膝神经消融治疗慢性骨关节炎膝关节疼痛的长期疗效:一项前瞻性观察性纵向研究

Q3 Medicine Siriraj Medical Journal Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.33192/smj.v75i6.261692
Thanawut Jitsinthunun, P. Euasobhon, Amornrat Suttijanuwat, Suratsawadee Wangnamthip, P. Rushatamukayanunt, Sukunya Jirachaipitak, N. Zinboonyahgoon, Mohd Suhaimi Tajudin, Rapeepat Narkbunnum, W. Sutipornpalangkul
{"title":"膝神经消融治疗慢性骨关节炎膝关节疼痛的长期疗效:一项前瞻性观察性纵向研究","authors":"Thanawut Jitsinthunun, P. Euasobhon, Amornrat Suttijanuwat, Suratsawadee Wangnamthip, P. Rushatamukayanunt, Sukunya Jirachaipitak, N. Zinboonyahgoon, Mohd Suhaimi Tajudin, Rapeepat Narkbunnum, W. Sutipornpalangkul","doi":"10.33192/smj.v75i6.261692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: When patients with chronic osteoarthritis (OA) knee pain do not respond to conservative treatment and are not suitable for knee arthroplasty, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the genicular nerve is probably an alternative treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of genicular nerve ablation in severe osteoarthritic knee pain patients.\nMaterials and Methods: Patients with severe chronic OA knee pain were recruited and performed a genicular nerve block (GNB). The patients’ demographic data, numerical rating scale (NRS) at rest and on movement, Thai Oxford knee score (Thai OKS), Thai knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score physical function short form (Thai KOOS-PS), timed up and go test, brief pain inventory, fall evaluation, and EuroQol 5D-5L were recorded. For the positive block patients (≥50% pain relief for 24 hours), genicular nerve RFA was performed under fluoroscopic or ultrasound guidance. All patients were followed up at the 1st, 3rd, 6th, 9th and 12th months.\nResults: 21 patients were included in the study, but only 17 were completely followed up for 12 months. At the 12th month, genicular nerve RFA reduced the mean NRS on movement from 7.9±1.6 to 4.0±2.6 (p=0.005), improved knee function (Thai OKS from 18.8±5.3 to 28.5±10.1; p=0.006), but did not significantly improve quality of life (EuroQol-5D-5L from 0.43±0.20 to 0.69±0.33; p=0.130). No adverse events were observed.\nConclusion: Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation in severe chronic OA knee patients demonstrated significant pain relief and functional improvement for up to 12 months without serious adverse events.","PeriodicalId":37270,"journal":{"name":"Siriraj Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term Efficacy of Genicular Nerve Ablation for Chronic Osteoarthritic Knee Pain: A Prospective Observational Longitudinal Study\",\"authors\":\"Thanawut Jitsinthunun, P. Euasobhon, Amornrat Suttijanuwat, Suratsawadee Wangnamthip, P. Rushatamukayanunt, Sukunya Jirachaipitak, N. Zinboonyahgoon, Mohd Suhaimi Tajudin, Rapeepat Narkbunnum, W. Sutipornpalangkul\",\"doi\":\"10.33192/smj.v75i6.261692\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: When patients with chronic osteoarthritis (OA) knee pain do not respond to conservative treatment and are not suitable for knee arthroplasty, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the genicular nerve is probably an alternative treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of genicular nerve ablation in severe osteoarthritic knee pain patients.\\nMaterials and Methods: Patients with severe chronic OA knee pain were recruited and performed a genicular nerve block (GNB). The patients’ demographic data, numerical rating scale (NRS) at rest and on movement, Thai Oxford knee score (Thai OKS), Thai knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score physical function short form (Thai KOOS-PS), timed up and go test, brief pain inventory, fall evaluation, and EuroQol 5D-5L were recorded. For the positive block patients (≥50% pain relief for 24 hours), genicular nerve RFA was performed under fluoroscopic or ultrasound guidance. All patients were followed up at the 1st, 3rd, 6th, 9th and 12th months.\\nResults: 21 patients were included in the study, but only 17 were completely followed up for 12 months. At the 12th month, genicular nerve RFA reduced the mean NRS on movement from 7.9±1.6 to 4.0±2.6 (p=0.005), improved knee function (Thai OKS from 18.8±5.3 to 28.5±10.1; p=0.006), but did not significantly improve quality of life (EuroQol-5D-5L from 0.43±0.20 to 0.69±0.33; p=0.130). No adverse events were observed.