我们感觉如何,非洲鸟类学?情感分析搜索生态焦虑的症状

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2022-08-19 DOI:10.2989/00306525.2022.2114640
Alan T. K. Lee
{"title":"我们感觉如何,非洲鸟类学?情感分析搜索生态焦虑的症状","authors":"Alan T. K. Lee","doi":"10.2989/00306525.2022.2114640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ostrich is co-published by NISC (Pty) Ltd and Informa UK Limited (trading as Taylor & Francis Group) This year the Cape Gannet Morus capensis has been chosen as South Africa’s Bird of the Year. A beautiful coastal bird, I have seen these foraging in large flocks which give the impression they are common and doing well, and so it has been concerning to learn that the species is Endangered, with ongoing population declines on its island colonies. The population is under pressure for food resources, as well as from natural predators, as we learn in Strydom et al. (2022). Koopman (2022) quotes this text as a description from over 100 years ago: ‘The Malagash, as it is called by the Colonists, or Common Gannet of South Africa, frequents, in countless thousands, the whole of our coastline....’. It is certainly countable in 2022 and becoming more so with passing time with fewer and fewer to count. This is a depressing situation, and yet another unfolding ecological tragedy. Learning about Cape Gannet made me sad, but it is not the only thing. Unfortunately, it appears we live in ‘interesting times’ as per the alleged Chinese curse. The past two years have been torrid, and I suspect few have not been affected by inconvenience at least, or the loss of loved ones at worst, due to the global COVID-19 pandemic and associated lockdowns. As I write, the situation in Europe is very unsettled with the invasion of Ukraine by Russia. All this is set against the backdrop of climate change, with a mounting portfolio of associated disasters. Over the last decade we’ve also seen political polarisation, and a backlash against everything deemed to be too ‘left’, into which conservation initiatives are frequently lumped (Scholes 2013). In Africa, we are seeing the loss of natural environments to a combination of urban and agricultural expansion, ‘big development’, alien vegetation encroachment, human population pressure, climate change impacts resulting in floods, fires and droughts (Lees et al. 2022). We’ve seen the terms ‘eco-anxiety’ and ‘ecological grief’ coined to describe how people with a connection to nature now feel when faced with the loss of something very close to them, something with which there is a real emotional bond (Cunsolo and Ellis 2018). Grief is a powerful emotion: a rip in the fabric of our reality, but unlike grief felt with the passing of a loved one, ecological grief never ends: each tragedy is replaced by the next (Read 2022). The past two years has seen a lot of media attention on mental health. United Nations Secretary General Antonio Guterres warned that psychological suffering will outlast the coronavirus crisis, stating on 13 May 2020: ‘Even when the pandemic is brought under control, grief, anxiety and depression will continue to affect people and communities’. But how did we feel before and how do we feel now? Can we detect a changing pattern of sentiment in the titles and abstracts of some scientific journals? Although those should by their definition be dry and un-emotional, themes in conservation biology may not be, especially if they touch on topics related to extinction risk and environmental degradation. I attempt to answer these self-imposed questions through text mining and sentiment analysis. Text mining is the process of distilling insights from text. Sentiment analysis represents the set of tools to extract an author’s feelings towards a subject; an attempt at extracting an author’s emotional intent from text. It attempts to unlock the emotions from text in a quantitative manner. This article presents a sentiment analysis on the titles and abstract contents from a selection of journals which publish on African ornithology, as well as a set of comparison journals. Naturally, this article will focus