评估在线图书馆指南使用和开放教育资源(OER)潜力:基于证据的决策方法

IF 0.9 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Journal of Web Librarianship Pub Date : 2021-06-14 DOI:10.1080/19322909.2021.1935396
Deborah L. Lauseng, C. Howard, J. Scoulas, A. Berry
{"title":"评估在线图书馆指南使用和开放教育资源(OER)潜力:基于证据的决策方法","authors":"Deborah L. Lauseng, C. Howard, J. Scoulas, A. Berry","doi":"10.1080/19322909.2021.1935396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This research aims to measure the impact of an online guide on user learning experience and to gather evidence for staffing allocations and for conversion of the guide to an open educational resource (OER). It utilizes quantitative and qualitative methods by combining usage data (Google Analytics) with a web-based user survey that incorporates the Project Outcome Model. Google Analytics data for the guide from July through December 2019 indicates 45,324 Users for 67,405 Pageviews. For the same timeframe, survey data (N = 119) shows that the participants were primarily students (64%) and practicing health professionals (23%). The mean scores of confidence between first-time and repeat users have a statistically significant difference on three guide pages. Combining data sources provides a more robust assessment and a clearer understanding of who users are, their behavior, and guide impact on user learning and outcomes. The high number of nonaffiliated users and the self-reported success in achieving learning outcomes reinforce the value of converting the guide to an OER. This research benefits those working in the library and educational fields by providing insights into the use of online guides as OER, the need for library-based OER, and the use of evidence to support staffing allocations.","PeriodicalId":54091,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Web Librarianship","volume":"15 1","pages":"128 - 153"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19322909.2021.1935396","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing Online Library Guide Use and Open Educational Resource (OER) Potential: An Evidence-Based Decision-Making Approach\",\"authors\":\"Deborah L. Lauseng, C. Howard, J. Scoulas, A. Berry\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19322909.2021.1935396\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This research aims to measure the impact of an online guide on user learning experience and to gather evidence for staffing allocations and for conversion of the guide to an open educational resource (OER). It utilizes quantitative and qualitative methods by combining usage data (Google Analytics) with a web-based user survey that incorporates the Project Outcome Model. Google Analytics data for the guide from July through December 2019 indicates 45,324 Users for 67,405 Pageviews. For the same timeframe, survey data (N = 119) shows that the participants were primarily students (64%) and practicing health professionals (23%). The mean scores of confidence between first-time and repeat users have a statistically significant difference on three guide pages. Combining data sources provides a more robust assessment and a clearer understanding of who users are, their behavior, and guide impact on user learning and outcomes. The high number of nonaffiliated users and the self-reported success in achieving learning outcomes reinforce the value of converting the guide to an OER. This research benefits those working in the library and educational fields by providing insights into the use of online guides as OER, the need for library-based OER, and the use of evidence to support staffing allocations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54091,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Web Librarianship\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"128 - 153\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19322909.2021.1935396\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Web Librarianship\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2021.1935396\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Web Librarianship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2021.1935396","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在衡量在线指南对用户学习体验的影响,并为人员配置和指南向开放教育资源(OER)的转换收集证据。它利用定量和定性的方法,将使用数据(b谷歌Analytics)与基于网络的用户调查相结合,并结合项目结果模型。谷歌2019年7月至12月该指南的分析数据显示,45,324名用户拥有67,405页浏览量。在同一时间段内,调查数据(N = 119)显示,参与者主要是学生(64%)和执业卫生专业人员(23%)。在三个指南页面上,初次用户和重复用户的平均信心得分有统计学上的显著差异。结合数据源可以提供更可靠的评估,并更清楚地了解用户是谁、他们的行为以及对用户学习和结果的指导影响。大量的非附属用户和在实现学习成果方面的自我报告成功强化了将指南转换为OER的价值。这项研究为图书馆和教育领域的工作人员提供了关于在线指南作为OER的使用、基于图书馆的OER的需求以及使用证据来支持人员分配的见解,从而使他们受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing Online Library Guide Use and Open Educational Resource (OER) Potential: An Evidence-Based Decision-Making Approach
Abstract This research aims to measure the impact of an online guide on user learning experience and to gather evidence for staffing allocations and for conversion of the guide to an open educational resource (OER). It utilizes quantitative and qualitative methods by combining usage data (Google Analytics) with a web-based user survey that incorporates the Project Outcome Model. Google Analytics data for the guide from July through December 2019 indicates 45,324 Users for 67,405 Pageviews. For the same timeframe, survey data (N = 119) shows that the participants were primarily students (64%) and practicing health professionals (23%). The mean scores of confidence between first-time and repeat users have a statistically significant difference on three guide pages. Combining data sources provides a more robust assessment and a clearer understanding of who users are, their behavior, and guide impact on user learning and outcomes. The high number of nonaffiliated users and the self-reported success in achieving learning outcomes reinforce the value of converting the guide to an OER. This research benefits those working in the library and educational fields by providing insights into the use of online guides as OER, the need for library-based OER, and the use of evidence to support staffing allocations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Web Librarianship
Journal of Web Librarianship INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
13.30%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Academic Libraries and Collaborative Research Services AI and the Future of Library and Information Science Introduction to the Special Issue Change What You Can, Teach What You Can’t: A Usability Study of Primo VE at an Academic Library The Impact of ChatGPT for Enhancing Knowledge Management in University Libraries Exploring the Prospects and Perils of Integrating Artificial Intelligence and ChatGPT in Academic and Research Libraries (ARL): Challenges and Opportunity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1