心理治疗师在流行病共同危机中提供治疗的经验

IF 0.5 Q4 PSYCHIATRY British Journal of Psychotherapy Pub Date : 2023-07-23 DOI:10.1111/bjp.12859
Ellen Dunn, Divine Charura, Sarah Niblock, Gabriel Davies
{"title":"心理治疗师在流行病共同危机中提供治疗的经验","authors":"Ellen Dunn,&nbsp;Divine Charura,&nbsp;Sarah Niblock,&nbsp;Gabriel Davies","doi":"10.1111/bjp.12859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The objective of this study was to capture therapists’ experiences of delivering therapy throughout the COVID-19 pandemic and how this experience impacted therapeutic alliance. Quantitative and qualitative analyses were conducted on the responses to three surveys distributed to all UKCP members. The qualitative and quantitative analyses found significant variability in therapists’ feelings regarding the transition to online therapy, with overall perceptions continuing to be divided similarly throughout the nine months surveyed. While qualitative data highlighted positive perceptions of online therapy for some, quantitative results showed that most did not find online therapy to be as effective as face-to-face therapy. The pandemic and subsequent shift to online work had significant implications for therapists, including navigating unfamiliar changes to the therapeutic space resulting from experiencing a shared crisis, and holding the frame in relation to boundaries of safety. In the wake of the pandemic, as things shift increasingly towards a hybrid model of delivering therapy, it is important to reflect on what can be learned from this transition and how this influences future therapeutic practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":54130,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Psychotherapy","volume":"39 4","pages":"682-701"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Experiences of Psychotherapists Delivering Therapy During the Shared Crisis of a Pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Ellen Dunn,&nbsp;Divine Charura,&nbsp;Sarah Niblock,&nbsp;Gabriel Davies\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bjp.12859\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The objective of this study was to capture therapists’ experiences of delivering therapy throughout the COVID-19 pandemic and how this experience impacted therapeutic alliance. Quantitative and qualitative analyses were conducted on the responses to three surveys distributed to all UKCP members. The qualitative and quantitative analyses found significant variability in therapists’ feelings regarding the transition to online therapy, with overall perceptions continuing to be divided similarly throughout the nine months surveyed. While qualitative data highlighted positive perceptions of online therapy for some, quantitative results showed that most did not find online therapy to be as effective as face-to-face therapy. The pandemic and subsequent shift to online work had significant implications for therapists, including navigating unfamiliar changes to the therapeutic space resulting from experiencing a shared crisis, and holding the frame in relation to boundaries of safety. In the wake of the pandemic, as things shift increasingly towards a hybrid model of delivering therapy, it is important to reflect on what can be learned from this transition and how this influences future therapeutic practices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54130,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Psychotherapy\",\"volume\":\"39 4\",\"pages\":\"682-701\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Psychotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjp.12859\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjp.12859","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是捕捉治疗师在COVID-19大流行期间提供治疗的经验,以及这种经验如何影响治疗联盟。定量和定性分析是对分发给所有UKCP成员的三份调查的回应进行的。定性和定量分析发现,治疗师对过渡到在线治疗的感受存在显著差异,在调查的9个月里,总体看法仍然存在类似的分歧。虽然定性数据强调了一些人对在线治疗的积极看法,但定量结果显示,大多数人认为在线治疗不如面对面治疗有效。大流行以及随后转向在线工作对治疗师产生了重大影响,包括应对因经历共同危机而导致的不熟悉的治疗空间变化,以及保持与安全边界有关的框架。在大流行之后,随着情况越来越多地转向提供治疗的混合模式,重要的是要反思可以从这种转变中学到什么,以及这将如何影响未来的治疗实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Experiences of Psychotherapists Delivering Therapy During the Shared Crisis of a Pandemic

The objective of this study was to capture therapists’ experiences of delivering therapy throughout the COVID-19 pandemic and how this experience impacted therapeutic alliance. Quantitative and qualitative analyses were conducted on the responses to three surveys distributed to all UKCP members. The qualitative and quantitative analyses found significant variability in therapists’ feelings regarding the transition to online therapy, with overall perceptions continuing to be divided similarly throughout the nine months surveyed. While qualitative data highlighted positive perceptions of online therapy for some, quantitative results showed that most did not find online therapy to be as effective as face-to-face therapy. The pandemic and subsequent shift to online work had significant implications for therapists, including navigating unfamiliar changes to the therapeutic space resulting from experiencing a shared crisis, and holding the frame in relation to boundaries of safety. In the wake of the pandemic, as things shift increasingly towards a hybrid model of delivering therapy, it is important to reflect on what can be learned from this transition and how this influences future therapeutic practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
50.00%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Psychotherapy is a journal for psychoanalytic and Jungian-analytic thinkers, with a focus on both innovatory and everyday work on the unconscious in individual, group and institutional practice. As an analytic journal, it has long occupied a unique place in the field of psychotherapy journals with an Editorial Board drawn from a wide range of psychoanalytic, psychoanalytic psychotherapy, psychodynamic, and analytical psychology training organizations. As such, its psychoanalytic frame of reference is wide-ranging and includes all schools of analytic practice. Conscious that many clinicians do not work only in the consulting room, the Journal encourages dialogue between private practice and institutionally based practice. Recognizing that structures and dynamics in each environment differ, the Journal provides a forum for an exploration of their differing potentials and constraints. Mindful of significant change in the wider contemporary context for psychotherapy, and within a changing regulatory framework, the Journal seeks to represent current debate about this context.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information - Cover and Editorial Board Editorial November 2024 Primitive Bodily Communications in Psychotherapy: Embodied Expressions of a Disembodied Psyche. Raffaella Hilty (ed.). Published by Karnac, London, 2022; 224 pp, £26.99 (paperback), £24.00 (eBook), £31.99 (paperback and eBook). Clinical Commentary 49 Poetry and Psychoanalysis: The Opening of the Field, by David Shaddock. Published by Routledge, London and New York, 2020; 194 pp, £130.00 (hardback), £32.99 (paperback), £29.69 (eBook). Part of the Routledge Art, Creativity, and Psychoanalysis Book Series.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1