on Ostrich: Journal of African Ornithology, but includes other ornithological journals, notably Bird Conservation International and Ibis, which also publish many articles related to ornithology from Africa, and often with themes related to conservation (Lee 2020). Likewise, African Zoology, although ornithological articles there are a minority. For comparison, I also examine the Journal of Avian Biology, which publishes on more dry-themed biological topics, Conservation Biology, and some control journals: Methods in Ecology and Evolution, and Afrika Matematika (expecting these last two to be neutral), and South African Journal of Psychology (expecting this to have more heavily weighted sentiment scores). The methods are in the Appendix 1. Perspective","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How do we feel, African Ornithology? A sentiment analysis search for symptoms of eco-anxiety\",\"authors\":\"Alan T. K. Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.2989/00306525.2022.2114640\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ostrich is co-published by NISC (Pty) Ltd and Informa UK Limited (trading as Taylor & Francis Group) This year the Cape Gannet Morus capensis has been chosen as South Africa’s Bird of the Year. A beautiful coastal bird, I have seen these foraging in large flocks which give the impression they are common and doing well, and so it has been concerning to learn that the species is Endangered, with ongoing population declines on its island colonies. The population is under pressure for food resources, as well as from natural predators, as we learn in Strydom et al. (2022). Koopman (2022) quotes this text as a description from over 100 years ago: ‘The Malagash, as it is called by the Colonists, or Common Gannet of South Africa, frequents, in countless thousands, the whole of our coastline....’. It is certainly countable in 2022 and becoming more so with passing time with fewer and fewer to count. This is a depressing situation, and yet another unfolding ecological tragedy. Learning about Cape Gannet made me sad, but it is not the only thing. Unfortunately, it appears we live in ‘interesting times’ as per the alleged Chinese curse. The past two years have been torrid, and I suspect few have not been affected by inconvenience at least, or the loss of loved ones at worst, due to the global COVID-19 pandemic and associated lockdowns. As I write, the situation in Europe is very unsettled with the invasion of Ukraine by Russia. All this is set against the backdrop of climate change, with a mounting portfolio of associated disasters. Over the last decade we’ve also seen political polarisation, and a backlash against everything deemed to be too ‘left’, into which conservation initiatives are frequently lumped (Scholes 2013). In Africa, we are seeing the loss of natural environments to a combination of urban and agricultural expansion, ‘big development’, alien vegetation encroachment, human population pressure, climate change impacts resulting in floods, fires and droughts (Lees et al. 2022). We’ve seen the terms ‘eco-anxiety’ and ‘ecological grief’ coined to describe how people with a connection to nature now feel when faced with the loss of something very close to them, something with which there is a real emotional bond (Cunsolo and Ellis 2018). Grief is a powerful emotion: a rip in the fabric of our reality, but unlike grief felt with the passing of a loved one, ecological grief never ends: each tragedy is replaced by the next (Read 2022). The past two years has seen a lot of media attention on mental health. United Nations Secretary General Antonio Guterres warned that psychological suffering will outlast the coronavirus crisis, stating on 13 May 2020: ‘Even when the pandemic is brought under control, grief, anxiety and depression will continue to affect people and communities’. But how did we feel before and how do we feel now? Can we detect a changing pattern of sentiment in the titles and abstracts of some scientific journals? Although those should by their definition