探索个性化反馈模型、学习设计和评估结果之间的关系

IF 4.1 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education Pub Date : 2022-10-27 DOI:10.1080/02602938.2022.2139351
Fatemeh Salehian Kia, Abelardo Pardo, S. Dawson, Heather O’Brien
{"title":"探索个性化反馈模型、学习设计和评估结果之间的关系","authors":"Fatemeh Salehian Kia, Abelardo Pardo, S. Dawson, Heather O’Brien","doi":"10.1080/02602938.2022.2139351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The increasing use of technology in education has brought new opportunities for the systematic collection of student data. Analyzing technology-mediated trace data, for example, has enabled researchers to bring new insights into student learning processes and the factors involved to support learning and teaching. However, many of these learning analytic studies have drawn conclusions from limited data sets that are derived from a single course or program of study. This impacts the generalizability of noted outcomes and calls for research on larger institutional data sets. The institutional adoption and analysis of learning technology can provide deeper insights into a wide range of learning contexts in practice. This study focused on examining how instructors used the learning tool, OnTask, to provide personalized feedback for students in large classes. We collected usage data from 99 courses and 19,385 students to examine how the instructors customized feedback to different groups of students. The findings reveal that there is a significant association between the topics of feedback and students with different performance. The results also demonstrated that instructors most frequently provided feedback related to student assessment. The study emphasizes the importance of teacher and student feedback literacy for creating effective feedback loops.","PeriodicalId":48267,"journal":{"name":"Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education","volume":"48 1","pages":"860 - 873"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the relationship between personalized feedback models, learning design and assessment outcomes\",\"authors\":\"Fatemeh Salehian Kia, Abelardo Pardo, S. Dawson, Heather O’Brien\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02602938.2022.2139351\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The increasing use of technology in education has brought new opportunities for the systematic collection of student data. Analyzing technology-mediated trace data, for example, has enabled researchers to bring new insights into student learning processes and the factors involved to support learning and teaching. However, many of these learning analytic studies have drawn conclusions from limited data sets that are derived from a single course or program of study. This impacts the generalizability of noted outcomes and calls for research on larger institutional data sets. The institutional adoption and analysis of learning technology can provide deeper insights into a wide range of learning contexts in practice. This study focused on examining how instructors used the learning tool, OnTask, to provide personalized feedback for students in large classes. We collected usage data from 99 courses and 19,385 students to examine how the instructors customized feedback to different groups of students. The findings reveal that there is a significant association between the topics of feedback and students with different performance. The results also demonstrated that instructors most frequently provided feedback related to student assessment. The study emphasizes the importance of teacher and student feedback literacy for creating effective feedback loops.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"860 - 873\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2022.2139351\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2022.2139351","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要技术在教育中的日益使用为系统收集学生数据带来了新的机会。例如,分析技术中介的追踪数据使研究人员能够对学生的学习过程以及支持学习和教学的因素有新的见解。然而,这些学习分析研究中的许多都是从有限的数据集中得出结论的,这些数据集是从单一的课程或课程中得出的。这影响了所注意到的结果的可推广性,并要求对更大的机构数据集进行研究。机构对学习技术的采用和分析可以在实践中对广泛的学习环境提供更深入的见解。这项研究的重点是考察教师如何使用学习工具OnTask为大班学生提供个性化反馈。我们收集了99门课程和19385名学生的使用数据,以研究讲师如何为不同的学生群体定制反馈。研究结果表明,反馈主题与不同表现的学生之间存在显著关联。研究结果还表明,教师最常提供与学生评估相关的反馈。该研究强调了教师和学生的反馈素养对于创建有效的反馈回路的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring the relationship between personalized feedback models, learning design and assessment outcomes
Abstract The increasing use of technology in education has brought new opportunities for the systematic collection of student data. Analyzing technology-mediated trace data, for example, has enabled researchers to bring new insights into student learning processes and the factors involved to support learning and teaching. However, many of these learning analytic studies have drawn conclusions from limited data sets that are derived from a single course or program of study. This impacts the generalizability of noted outcomes and calls for research on larger institutional data sets. The institutional adoption and analysis of learning technology can provide deeper insights into a wide range of learning contexts in practice. This study focused on examining how instructors used the learning tool, OnTask, to provide personalized feedback for students in large classes. We collected usage data from 99 courses and 19,385 students to examine how the instructors customized feedback to different groups of students. The findings reveal that there is a significant association between the topics of feedback and students with different performance. The results also demonstrated that instructors most frequently provided feedback related to student assessment. The study emphasizes the importance of teacher and student feedback literacy for creating effective feedback loops.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
15.90%
发文量
70
期刊最新文献
‘There was very little room for me to be me’: the lived tensions between assessment standardisation and student diversity Perceptions of feedback and engagement with feedback among undergraduates: an educational identities approach Feedback engagement as a multidimensional construct: a validation study Interacting with ChatGPT for internal feedback and factors affecting feedback quality Diversity of pedagogical feedback designs: results from a scoping review of feedback research in higher education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1