关于社会研究中普通语言和社会学概念化交集的简要说明

Quaderni di Sociologia Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI:10.4000/qds.2199

M. Pitrone

{"title":"关于社会研究中普通语言和社会学概念化交集的简要说明","authors":"M. Pitrone","doi":"10.4000/qds.2199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A brief reflection on the porous boundaries between ordinary language, common knowledge and scientific knowledge is presented, emphasizing the methodological impact of the process of concepts formation and the relevance of tacit knowledge both in everyday life and in scientific activity. By emphasizing the fluidity of concepts, its implications on the debate about indicators choice, question wording and the claim to standardize meanings in surveys are discussed.","PeriodicalId":55721,"journal":{"name":"Quaderni di Sociologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brevi note sull’intersezione tra linguaggio ordinario e concettualizzazione sociologica nella ricerca sociale\",\"authors\":\"M. Pitrone\",\"doi\":\"10.4000/qds.2199\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A brief reflection on the porous boundaries between ordinary language, common knowledge and scientific knowledge is presented, emphasizing the methodological impact of the process of concepts formation and the relevance of tacit knowledge both in everyday life and in scientific activity. By emphasizing the fluidity of concepts, its implications on the debate about indicators choice, question wording and the claim to standardize meanings in surveys are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55721,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quaderni di Sociologia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quaderni di Sociologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4000/qds.2199\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quaderni di Sociologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4000/qds.2199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

简要反思了普通语言、常识和科学知识之间的多孔边界，强调了概念形成过程的方法论影响以及隐性知识在日常生活和科学活动中的相关性。通过强调概念的流动性，讨论了其对指标选择、问题措辞和调查中意义标准化主张的辩论的影响。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Brevi note sull’intersezione tra linguaggio ordinario e concettualizzazione sociologica nella ricerca sociale

A brief reflection on the porous boundaries between ordinary language, common knowledge and scientific knowledge is presented, emphasizing the methodological impact of the process of concepts formation and the relevance of tacit knowledge both in everyday life and in scientific activity. By emphasizing the fluidity of concepts, its implications on the debate about indicators choice, question wording and the claim to standardize meanings in surveys are discussed.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