探索全球在线课程参与者的互动:高层次参与的价值

IF 4.6 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Recall Pub Date : 2022-02-14 DOI:10.1017/S0958344021000331
H. Jin, Yasin Karatay, Fatemeh Bordbarjavidi, Junghun Yang, Timothy Kochem, A. A. Muhammad, V. Hegelheimer
{"title":"探索全球在线课程参与者的互动:高层次参与的价值","authors":"H. Jin, Yasin Karatay, Fatemeh Bordbarjavidi, Junghun Yang, Timothy Kochem, A. A. Muhammad, V. Hegelheimer","doi":"10.1017/S0958344021000331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Participation in online courses has become essential for training language professionals in under-resourced contexts with skills in computer-assisted language learning (CALL) (Godwin-Jones, 2014). Most online CALL courses use asynchronous computer-mediated communication (ACMC) to facilitate meaningful learning for participants. Although participants’ sustained engagement with ACMC is the target, global realities of participants interfere with their participation levels. This article investigates participants’ engagement profiles in asynchronous online discussions in an 8-week CALL-based global online course developed and implemented by a team at Iowa State University. Using a case study approach, nine focal participants’ engagement profiles have been analyzed in terms of identifying patterns of engagement in the discussion posts and their relation to the types of discussion prompts. Then, social network analysis (SNA) and thematic analysis were employed to investigate patterns of interaction among the participants in the replies. The results indicated that engagement patterns observed in discussion posts overall aligned with the primary goals of prompt types. SNA further identified two participants as social mediators to connect participants with each other. These findings are significant in that they suggest the effectiveness of using ACMC to promote co-construction of knowledge for a global audience. This article also provides implications regarding the design of discussion prompts to help maximize participant engagement with course content.","PeriodicalId":47046,"journal":{"name":"Recall","volume":"34 1","pages":"291 - 308"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring global online course participants’ interactions: Value of high-level engagement\",\"authors\":\"H. Jin, Yasin Karatay, Fatemeh Bordbarjavidi, Junghun Yang, Timothy Kochem, A. A. Muhammad, V. Hegelheimer\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0958344021000331\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Participation in online courses has become essential for training language professionals in under-resourced contexts with skills in computer-assisted language learning (CALL) (Godwin-Jones, 2014). Most online CALL courses use asynchronous computer-mediated communication (ACMC) to facilitate meaningful learning for participants. Although participants’ sustained engagement with ACMC is the target, global realities of participants interfere with their participation levels. This article investigates participants’ engagement profiles in asynchronous online discussions in an 8-week CALL-based global online course developed and implemented by a team at Iowa State University. Using a case study approach, nine focal participants’ engagement profiles have been analyzed in terms of identifying patterns of engagement in the discussion posts and their relation to the types of discussion prompts. Then, social network analysis (SNA) and thematic analysis were employed to investigate patterns of interaction among the participants in the replies. The results indicated that engagement patterns observed in discussion posts overall aligned with the primary goals of prompt types. SNA further identified two participants as social mediators to connect participants with each other. These findings are significant in that they suggest the effectiveness of using ACMC to promote co-construction of knowledge for a global audience. This article also provides implications regarding the design of discussion prompts to help maximize participant engagement with course content.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Recall\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"291 - 308\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Recall\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344021000331\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recall","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344021000331","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要参与在线课程对于在资源不足的情况下培训语言专业人员掌握计算机辅助语言学习(CALL)技能至关重要(Godwin-Jones,2014)。大多数在线CALL课程使用异步计算机中介通信(ACMC)来促进参与者有意义的学习。尽管参与者持续参与ACMC是目标,但参与者的全球现实干扰了他们的参与水平。本文调查了爱荷华州立大学一个团队开发和实施的为期8周的基于CALL的全球在线课程中参与者在异步在线讨论中的参与情况。采用案例研究方法,从确定讨论帖子中的参与模式及其与讨论提示类型的关系的角度,分析了九名重点参与者的参与情况。然后,采用社会网络分析(SNA)和主题分析来调查回复参与者之间的互动模式。结果表明,在讨论帖子中观察到的参与模式总体上与提示类型的主要目标一致。国民账户体系进一步确定了两名参与者作为社会中介,将参与者彼此联系起来。这些发现意义重大,因为它们表明了使用ACMC为全球受众促进知识共建的有效性。本文还提供了有关讨论提示设计的启示,以帮助最大限度地提高参与者对课程内容的参与度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring global online course participants’ interactions: Value of high-level engagement
Abstract Participation in online courses has become essential for training language professionals in under-resourced contexts with skills in computer-assisted language learning (CALL) (Godwin-Jones, 2014). Most online CALL courses use asynchronous computer-mediated communication (ACMC) to facilitate meaningful learning for participants. Although participants’ sustained engagement with ACMC is the target, global realities of participants interfere with their participation levels. This article investigates participants’ engagement profiles in asynchronous online discussions in an 8-week CALL-based global online course developed and implemented by a team at Iowa State University. Using a case study approach, nine focal participants’ engagement profiles have been analyzed in terms of identifying patterns of engagement in the discussion posts and their relation to the types of discussion prompts. Then, social network analysis (SNA) and thematic analysis were employed to investigate patterns of interaction among the participants in the replies. The results indicated that engagement patterns observed in discussion posts overall aligned with the primary goals of prompt types. SNA further identified two participants as social mediators to connect participants with each other. These findings are significant in that they suggest the effectiveness of using ACMC to promote co-construction of knowledge for a global audience. This article also provides implications regarding the design of discussion prompts to help maximize participant engagement with course content.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Recall
Recall Multiple-
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.40%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Forty-two years of computer-assisted language learning research: A scientometric study of hotspot research and trending issues Different interlocutors, different EFL interactional strategies: A case study of intercultural telecollaborative projects in secondary classrooms Examining the relationships among motivation, informal digital learning of English, and foreign language enjoyment: An explanatory mixed-method study ReCALL editorial September 2023 issue Sampling and randomisation in experimental and quasi-experimental CALL studies: Issues and recommendations for design, reporting, review, and interpretation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1