对农村支持废除ACA的理解

Ph.D Don E. Albrecht, Western Rural
{"title":"对农村支持废除ACA的理解","authors":"Ph.D Don E. Albrecht, Western Rural","doi":"10.38207/jcmphr/2023/aug04050590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the Affordable Care Act (ACA) was passed in 2010, millions of Americans without health insurance have declined. More rural Americans than urban Americans have obtained health insurance from the ACA. Despite the program's success, Republicans have made numerous attempts to have the ACA repealed, and Republican voters dominate rural America. This manuscript seeks to understand pastoral support for the ACA repeal. Methods: Data for the study were obtained from the 2020 Cooperative Election Study (CES), and responses from 49,740 individuals were utilized. Logit analysis was used to explore the extent to which people supported or opposed the repeal of ACA along the Rural/Urban Continuum. Other variables were statistically controlled in the analysis. Findings: Data analyzed in this manuscript found that persons with characteristics most similar to those who would benefit most from the ACA are most likely to support complete ACA repeal. Significantly, rural residents were more likely to support ACA repeal than urban residents. Most Republicans supported repeal, while nearly all Democrats were opposed. Conclusions: Individuals tend to support their party platform even if it harms them, their community, or persons like them.","PeriodicalId":73683,"journal":{"name":"Journal of community medicine and public health reports","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toward An Understanding of Rural Support For ACA Repeal\",\"authors\":\"Ph.D Don E. Albrecht, Western Rural\",\"doi\":\"10.38207/jcmphr/2023/aug04050590\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since the Affordable Care Act (ACA) was passed in 2010, millions of Americans without health insurance have declined. More rural Americans than urban Americans have obtained health insurance from the ACA. Despite the program's success, Republicans have made numerous attempts to have the ACA repealed, and Republican voters dominate rural America. This manuscript seeks to understand pastoral support for the ACA repeal. Methods: Data for the study were obtained from the 2020 Cooperative Election Study (CES), and responses from 49,740 individuals were utilized. Logit analysis was used to explore the extent to which people supported or opposed the repeal of ACA along the Rural/Urban Continuum. Other variables were statistically controlled in the analysis. Findings: Data analyzed in this manuscript found that persons with characteristics most similar to those who would benefit most from the ACA are most likely to support complete ACA repeal. Significantly, rural residents were more likely to support ACA repeal than urban residents. Most Republicans supported repeal, while nearly all Democrats were opposed. Conclusions: Individuals tend to support their party platform even if it harms them, their community, or persons like them.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73683,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of community medicine and public health reports\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of community medicine and public health reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.38207/jcmphr/2023/aug04050590\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of community medicine and public health reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38207/jcmphr/2023/aug04050590","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自2010年《平价医疗法案》(ACA)通过以来,数百万没有医疗保险的美国人减少了。从《平价医疗法案》获得医疗保险的农村美国人比城市美国人多。尽管该计划取得了成功,但共和党人已经多次试图废除ACA,共和党选民在美国农村占主导地位。这份手稿试图理解牧师对ACA废除的支持。方法:本研究的数据来自2020年合作选举研究(CES),并利用了49,740个人的回复。使用Logit分析来探索农村/城市连续体中人们支持或反对废除ACA的程度。其他变量在分析中得到统计控制。研究结果:本文分析的数据发现,与那些从ACA中获益最多的人特征最相似的人最有可能支持完全废除ACA。值得注意的是,农村居民比城市居民更有可能支持废除ACA。大多数共和党人支持废除该法案,而几乎所有民主党人都反对。结论:个人倾向于支持他们的政党纲领,即使这会伤害到他们、他们的社区或像他们一样的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Toward An Understanding of Rural Support For ACA Repeal
Since the Affordable Care Act (ACA) was passed in 2010, millions of Americans without health insurance have declined. More rural Americans than urban Americans have obtained health insurance from the ACA. Despite the program's success, Republicans have made numerous attempts to have the ACA repealed, and Republican voters dominate rural America. This manuscript seeks to understand pastoral support for the ACA repeal. Methods: Data for the study were obtained from the 2020 Cooperative Election Study (CES), and responses from 49,740 individuals were utilized. Logit analysis was used to explore the extent to which people supported or opposed the repeal of ACA along the Rural/Urban Continuum. Other variables were statistically controlled in the analysis. Findings: Data analyzed in this manuscript found that persons with characteristics most similar to those who would benefit most from the ACA are most likely to support complete ACA repeal. Significantly, rural residents were more likely to support ACA repeal than urban residents. Most Republicans supported repeal, while nearly all Democrats were opposed. Conclusions: Individuals tend to support their party platform even if it harms them, their community, or persons like them.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact Of COVID-19 Distancing Measures On Radiation Oncology Treatments Stress, Anxiety and Depression and Associated Risk Factors Among Postgraduate Medical Students In Tertiary Hospital In Kathmandu Suture Tape Augmentation Repair For Partial ACL Tears: A Prospective Case Series And Surgical Technique Latin Lips - A Novel Approach For Redefinition and Volumization Of Lips With PEGDE Crosslinked Hyaluronic Acid Filler Mortality After PICU Care: Place Of Death And Impact Of Limitation Of Medical Treatment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1