从不结盟到多结盟:评估印度外交政策的转变

Q3 Social Sciences Round Table Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/00358533.2023.2165367
Rahul Mishra
{"title":"从不结盟到多结盟:评估印度外交政策的转变","authors":"Rahul Mishra","doi":"10.1080/00358533.2023.2165367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Establishing a non-aligned bloc at the height of the power politics-ridden Cold War era was one of the most profound normative contributions India made to the modern international order. This article argues that NAM was a pragmatic yet principled approach to dealing with a world dominated by divisive power politics. For India, non-alignment still lives on to a certain extent in the form of its spirited defence of strategic autonomy and the recent iteration of ‘multi-alignment’ in Indian foreign policy to deal with an uncertain world.","PeriodicalId":35685,"journal":{"name":"Round Table","volume":"112 1","pages":"43 - 56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From non-alignment to multi-alignment: assessing India’s foreign policy shift\",\"authors\":\"Rahul Mishra\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00358533.2023.2165367\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Establishing a non-aligned bloc at the height of the power politics-ridden Cold War era was one of the most profound normative contributions India made to the modern international order. This article argues that NAM was a pragmatic yet principled approach to dealing with a world dominated by divisive power politics. For India, non-alignment still lives on to a certain extent in the form of its spirited defence of strategic autonomy and the recent iteration of ‘multi-alignment’ in Indian foreign policy to deal with an uncertain world.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35685,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Round Table\",\"volume\":\"112 1\",\"pages\":\"43 - 56\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Round Table\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00358533.2023.2165367\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Round Table","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00358533.2023.2165367","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在强权政治充斥的冷战时期,建立一个不结盟集团是印度对现代国际秩序做出的最深刻的规范贡献之一。本文认为,不结盟运动是一种务实而又有原则的方法,以应对由分裂的大国政治主导的世界。对印度来说,不结盟在一定程度上仍然存在,其形式是积极捍卫战略自治,以及印度外交政策中最近反复出现的“多结盟”,以应对一个不确定的世界。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
From non-alignment to multi-alignment: assessing India’s foreign policy shift
ABSTRACT Establishing a non-aligned bloc at the height of the power politics-ridden Cold War era was one of the most profound normative contributions India made to the modern international order. This article argues that NAM was a pragmatic yet principled approach to dealing with a world dominated by divisive power politics. For India, non-alignment still lives on to a certain extent in the form of its spirited defence of strategic autonomy and the recent iteration of ‘multi-alignment’ in Indian foreign policy to deal with an uncertain world.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Round Table
Round Table Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: Founded in 1910, The Round Table, Britain"s oldest international affairs journal, provides analysis and commentary on all aspects of international affairs. The journal is the major source for coverage of policy issues concerning the contemporary Commonwealth and its role in international affairs, with occasional articles on themes of historical interest. The Round Table has for many years been a repository of informed scholarship, opinion, and judgement regarding both international relations in general, and the Commonwealth in particular, with authorship and readership drawn from the worlds of government, business, finance and academe.
期刊最新文献
What is behind the mobs in Pakistan? Sri Lanka: recent crises in a multi-religious society Hugh Segal (1950-2023): departure of a Commonwealth champion The role of religion in conflict and peace-making Introduction: religion and Commonwealth values
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1