be dry and un-emotional, themes in conservation biology may not be, especially if they touch on topics related to extinction risk and environmental degradation. I attempt to answer these self-imposed questions through text mining and sentiment analysis. Text mining is the process of distilling insights from text. Sentiment analysis represents the set of tools to extract an author’s feelings towards a subject; an attempt at extracting an author’s emotional intent from text. It attempts to unlock the emotions from text in a quantitative manner. This article presents a sentiment analysis on the titles and abstract contents from a selection of journals which publish on African ornithology, as well as a set of comparison journals. Naturally, this article will focus on Ostrich: Journal of African Ornithology, but includes other ornithological journals, notably Bird Conservation International and Ibis, which also publish many articles related to ornithology from Africa, and often with themes related to conservation (Lee 2020). Likewise, African Zoology, although ornithological articles there are a minority. For comparison, I also examine the Journal of Avian Biology, which publishes on more dry-themed biological topics, Conservation Biology, and some control journals: Methods in Ecology and Evolution, and Afrika Matematika (expecting these last two to be neutral), and South African Journal of Psychology (expecting this to have more heavily weighted sentiment scores). The methods are in the Appendix 1. Perspective\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2989/00306525.2022.2114640\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2989/00306525.2022.2114640","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Ostrich由NISC(Pty)Ltd和Informa UK Limited(交易名称为Taylor&Francis Group)共同出版。今年,Gannet Morus capensis角被选为南非年度鸟类。作为一种美丽的沿海鸟类,我看到这些鸟成群结队地觅食,这给人的印象是它们很常见,而且做得很好,因此,得知该物种处于濒危状态,其岛屿群落的种群数量持续下降,我感到很担忧。正如我们在Strydom等人(2022)中了解到的那样,种群面临着食物资源和天敌的压力。库普曼(2022)引用了这段文字作为100多年前的描述:“殖民者称之为马拉加什人,或南非的共同甘尼特人,经常光顾我们的整个海岸线,成千上万……”。在2022年,它肯定是可以计数的,随着时间的推移,可计数的数量越来越少。这是一个令人沮丧的局面,也是另一场正在上演的生态悲剧。得知甘内特角让我很难过,但这并不是唯一的事情。不幸的是,按照所谓的中国诅咒,我们似乎生活在一个“有趣的时代”。过去两年是炎热的,我怀疑很少有人没有受到全球新冠肺炎大流行和相关封锁造成的不便的影响,最坏的情况是失去亲人。在我写这篇文章的时候,俄罗斯入侵乌克兰使欧洲局势非常不稳定。所有这些都是在气候变化的背景下发生的,相关灾害的组合不断增加。在过去的十年里,我们也看到了政治两极分化,以及对一切被认为过于“左”的东西的强烈反对,保护倡议经常被归为一类(Scholes 2013)。在非洲,我们看到自然环境因城市和农业扩张、“大开发”、外来植被侵占、人口压力、气候变化影响导致洪水、火灾和干旱而丧失(Lees等人,2022)。我们已经看到了“生态焦虑”和“生态悲伤”这两个术语,它们是用来描述与自然有联系的人在面对失去与他们非常亲近的东西时的感受的,与这些东西有着真正的情感纽带(Cunsolo和Ellis,2018)。悲伤是一种强大的情感:它撕裂了我们现实的结构,但与亲人去世时的悲伤不同,生态悲伤永远不会结束:每一场悲剧都会被下一场悲剧所取代(阅读2022)。在过去的两年里,媒体对心理健康进行了大量关注。联合国秘书长安东尼奥·古特雷斯警告说,心理痛苦将持续到冠状病毒危机之后,他在2020年5月13日表示:“即使疫情得到控制,悲伤、焦虑和抑郁也将继续影响人们和社区”。但我们以前的感觉如何,现在的感觉如何?我们能从一些科学期刊的标题和摘要中发现情绪的变化模式吗?尽管根据他们的定义,这些主题应该是枯燥和无情感的,但保护生物学中的主题可能不是,尤其是如果它们涉及与灭绝风险和环境退化有关的主题。我试图通过文本挖掘和情感分析来回答这些自我强加的问题。文本挖掘是从文本中提取见解的过程。情感分析代表了一套工具来提取作者对主题的情感;从文本中提取作者情感意图的尝试。它试图以定量的方式从文本中释放情感。本文对一些发表在非洲鸟类学上的期刊以及一组比较期刊的标题和摘要内容进行了情感分析。当然,这篇文章将聚焦于《鸵鸟:非洲鸟类学杂志》,但也包括其他鸟类学杂志,特别是《国际鸟类保护组织》和《国际鸟类学会》,它们也发表了许多与非洲鸟类学相关的文章,通常主题与保护有关(Lee 2020)。同样,非洲动物学,尽管鸟类学文章也有少数。为了进行比较,我还查阅了《鸟类生物学杂志》(Journal of Avian Biology)和《保护生物学》(Conservation Biology。方法见附录1。态度
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How do we feel, African Ornithology? A sentiment analysis search for symptoms of eco-anxiety
Ostrich is co-published by NISC (Pty) Ltd and Informa UK Limited (trading as Taylor & Francis Group) This year the Cape Gannet Morus capensis has been chosen as South Africa’s Bird of the Year. A beautiful coastal bird, I have seen these foraging in large flocks which give the impression they are common and doing well, and so it has been concerning to learn that the species is Endangered, with ongoing population declines on its island colonies. The population is under pressure for food resources, as well as from natural predators, as we learn in Strydom et al. (2022). Koopman (2022) quotes this text as a description from over 100 years ago: ‘The Malagash, as it is called by the Colonists, or Common Gannet of South Africa, frequents, in countless thousands, the whole of our coastline....’