阴茎癌患者的社会支持:一项混合方法研究

Eeva Harju RN, PhD, Minna Törnävä PT, PhD, Hanna Vasarainen MD, PhD, Tomi Pakarainen MD, PhD, Mika Helminen MSc, Ilkka Perttilä MD, Antti Kaipia MD, PhD
{"title":"阴茎癌患者的社会支持:一项混合方法研究","authors":"Eeva Harju RN, PhD,&nbsp;Minna Törnävä PT, PhD,&nbsp;Hanna Vasarainen MD, PhD,&nbsp;Tomi Pakarainen MD, PhD,&nbsp;Mika Helminen MSc,&nbsp;Ilkka Perttilä MD,&nbsp;Antti Kaipia MD, PhD","doi":"10.1111/ijun.12354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The research questions were as follows: How much social support do patients with penile cancer (PC) receive after surgical treatment for the condition; which factors are associated with the social support received; and how do patients with PC describe the social support they receive in terms of emotional support, affirmation and concrete aid? The purpose of this study is to describe the amount and type of social support (that is, emotional support, affirmation or concrete aid) received by patients with PC. In addition, it describes the associations between patients' background variables and their perceived social support. Men affected by PC experience a range of unmet support care needs, of which social support has not previously been thoroughly studied. Emotional support consists of caring for another person, respecting and creating a safe atmosphere for them and providing spiritual support. Affirmation is the reinforcement of knowledge and is especially evident in decision-making processes through advising or counselling. Concrete aid means the provision of assistance in the form of an activity or service that causes the donor to use time or money for the benefit of another person. A partially mixed concurrent dominant status design was used and included semi-structured interviews with, or letter responses from, 15 patients and a self-reported social support score survey of 42 patients with PC. The data were analysed using descriptive statistics, a non-parametric test and a deductive content analysis. Regarding the self-reported social support score survey, 42 patients reported the social support as good (mean [SD]; range 4.34 [1.06]; 1–6). The most frequent form of social support was affirmation (mean [SD] 4.65 [1.07]), and the least frequent was emotional support (mean [SD] 4.14 [1.16]). Employment status and primary operation were significantly associated with the social support received. Qualitative data imply that family members are the most important emotional supporters. Emotional support from healthcare professionals was felt to be insufficient. Despite their affirmation, patients felt they received incomplete information about the disease. Patients received concrete aid from family members but felt there was a lack of professional help. Although patients deemed the overall social support received to be good, they received insufficient support from healthcare professionals (emotional support) and had unmet informational needs (affirmation) as well as uncertainties regarding income support (concrete aid). Our results can help nurses provide more holistic care to patients with PC. This information can be utilized in the development of nursing interventions for such patients and their family members. In the future, nurses' and other healthcare professionals' counselling skills should be taken into account in their training. They also need to be supported through consultation and referral resources when they reach the limits of their expertise.</p>","PeriodicalId":50281,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Urological Nursing","volume":"17 2","pages":"129-138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social support for patients with penile cancer: A mixed-method study\",\"authors\":\"Eeva Harju RN, PhD,&nbsp;Minna Törnävä PT, PhD,&nbsp;Hanna Vasarainen MD, PhD,&nbsp;Tomi Pakarainen MD, PhD,&nbsp;Mika Helminen MSc,&nbsp;Ilkka Perttilä MD,&nbsp;Antti Kaipia MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ijun.12354\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The research questions were as follows: How much social support do patients with penile cancer (PC) receive after surgical treatment for the condition; which factors are associated with the social support received; and how do patients with PC describe the social support they receive in terms of emotional support, affirmation and concrete aid? The purpose of this study is to describe the amount and type of social support (that is, emotional support, affirmation or concrete aid) received by patients with PC. In addition, it describes the associations between patients' background variables and their perceived social support. Men affected by PC experience a range of unmet support care needs, of which social support has not previously been thoroughly studied. Emotional support consists of caring for another person, respecting and creating a safe atmosphere for them and providing spiritual support. Affirmation is the reinforcement of knowledge and is especially evident in decision-making processes through advising or counselling. Concrete aid means the provision of assistance in the form of an activity or service that causes the donor to use time or money for the benefit of another person. A partially mixed concurrent dominant status design was used and included semi-structured interviews with, or letter responses from, 15 patients and a self-reported social support score survey of 42 patients with PC. The data were analysed using descriptive statistics, a non-parametric test and a deductive content analysis. Regarding the self-reported social support score survey, 42 patients reported the social support as good (mean [SD]; range 4.34 [1.06]; 1–6). The most frequent form of social support was affirmation (mean [SD] 4.65 [1.07]), and the least frequent was emotional support (mean [SD] 4.14 [1.16]). Employment status and primary operation were significantly associated with the social support received. Qualitative data imply that family members are the most important emotional supporters. Emotional support from healthcare professionals was felt to be insufficient. Despite their affirmation, patients felt they received incomplete information about the disease. Patients received concrete aid from family members but felt there was a lack of professional help. Although patients deemed the overall social support received to be good, they received insufficient support from healthcare professionals (emotional support) and had unmet informational needs (affirmation) as well as uncertainties regarding income support (concrete aid). Our results can help nurses provide more holistic care to patients with PC. This information can be utilized in the development of nursing interventions for such patients and their family members. In the future, nurses' and other healthcare professionals' counselling skills should be taken into account in their training. They also need to be supported through consultation and referral resources when they reach the limits of their expertise.