二尖瓣分离指数评价风湿性二尖瓣狭窄严重程度

IF 0.1 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Nepalese Heart Journal Pub Date : 2019-11-14 DOI:10.3126/njh.v16i2.26316
R. Paudel, R. Sah, M. Kc, D. Sharma, A. Maskey, R. Malla, S. Rajbhandari, P. Kc, R. Tamrakar, B. Gautam, K. Sherpa
{"title":"二尖瓣分离指数评价风湿性二尖瓣狭窄严重程度","authors":"R. Paudel, R. Sah, M. Kc, D. Sharma, A. Maskey, R. Malla, S. Rajbhandari, P. Kc, R. Tamrakar, B. Gautam, K. Sherpa","doi":"10.3126/njh.v16i2.26316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aims: Determining the severity of mitral stenosis (MS) is important for both prognostic and therapeutic reasons. Measurement of Mitral valve area (MVA) by planimetry is gold standard and accurate but is highly operator dependent. Pressure Half Time (PHT) is affected by hemodynamic significance. In this Study we evaluated severity of mitral stenosis by mitral leaflet separation index (MLS index, MLSI). This new index could be useful surrogate measure of the MVA. \nMethods: This is a hospital based, cross-sectional observational study carried out in Shahid Gangalal National Heart Centre (SGNHC), Kathmandu, Nepal. Study included 82 patients with Rheumatic MS who had undergone echocardiographic examination from July 2018 to December 2018. The maximal separation of the mitral valve leaflet tips was measured from inner edge to inner edge in end diastole in the parasternal long axis and apical 4-chamber views. These two parameters were averaged to yield the MLSI. The index was compared with mitral valve area determined by planimetry method and PHT. \nResults: Of the 82 study subjects, majority were females 72 (85.4%). The mean age of study patients was 37.33±11.56 years. 30.5% had mild MS by planimetry, 31.7% had moderate MS and 37.8% had severe MS. There was a very strong correlation between MLS index and MVA by planimetry ( r = 0.89, p<0.001) and MVA by PHT (r=0.95, p<0.001). MLS index less than 0.73 cm can predict severe MS with 93.2% sensitivity and 89.3% specificity. On the other hand MLS index more than 1.035cm can predict mild MS with 70% sensitivity and 89.3% specificity. Strong correlation exists between MLS index and MV severity in presence atrial fibrillation (AF) (r=0.879) for planimetry and (r=0.835) for PHT and in presence of coexisting mitral regurgitation (MR) (r=0.89) for planimetry and (r=0.86) for PHT. \nConclusion: MLSI has a strong correlation with MVA by planimetry and PHT. So, it can be used as a reliable method to assess severity of mitral stenosis and is a simple and easily obtainable. It has good correlation even in presence of AF and MR.","PeriodicalId":52010,"journal":{"name":"Nepalese Heart Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3126/njh.v16i2.26316","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Rheumatic Mitral Stenosis severity by Mitral Leaflet Separation Index\",\"authors\":\"R. Paudel, R. Sah, M. Kc, D. Sharma, A. Maskey, R. Malla, S. Rajbhandari, P. Kc, R. Tamrakar, B. Gautam, K. Sherpa\",\"doi\":\"10.3126/njh.v16i2.26316\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and Aims: Determining the severity of mitral stenosis (MS) is important for both prognostic and therapeutic reasons. Measurement of Mitral valve area (MVA) by planimetry is gold standard and accurate but is highly operator dependent. Pressure Half Time (PHT) is affected by hemodynamic significance. In this Study we evaluated severity of mitral stenosis by mitral leaflet separation index (MLS index, MLSI). This new index could be useful surrogate measure of the MVA. \\nMethods: This is a hospital based, cross-sectional observational study carried out in Shahid Gangalal National Heart Centre (SGNHC), Kathmandu, Nepal. Study included 82 patients with Rheumatic MS who had undergone echocardiographic examination from July 2018 to December 2018. The maximal separation of the mitral valve leaflet tips was measured from inner edge to inner edge in end diastole in the parasternal long axis and apical 4-chamber views. These two parameters were averaged to yield the MLSI. The index was compared with mitral valve area determined by planimetry method and PHT. \\nResults: Of the 82 study subjects, majority were females 72 (85.4%). The mean age of study patients was 37.33±11.56 years. 30.5% had mild MS by planimetry, 31.7% had moderate MS and 37.8% had severe MS. There was a very strong correlation between MLS index and MVA by planimetry ( r = 0.89, p<0.001) and MVA by PHT (r=0.95, p<0.001). MLS index less than 0.73 cm can predict severe MS with 93.2% sensitivity and 89.3% specificity. On the other hand MLS index more than 1.035cm can predict mild MS with 70% sensitivity and 89.3% specificity. Strong correlation exists between MLS index and MV severity in presence atrial fibrillation (AF) (r=0.879) for planimetry and (r=0.835) for PHT and in presence of coexisting mitral regurgitation (MR) (r=0.89) for planimetry and (r=0.86) for PHT. \\nConclusion: MLSI has a strong correlation with MVA by planimetry and PHT. So, it can be used as a reliable method to assess severity of mitral stenosis and is a simple and easily obtainable. It has good correlation even in presence of AF and MR.