. It is certainly countable in 2022 and becoming more so with passing time with fewer and fewer to count. This is a depressing situation, and yet another unfolding ecological tragedy. Learning about Cape Gannet made me sad, but it is not the only thing. Unfortunately, it appears we live in ‘interesting times’ as per the alleged Chinese curse. The past two years have been torrid, and I suspect few have not been affected by inconvenience at least, or the loss of loved ones at worst, due to the global COVID-19 pandemic and associated lockdowns. As I write, the situation in Europe is very unsettled with the invasion of Ukraine by Russia. All this is set against the backdrop of climate change, with a mounting portfolio of associated disasters. Over the last decade we’ve also seen political polarisation, and a backlash against everything deemed to be too ‘left’, into which conservation initiatives are frequently lumped (Scholes 2013). In Africa, we are seeing the loss of natural environments to a combination of urban and agricultural expansion, ‘big development’, alien vegetation encroachment, human population pressure, climate change impacts resulting in floods, fires and droughts (Lees et al. 2022). We’ve seen the terms ‘eco-anxiety’ and ‘ecological grief’ coined to describe how people with a connection to nature now feel when faced with the loss of something very close to them, something with which there is a real emotional bond (Cunsolo and Ellis 2018). Grief is a powerful emotion: a rip in the fabric of our reality, but unlike grief felt with the passing of a loved one, ecological grief never ends: each tragedy is replaced by the next (Read 2022). The past two years has seen a lot of media attention on mental health. United Nations Secretary General Antonio Guterres warned that psychological suffering will outlast the coronavirus crisis, stating on 13 May 2020: ‘Even when the pandemic is brought under control, grief, anxiety and depression will continue to affect people and communities’. But how did we feel before and how do we feel now? Can we detect a changing pattern of sentiment in the titles and abstracts of some scientific journals? Although those should by their definition be dry and un-emotional, themes in conservation biology may not be, especially if they touch on topics related to extinction risk and environmental degradation. I attempt to answer these self-imposed questions through text mining and sentiment analysis. Text mining is the process of distilling insights from text. Sentiment analysis represents the set of tools to extract an author’s feelings towards a subject; an attempt at extracting an author’s emotional intent from text. It attempts to unlock the emotions from text in a quantitative manner. This article presents a sentiment analysis on the titles and abstract contents from a selection of journals which publish on African ornithology, as well as a set of comparison journals. Naturally, this article will focus on Ostrich: Journal of African Ornithology, but includes other ornithological journals, notably Bird Conservation International and Ibis, which also publish many articles related to ornithology from Africa, and often with themes related to conservation (Lee 2020). Likewise, African Zoology, although ornithological articles there are a minority. For comparison, I also examine the Journal of Avian Biology, which publishes on more dry-themed biological topics, Conservation Biology, and some control journals: Methods in Ecology and Evolution, and Afrika Matematika (expecting these last two to be neutral), and South African Journal of Psychology (expecting this to have more heavily weighted sentiment scores). The methods are in the Appendix 1. Perspective
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Management of Cholesteatoma: Hearing Rehabilitation. Congenital Cholesteatoma. Evaluation of Cholesteatoma. Management of Cholesteatoma: Extension Beyond Middle Ear/Mastoid. Recidivism and Recurrence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1