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Urological Nursing\",\"volume\":\"17 2\",\"pages\":\"129-138\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Urological Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijun.12354\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Urological Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijun.12354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究问题如下:阴茎癌(PC)患者在手术治疗后获得了多少社会支持;哪些因素与所获得的社会支持有关?PC患者如何描述他们在情感支持、肯定和具体帮助方面获得的社会支持?本研究的目的是描述PC患者所获得的社会支持(即情感支持、肯定或具体援助)的数量和类型。此外,它描述了患者的背景变量和他们的感知社会支持之间的关联。受PC影响的男性经历了一系列未满足的支持护理需求,其中社会支持以前没有被彻底研究过。情感支持包括关心另一个人,尊重并为他们创造一个安全的氛围,以及提供精神支持。肯定是对知识的强化,在决策过程中通过建议或咨询尤其明显。具体援助是指以活动或服务的形式提供援助,使捐助者为另一个人的利益使用时间或金钱。采用部分混合并发支配地位设计,包括对15名PC患者的半结构化访谈或信件回复,以及对42名PC患者的自我报告社会支持评分调查。使用描述性统计、非参数检验和演绎内容分析对数据进行分析。在自我报告的社会支持评分调查中,42例患者认为社会支持良好(mean [SD];范围4.34 [1.06];1 - 6)。最常见的社会支持形式是肯定(mean [SD] 4.65[1.07]),最不常见的是情感支持(mean [SD] 4.14[1.16])。就业状况和初级业务与所获得的社会支持显著相关。定性数据表明,家庭成员是最重要的情感支持者。来自医疗保健专业人员的情感支持被认为是不够的。尽管得到了肯定,但患者还是觉得他们得到了关于这种疾病的不完整信息。患者从家人那里得到了具体的帮助,但他们觉得缺乏专业的帮助。虽然患者认为获得的整体社会支持是好的,但他们从医疗保健专业人员那里获得的支持不足(情感支持),信息需求未得到满足(肯定),收入支持不确定(具体援助)。我们的研究结果可以帮助护士为PC患者提供更全面的护理。这些信息可用于为此类患者及其家庭成员制定护理干预措施。今后,在培训护士和其他保健专业人员时,应考虑到他们的咨询技能。当他们的专业知识达到极限时,还需要通过咨询和转诊资源对他们提供支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Social support for patients with penile cancer: A mixed-method study

The research questions were as follows: How much social support do patients with penile cancer (PC) receive after surgical treatment for the condition; which factors are associated with the social support received; and how do patients with PC describe the social support they receive in terms of emotional support, affirmation and concrete aid? The purpose of this study is to describe the amount and type of social support (that is, emotional support, affirmation or concrete aid) received by patients with PC. In addition, it describes the associations between patients' background variables and their perceived social support. Men affected by PC experience a range of unmet support care needs, of which social support has not previously been thoroughly studied. Emotional support consists of caring for another person, respecting and creating a safe atmosphere for them and providing spiritual support. Affirmation is the reinforcement of knowledge and is especially evident in decision-making processes through advising or counselling. Concrete aid means the provision of assistance in the form of an activity or service that causes the donor to use time or money for the benefit of another person. A partially mixed concurrent dominant status design was used and included semi-structured interviews with, or letter responses from, 15 patients and a self-reported social support score survey of 42 patients with PC. The data were analysed using descriptive statistics, a non-parametric test and a deductive content analysis. Regarding the self-reported social support score survey, 42 patients reported the social support as good (mean [SD]; range 4.34 [1.06]; 1–6). The most frequent form of social support was affirmation (mean [SD] 4.65 [1.07]), and the least frequent was emotional support (mean [SD] 4.14 [1.16]). Employment status and primary operation were significantly associated with the social support received. Qualitative data imply that family members are the most important emotional supporters. Emotional support from healthcare professionals was felt to be insufficient. Despite their affirmation, patients felt they received incomplete information about the disease. Patients received concrete aid from family members but felt there was a lack of professional help. Although patients deemed the overall social support received to be good, they received insufficient support from healthcare professionals (emotional support) and had unmet informational needs (affirmation) as well as uncertainties regarding income support (concrete aid). Our results can help nurses provide more holistic care to patients with PC. This information can be utilized in the development of nursing interventions for such patients and their family members. In the future, nurses' and other healthcare professionals' counselling skills should be taken into account in their training. They also need to be supported through consultation and referral resources when they reach the limits of their expertise.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Urological Nursing is an international peer-reviewed Journal for all nurses, non-specialist and specialist, who care for individuals with urological disorders. It is relevant for nurses working in a variety of settings: inpatient care, outpatient care, ambulatory care, community care, operating departments and specialist clinics. The Journal covers the whole spectrum of urological nursing skills and knowledge. It supports the publication of local issues of relevance to a wider international community to disseminate good practice. The International Journal of Urological Nursing is clinically focused, evidence-based and welcomes contributions in the following clinical and non-clinical areas: -General Urology- Continence care- Oncology- Andrology- Stoma care- Paediatric urology- Men’s health- Uro-gynaecology- Reconstructive surgery- Clinical audit- Clinical governance- Nurse-led services- Reflective analysis- Education- Management- Research- Leadership The Journal welcomes original research papers, practice development papers and literature reviews. It also invites shorter papers such as case reports, critical commentary, reflective analysis and reports of audit, as well as contributions to regular sections such as the media reviews section. The International Journal of Urological Nursing supports the development of academic writing within the specialty and particularly welcomes papers from young researchers or practitioners who are seeking to build a publication profile.
期刊最新文献
The effects of continuous care utilizing rational emotive therapy on prostate cancer patients Knowledge and practices of nurses working in urology clinics on fluid–electrolyte monitoring and management Postoperative nursing in robot-assisted urologic surgery: Are there any platform-based differences? Adherence and uncertainty during rehabilitation for urinary incontinence: Validation of a scale Assessing the reliability and usefulness of ChatGPT responses on intermittent catheterization queries: A critical analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1