生物工程技术在边坡稳定中应用的数值研究

Arunava Ray, Ashutosh Kumar Bharati, Harshal Verma, R. Rai, T. Singh
{"title":"生物工程技术在边坡稳定中应用的数值研究","authors":"Arunava Ray, Ashutosh Kumar Bharati, Harshal Verma, R. Rai, T. Singh","doi":"10.1080/17486025.2022.2040605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The bioengineering technique of slope stabilisation, which has been developed as a sustainable alternative to traditional civil engineering structures, requires more scientific research and a good understanding of the factors that influence its effectiveness since many a time it fails to provide the desired outcome. The present study discusses the importance of understanding the variable root distribution and root-soil-slope relationship before implementation. The probabilistic analysis was used to take into account the natural variability of root features, which includes root length, strength, branching and orientation along with heterogeneity of slope material. It was observed that the mean rooting depth plays a vital role in deciding the utility of the bioengineering technique. Though its effect in gentle slopes is negligible, in the case of moderate to steep slopes, it can significantly affect the overall stability. Improper planning can lead to aggravation of the situation leading the slope more vulnerable to failure. Furthermore, the stabilisation using vegetation is best suitable for moderate slope inclinations, and the maximum shear strength increase is obtained for slope inclining around 50°. A gradual reduction in overall stability was observed with the reduction of mean rooting depth and an increase in the spacing of the plants.","PeriodicalId":46470,"journal":{"name":"Geomechanics and Geoengineering-An International Journal","volume":"18 1","pages":"253 - 271"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Numerical study of the utility of bioengineering technique for slope stabilisation\",\"authors\":\"Arunava Ray, Ashutosh Kumar Bharati, Harshal Verma, R. Rai, T. Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17486025.2022.2040605\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The bioengineering technique of slope stabilisation, which has been developed as a sustainable alternative to traditional civil engineering structures, requires more scientific research and a good understanding of the factors that influence its effectiveness since many a time it fails to provide the desired outcome. The present study discusses the importance of understanding the variable root distribution and root-soil-slope relationship before implementation. The probabilistic analysis was used to take into account the natural variability of root features, which includes root length, strength, branching and orientation along with heterogeneity of slope material. It was observed that the mean rooting depth plays a vital role in deciding the utility of the bioengineering technique. Though its effect in gentle slopes is negligible, in the case of moderate to steep slopes, it can significantly affect the overall stability. Improper planning can lead to aggravation of the situation leading the slope more vulnerable to failure. Furthermore, the stabilisation using vegetation is best suitable for moderate slope inclinations, and the maximum shear strength increase is obtained for slope inclining around 50°. A gradual reduction in overall stability was observed with the reduction of mean rooting depth and an increase in the spacing of the plants.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46470,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geomechanics and Geoengineering-An International Journal\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"253 - 271\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geomechanics and Geoengineering-An International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17486025.2022.2040605\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geomechanics and Geoengineering-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17486025.2022.2040605","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要边坡稳定生物工程技术已被开发为传统土木工程结构的可持续替代方案,需要更多的科学研究和对影响其有效性的因素的深入了解,因为它在很多时候都无法提供预期的结果。本研究讨论了在实施前了解可变根系分布和根土坡度关系的重要性。概率分析用于考虑根系特征的自然变异性,包括根系长度、强度、分支和方向以及边坡材料的异质性。结果表明,平均生根深度对决定生物工程技术的实用性起着至关重要的作用。虽然它在缓坡中的影响可以忽略不计,但在中陡坡中,它会显著影响整体稳定性。规划不当会导致情况恶化,使边坡更容易发生破坏。此外,使用植被的稳定最适合中等坡度的斜坡,并且在坡度约为50°的斜坡上获得最大抗剪强度增加。随着平均生根深度的减少和植株间距的增加,观察到总体稳定性逐渐降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Numerical study of the utility of bioengineering technique for slope stabilisation
ABSTRACT The bioengineering technique of slope stabilisation, which has been developed as a sustainable alternative to traditional civil engineering structures, requires more scientific research and a good understanding of the factors that influence its effectiveness since many a time it fails to provide the desired outcome. The present study discusses the importance of understanding the variable root distribution and root-soil-slope relationship before implementation. The probabilistic analysis was used to take into account the natural variability of root features, which includes root length, strength, branching and orientation along with heterogeneity of slope material. It was observed that the mean rooting depth plays a vital role in deciding the utility of the bioengineering technique. Though its effect in gentle slopes is negligible, in the case of moderate to steep slopes, it can significantly affect the overall stability. Improper planning can lead to aggravation of the situation leading the slope more vulnerable to failure. Furthermore, the stabilisation using vegetation is best suitable for moderate slope inclinations, and the maximum shear strength increase is obtained for slope inclining around 50°. A gradual reduction in overall stability was observed with the reduction of mean rooting depth and an increase in the spacing of the plants.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Geomechanics is concerned with the application of the principle of mechanics to earth-materials (namely geo-material). Geoengineering covers a wide range of engineering disciplines related to geo-materials, such as foundation engineering, slope engineering, tunnelling, rock engineering, engineering geology and geo-environmental engineering. Geomechanics and Geoengineering is a major publication channel for research in the areas of soil and rock mechanics, geotechnical and geological engineering, engineering geology, geo-environmental engineering and all geo-material related engineering and science disciplines. The Journal provides an international forum for the exchange of innovative ideas, especially between researchers in Asia and the rest of the world.
期刊最新文献
Analytical evaluation of partially stiffened granular piled raft with the effect of rigidity of bearing stratum A parametric study on deformation behaviour for design of braced excavation in soft clay Effect of leachate and used motor oil on the geotechnical and mechanical characteristics of soils with different mineralogy under different moisture conditions Influence of edge distance on experimental p-y curves for piles near slope Performance of loosely skirted square footing resting on reinforced sand under vertical concentric and eccentric loading
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1