portugal
We have enjoyed the pleasure of discussing the proclamation of the Republic in Portugal in a variety of ways. The most profound work impressing us through the multiplicity of perspectives was that of the researcher Alice Samara (2010). It raises several explanatory hypotheses for different understandings of the Republic, according to the perspectives and the moments by which the regime and the republican idea are looked at. Also recently, an excellent article by Jorge Pais de Sousa on Afonso Costa has been published, which gives us the possibility of understanding the Republic from a point of view almost unidentified so far (SOUSA, [s.d.]). Our perspective does not seek to make a critical, piecemeal judgment of legislation and political and party behaviour during the sixteen-year regime between 1910 and 1926. It concludes with the victory or defeat of republican thought; we are interested in focusing attention throughout the period perceiving and explaining the Republic before and after the proclamation as a result of the confrontation between the social group's leaps to modernity, to the new, to the different, and to the group that maintains the existing reality of tradition and conservatism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Janus.net
Janus.net Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
China and European Union countries: Do Chinese partnerships boost cooperation results? EU-China relations: Exploring the possibility of cognitive dissonance It’s Not Venus, but Minerva: The European Quest for Relevance vis-à-vis the China Challenge Ukraine Geopolitical European Flashpoints vis-à-vis India and China: From Ambivalence to Strategic Engagement. Perspectives on The Suspension of the Eu-China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1