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52010,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nepalese Heart Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3126/njh.v16i2.26316\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nepalese Heart Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3126/njh.v16i2.26316\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nepalese Heart Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/njh.v16i2.26316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景和目的:确定二尖瓣狭窄(MS)的严重程度对预后和治疗都很重要。通过平面测量法测量二尖瓣面积(MVA)是金标准和准确的,但高度依赖于操作者。压力半衰期(PHT)受血液动力学意义的影响。在这项研究中,我们通过二尖瓣分离指数(MLS指数,MLSI)来评估二尖瓣狭窄的严重程度。这一新指数可能是MVA的有用替代指标。方法:这是一项基于医院的横断面观察性研究,在尼泊尔加德满都Shahid Gangalal国家心脏中心(SGNHC)进行。研究纳入了82名在2018年7月至2018年12月期间接受超声心动图检查的类风湿性多发性硬化症患者。在胸骨旁长轴和心尖4腔视图中,测量舒张末期二尖瓣瓣叶尖端从内边缘到内边缘的最大间距。对这两个参数进行平均以得到MLSI。将该指标与平面测量法和PHT法测定的二尖瓣面积进行比较。结果:82名受试者中,大多数为女性72人(85.4%)。研究患者的平均年龄为37.33±11.56岁。30.5%的受试者患有轻度多发性硬化症,31.7%患有中度多发性痴呆症,37.8%患有重度多发性炎。MLS指数与面积测量法测得的MVA(r=0.89,p<0.001)和PHT测得的MVA(r=0.95,p<001)有很强的相关性。MLS指数小于0.73cm可预测严重MS,敏感性为93.2%,特异性为89.3%。MLS指数大于1.035cm可预测轻度MS,敏感性为70%,特异性为89.3%。在存在心房颤动(AF)的情况下,MLS指数与MV严重程度之间存在很强的相关性(面积测定法为r=0.879),在PHT的情况下(r=0.835),在同时存在二尖瓣反流(MR)的情况中,面积测定法和PHT的MLS指数(r=0.89)和MV严重程度(r=0.86)。结论:通过平面测量和PHT,MLSI与MVA有很强的相关性。因此,它可以作为评估二尖瓣狭窄严重程度的可靠方法,并且是一种简单易行的方法。即使在AF和MR存在的情况下也具有良好的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of Rheumatic Mitral Stenosis severity by Mitral Leaflet Separation Index
Background and Aims: Determining the severity of mitral stenosis (MS) is important for both prognostic and therapeutic reasons. Measurement of Mitral valve area (MVA) by planimetry is gold standard and accurate but is highly operator dependent. Pressure Half Time (PHT) is affected by hemodynamic significance. In this Study we evaluated severity of mitral stenosis by mitral leaflet separation index (MLS index, MLSI). This new index could be useful surrogate measure of the MVA. Methods: This is a hospital based, cross-sectional observational study carried out in Shahid Gangalal National Heart Centre (SGNHC), Kathmandu, Nepal. Study included 82 patients with Rheumatic MS who had undergone echocardiographic examination from July 2018 to December 2018. The maximal separation of the mitral valve leaflet tips was measured from inner edge to inner edge in end diastole in the parasternal long axis and apical 4-chamber views. These two parameters were averaged to yield the MLSI. The index was compared with mitral valve area determined by planimetry method and PHT. Results: Of the 82 study subjects, majority were females 72 (85.4%). The mean age of study patients was 37.33±11.56 years. 30.5% had mild MS by planimetry, 31.7% had moderate MS and 37.8% had severe MS. There was a very strong correlation between MLS index and MVA by planimetry ( r = 0.89, p<0.001) and MVA by PHT (r=0.95, p<0.001). MLS index less than 0.73 cm can predict severe MS with 93.2% sensitivity and 89.3% specificity. On the other hand MLS index more than 1.035cm can predict mild MS with 70% sensitivity and 89.3% specificity. Strong correlation exists between MLS index and MV severity in presence atrial fibrillation (AF) (r=0.879) for planimetry and (r=0.835) for PHT and in presence of coexisting mitral regurgitation (MR) (r=0.89) for planimetry and (r=0.86) for PHT. Conclusion: MLSI has a strong correlation with MVA by planimetry and PHT. So, it can be used as a reliable method to assess severity of mitral stenosis and is a simple and easily obtainable. It has good correlation even in presence of AF and MR.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nepalese Heart Journal
Nepalese Heart Journal CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
自引率
50.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Patient blood management for cardiovascular surgery: Clinical practice consensus statement Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy in the setting of Urosepsis A Randomized Comparison of Two Doses of Tranexamic Acid in High-Risk Open-Heart Surgery Cardiovascular Disease Risk Profiling among First-Degree Relatives of Premature Coronary Artery Disease Patients Effect of an Educational Intervention for Nursing Personnel on Emergency Inventory and Drugs Checklist of Resuscitation Trolley in a Tertiary Cardiac Center, Kathmandu.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1