\\nConclusion: Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation in severe chronic OA knee patients demonstrated significant pain relief and functional improvement for up to 12 months without serious adverse events.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37270,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Siriraj Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Siriraj Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33192/smj.v75i6.261692\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Siriraj Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33192/smj.v75i6.261692","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:当慢性骨关节炎(OA)膝关节疼痛患者对保守治疗无效且不适合进行膝关节置换术时,膝神经射频消融(RFA)可能是一种替代治疗方法。本研究旨在评估膝神经消融治疗严重骨关节炎性膝关节疼痛患者的疗效和安全性。材料和方法:招募患有严重慢性OA膝关节疼痛的患者,并进行膝神经阻滞(GNB)。记录患者的人口统计学数据、休息和运动时的数字评定量表(NRS)、泰式Oxford膝关节评分(泰式OKS)、泰式膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分——身体功能简表(泰式KOOS-PS)、定时测试、简表疼痛量表、跌倒评估和EuroQol 5D-5L。对于阳性阻滞患者(疼痛缓解≥50%,持续24小时),在荧光镜或超声引导下进行膝神经RFA。所有患者均在第1、3、6、9和12个月进行了随访。结果:21名患者被纳入研究,但只有17名患者得到了12个月的完全随访。在第12个月,膝神经RFA将运动时的平均NRS从7.9±1.6降低到4.0±2.6(p=0.005),改善了膝关节功能(泰国OKS从18.8±5.3提高到28.5±10.1;p=0.006),但没有显著改善生活质量(EuroQol-5D-5L从0.43±0.20提高到0.69±0.33;p=0.0130)。没有观察到不良事件。结论:生殖器神经射频消融术治疗严重慢性OA膝关节患者,在长达12个月的时间里,疼痛明显减轻,功能改善,没有出现严重的不良事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Long-term Efficacy of Genicular Nerve Ablation for Chronic Osteoarthritic Knee Pain: A Prospective Observational Longitudinal Study
Objective: When patients with chronic osteoarthritis (OA) knee pain do not respond to conservative treatment and are not suitable for knee arthroplasty, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the genicular nerve is probably an alternative treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of genicular nerve ablation in severe osteoarthritic knee pain patients. Materials and Methods: Patients with severe chronic OA knee pain were recruited and performed a genicular nerve block (GNB). The patients’ demographic data, numerical rating scale (NRS) at rest and on movement, Thai Oxford knee score (Thai OKS), Thai knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score physical function short form (Thai KOOS-PS), timed up and go test, brief pain inventory, fall evaluation, and EuroQol 5D-5L were recorded. For the positive block patients (≥50% pain relief for 24 hours), genicular nerve RFA was performed under fluoroscopic or ultrasound guidance. All patients were followed up at the 1st, 3rd, 6th, 9th and 12th months. Results: 21 patients were included in the study, but only 17 were completely followed up for 12 months. At the 12th month, genicular nerve RFA reduced the mean NRS on movement from 7.9±1.6 to 4.0±2.6 (p=0.005), improved knee function (Thai OKS from 18.8±5.3 to 28.5±10.1; p=0.006), but did not significantly improve quality of life (EuroQol-5D-5L from 0.43±0.20 to 0.69±0.33; p=0.130). No adverse events were observed. Conclusion: Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation in severe chronic OA knee patients demonstrated significant pain relief and functional improvement for up to 12 months without serious adverse events.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Siriraj Medical Journal
Siriraj Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Incidences, Characteristics, Management and Outcomes of Different Subtypes of Postoperative Delirium in Elderly Patients Admitted to the Surgical Intensive Care Unit: A Secondary Analysis of a Prospective Cohort Study Optimizing Perioperative Care for Elderly Surgical Patients: A Review of Strategies and Evidence-Based Practices Comparison between the Standard Teaching and the Thai Version of Blended Teaching on Basic Airway Management in Siriraj Medical Students Analgesic Efficacy of Ultrasound-guided Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block (FICB) and Outcomes in Preoperative Fast-track Geriatric Patients with Hip Fracture: A Single-center Retrospective Study Effectiveness of Smartphone Applications vs Conventional Care in Warfarin Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial on the Time in the Therapeutic Range
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1