畜牧业生产发展的“普遍”政策模式、地方实践和变化动态之间的十字路口的社会技术对象

IF 1.1 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY Nomadic Peoples Pub Date : 2020-10-01 DOI:10.3197/np.2020.240208
S. Magnani
{"title":"畜牧业生产发展的“普遍”政策模式、地方实践和变化动态之间的十字路口的社会技术对象","authors":"S. Magnani","doi":"10.3197/np.2020.240208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Relationships between public policy, resource management and the larger economic contexts remain poorly understood in the African drylands. A better understanding of changes in pastoral systems requires shifting the focus from a static and linear analysis to a dynamic one encompassing\n processes, relationships and contexts. A three-year fieldwork research experience on three different case studies in Senegal has led to the identification of three material objects at the interface between pastoral systems and development interventions: cattle breeds, feeding and\n milk. Such objects are at the heart of pastoral systems, and are typically crucial to policymakers' attempts to intensify pastoral production. By raising the example of cattle feeding in Northern Senegal, I suggest that a methodological and analytical framework focusing on the socio-political\n dimensions of technical objects can be useful to analyse the encounter between the linear and universal input/output rationality of livestock development models and those of pastoralists, based on the embeddedness of socio-political, economic and environmental variability. Such\n an approach, I thus argue, can be used to deconstruct production models, highlighting the context of production and the modes of operation of the social actors. This could open up a space to describe social and technical change beyond abstract and 'universal' development models, and to promote\n more inclusive and empirically based policy-making.","PeriodicalId":19318,"journal":{"name":"Nomadic Peoples","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Socio-Technical Objects at the Crossroads Between 'Universal' Policy Models for Livestock Production Development, Local Practices and Dynamics of Change\",\"authors\":\"S. Magnani\",\"doi\":\"10.3197/np.2020.240208\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Relationships between public policy, resource management and the larger economic contexts remain poorly understood in the African drylands. A better understanding of changes in pastoral systems requires shifting the focus from a static and linear analysis to a dynamic one encompassing\\n processes, relationships and contexts. A three-year fieldwork research experience on three different case studies in Senegal has led to the identification of three material objects at the interface between pastoral systems and development interventions: cattle breeds, feeding and\\n milk. Such objects are at the heart of pastoral systems, and are typically crucial to policymakers' attempts to intensify pastoral production. By raising the example of cattle feeding in Northern Senegal, I suggest that a methodological and analytical framework focusing on the socio-political\\n dimensions of technical objects can be useful to analyse the encounter between the linear and universal input/output rationality of livestock development models and those of pastoralists, based on the embeddedness of socio-political, economic and environmental variability. Such\\n an approach, I thus argue, can be used to deconstruct production models, highlighting the context of production and the modes of operation of the social actors. This could open up a space to describe social and technical change beyond abstract and 'universal' development models, and to promote\\n more inclusive and empirically based policy-making.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nomadic Peoples\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nomadic Peoples\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3197/np.2020.240208\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nomadic Peoples","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3197/np.2020.240208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在非洲旱地,人们对公共政策、资源管理和更大的经济背景之间的关系仍然知之甚少。要更好地理解牧区系统的变化,就需要将重点从静态和线性分析转向包括过程、关系和背景的动态分析。在塞内加尔对三个不同的案例研究进行了为期三年的实地调查,结果确定了牧区系统与发展干预措施之间的三个物质对象:牛的品种、饲养和牛奶。这些物品是牧区系统的核心,通常对政策制定者加强牧区生产的尝试至关重要。通过提出塞内加尔北部养牛的例子,我建议,基于社会政治、经济和环境可变性的嵌入性,一个侧重于技术对象的社会政治层面的方法和分析框架,可以有助于分析牲畜发展模式的线性和普遍投入/产出合理性与牧民的投入/产出合理性之间的相遇。因此,我认为,这种方法可以用来解构生产模式,突出生产的背景和社会行动者的运作模式。这可以开辟一个空间,超越抽象和“普遍”的发展模式来描述社会和技术变革,并促进更具包容性和基于经验的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Socio-Technical Objects at the Crossroads Between 'Universal' Policy Models for Livestock Production Development, Local Practices and Dynamics of Change
Relationships between public policy, resource management and the larger economic contexts remain poorly understood in the African drylands. A better understanding of changes in pastoral systems requires shifting the focus from a static and linear analysis to a dynamic one encompassing processes, relationships and contexts. A three-year fieldwork research experience on three different case studies in Senegal has led to the identification of three material objects at the interface between pastoral systems and development interventions: cattle breeds, feeding and milk. Such objects are at the heart of pastoral systems, and are typically crucial to policymakers' attempts to intensify pastoral production. By raising the example of cattle feeding in Northern Senegal, I suggest that a methodological and analytical framework focusing on the socio-political dimensions of technical objects can be useful to analyse the encounter between the linear and universal input/output rationality of livestock development models and those of pastoralists, based on the embeddedness of socio-political, economic and environmental variability. Such an approach, I thus argue, can be used to deconstruct production models, highlighting the context of production and the modes of operation of the social actors. This could open up a space to describe social and technical change beyond abstract and 'universal' development models, and to promote more inclusive and empirically based policy-making.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nomadic Peoples
Nomadic Peoples ANTHROPOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Nomadic Peoples is an international journal published for the Commission on Nomadic Peoples, International Union of Anthropological and Ethnological Sciences. Its primary concerns are the current circumstances of all nomadic peoples around the world and their prospects. Its readership includes all those interested in nomadic peoples—scholars, researchers, planners and project administrators.
期刊最新文献
Echi Christina Gabbert, Fana Gebresenbet, John G. Galaty and Günther Schlee, Lands of the Future: Anthropological Perspectives on Pastoralism, Land Deals and Tropes of Modernity in Eastern Africa PASTORALIST MOBILITY ALONG THE SUDANESE ETHIOPIAN BORDERLAND: TOWARDS COOPERATIVE LAND MANAGEMENT GENDER-DIFFERENTIATED ROLES AND PERCEPTIONS ON CLIMATE VARIABILITY AMONG PASTORALIST AND AGRO-PASTORALIST COMMUNITIES IN MARSABIT, KENYA PASTORALISTS, CAMELS AND STATE-MAKING: THE BANU SAKHR AND GLUBB PASHA IN EARLY TWENTIETH-CENTURY JORDAN CAROLYN KORNFELD LESOROGOL (1965–2023) – IN MEMORIAM
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1