国家电子医疗战略的成功因素:澳大利亚和德国电子医疗系统的比较分析

Isabella Eigner, A. Hamper, N. Wickramasinghe, F. Bodendorf
{"title":"国家电子医疗战略的成功因素:澳大利亚和德国电子医疗系统的比较分析","authors":"Isabella Eigner, A. Hamper, N. Wickramasinghe, F. Bodendorf","doi":"10.1504/ijnvo.2019.10025314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Australian and German healthcare systems share similar traits in insurance and healthcare management. Both nations have also embarked upon national eHealth strategies to connect stakeholders and enable collaboration in healthcare services throughout their respective countries. While Australia has focused on a platform-based approach initially termed 'personally controlled electronic health record', Germany introduced the 'electronic health card', mandatory for every publicly insured person. This paper presents a comparative analysis of the Australian and German eHealth systems to determine commonalities, barriers and success factors of both strategies. A combined PESTLE/SWOT-analysis is used. Results show the key advantages and obstacles of both approaches and identify relevant areas for successful eHealth implementation.","PeriodicalId":52509,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Success factors for national eHealth strategies: a comparative analysis of the Australian and German eHealth system\",\"authors\":\"Isabella Eigner, A. Hamper, N. Wickramasinghe, F. Bodendorf\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/ijnvo.2019.10025314\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Australian and German healthcare systems share similar traits in insurance and healthcare management. Both nations have also embarked upon national eHealth strategies to connect stakeholders and enable collaboration in healthcare services throughout their respective countries. While Australia has focused on a platform-based approach initially termed 'personally controlled electronic health record', Germany introduced the 'electronic health card', mandatory for every publicly insured person. This paper presents a comparative analysis of the Australian and German eHealth systems to determine commonalities, barriers and success factors of both strategies. A combined PESTLE/SWOT-analysis is used. Results show the key advantages and obstacles of both approaches and identify relevant areas for successful eHealth implementation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52509,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/ijnvo.2019.10025314\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Decision Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/ijnvo.2019.10025314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Decision Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

澳大利亚和德国的医疗保健系统在保险和医疗保健管理方面具有相似的特点。两国还启动了国家电子卫生战略,以联系利益相关者,并在各自国家的医疗保健服务中开展合作。澳大利亚侧重于一种最初被称为“个人控制的电子健康记录”的基于平台的方法,而德国则推出了“电子健康卡”,对每个公共投保人都是强制性的。本文对澳大利亚和德国的电子健康系统进行了比较分析,以确定两种战略的共同点、障碍和成功因素。使用杵/ swot联合分析。结果显示了两种方法的主要优势和障碍,并确定了成功实施电子健康的相关领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Success factors for national eHealth strategies: a comparative analysis of the Australian and German eHealth system
The Australian and German healthcare systems share similar traits in insurance and healthcare management. Both nations have also embarked upon national eHealth strategies to connect stakeholders and enable collaboration in healthcare services throughout their respective countries. While Australia has focused on a platform-based approach initially termed 'personally controlled electronic health record', Germany introduced the 'electronic health card', mandatory for every publicly insured person. This paper presents a comparative analysis of the Australian and German eHealth systems to determine commonalities, barriers and success factors of both strategies. A combined PESTLE/SWOT-analysis is used. Results show the key advantages and obstacles of both approaches and identify relevant areas for successful eHealth implementation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations
International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations Decision Sciences-Information Systems and Management
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: IJNVO is a forum aimed at providing an authoritative refereed source of information in the field of Networking and Virtual Organisations.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation and analysis of classroom teaching quality of art design specialty based on DBT-SVM THE APPLICATION OF CLUSTERING ALGORITHMS IN A NEW MODEL OF KNITTED GARMENT TALENT TRAINING IN THE CONTEXT OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT The Nexus Between Allied Policies of GST And FDI With Dependent Telecom Policies of Licensing and Universal Service in India. Research on government network public opinion monitoring algorithm under the background of sustainable smart government Construction of a GA-RBF-based early warning model for corporate financial risk in the context of sustainable development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1