Femtech:月经、激素追踪和企业风险构建的“智能”业务

IF 0.5 3区 社会学 Q3 WOMENS STUDIES Feminist Studies Pub Date : 2023-07-11 DOI:10.1353/fem.2023.a901596
J. Mathiason
{"title":"Femtech:月经、激素追踪和企业风险构建的“智能”业务","authors":"J. Mathiason","doi":"10.1353/fem.2023.a901596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In 2021, startup companies raised $1.9 billion for what entrepreneur Ida Tin calls FemTech, or digital tools designed to promote women’s health including medical wearables, diagnostic kits, and self-tracking apps. Not only is FemTech a booming industry, but it is touted as an innovative, feminist corrective for how biomedical devices have traditionally been designed with a male body in mind. Two such FemTech products are LOONCUP, the world’s first “smart” menstrual cup, and EverlyWell’s line of home-health tests. Rooted in the neoliberal logic of personal responsibility and individual self-mastery, these products purport to empower women by giving them tools to manage their health but, in fact, work by enlisting them to place their bodies under corporate surveillance. By drawing parallels to the 20th century FemCare industry, I show how today’s FemTech companies entice customers by offering new, technological solutions to female body management that promise greater convenience and entry into elusive, upper-middle class lifestyles. Through their marketing they co-opt feminist slogans to sell women’s health products, replacing intersectional feminist critique with neoliberal commodity feminism. Then, when customers use these products, their subjective evaluation of their health is replaced with numerical data (despite questionable accuracy) which is subsequently entered into for-profit databank. This misuse of medical technology is not, however, inevitable. In the final section, I offer a feminist framework for reimagining the FemTech industry by allowing product development to emerge from the daily needs of women, prioritizing outward-facing technologies that conceive of health as environmental and collective, replacing built-in goals with open-ended modeling, and engaging in feminist data practices which emphasize user privacy and the democratization of knowledge.","PeriodicalId":35884,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Studies","volume":"49 1","pages":"118 - 149"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Femtech: The “Smart” Business of Menstruation, Hormone Tracking, and the Corporate Construction of Risk\",\"authors\":\"J. Mathiason\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/fem.2023.a901596\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:In 2021, startup companies raised $1.9 billion for what entrepreneur Ida Tin calls FemTech, or digital tools designed to promote women’s health including medical wearables, diagnostic kits, and self-tracking apps. Not only is FemTech a booming industry, but it is touted as an innovative, feminist corrective for how biomedical devices have traditionally been designed with a male body in mind. Two such FemTech products are LOONCUP, the world’s first “smart” menstrual cup, and EverlyWell’s line of home-health tests. Rooted in the neoliberal logic of personal responsibility and individual self-mastery, these products purport to empower women by giving them tools to manage their health but, in fact, work by enlisting them to place their bodies under corporate surveillance. By drawing parallels to the 20th century FemCare industry, I show how today’s FemTech companies entice customers by offering new, technological solutions to female body management that promise greater convenience and entry into elusive, upper-middle class lifestyles. Through their marketing they co-opt feminist slogans to sell women’s health products, replacing intersectional feminist critique with neoliberal commodity feminism. Then, when customers use these products, their subjective evaluation of their health is replaced with numerical data (despite questionable accuracy) which is subsequently entered into for-profit databank. This misuse of medical technology is not, however, inevitable. In the final section, I offer a feminist framework for reimagining the FemTech industry by allowing product development to emerge from the daily needs of women, prioritizing outward-facing technologies that conceive of health as environmental and collective, replacing built-in goals with open-ended modeling, and engaging in feminist data practices which emphasize user privacy and the democratization of knowledge.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35884,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Feminist Studies\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"118 - 149\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Feminist Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/fem.2023.a901596\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"WOMENS STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminist Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/fem.2023.a901596","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:2021年,创业公司为企业家Ida Tin所称的FemTech筹集了19亿美元,即旨在促进女性健康的数字工具,包括医疗可穿戴设备、诊断试剂盒和自我追踪应用程序。FemTech不仅是一个蓬勃发展的行业,而且被吹捧为一种创新的、女权主义的纠正措施,以纠正传统上设计生物医学设备时考虑到男性身体的方式。两款这样的FemTech产品是世界上第一款“智能”月经杯LOONCUP和EverlyWell的家庭健康测试系列。这些产品植根于个人责任和个人自我掌控的新自由主义逻辑,旨在通过为女性提供管理健康的工具来赋予她们权力,但事实上,通过招募她们将自己的身体置于公司监督之下来发挥作用。通过与20世纪的女性护理行业进行比较,我展示了今天的女性科技公司是如何通过为女性身体管理提供新的技术解决方案来吸引客户的,这些解决方案承诺提供更大的便利,并进入难以捉摸的中上阶层生活方式。通过营销,他们选择女权主义口号来销售女性健康产品,用新自由主义的商品女权主义取代了交叉的女权主义批判。然后,当客户使用这些产品时,他们对健康状况的主观评估被数字数据取代(尽管准确性有问题),这些数据随后被输入营利性数据库。然而,这种对医疗技术的滥用并非不可避免。在最后一节中,我提供了一个女权主义框架,通过允许产品开发从女性的日常需求中脱颖而出,优先考虑将健康视为环境和集体的外向型技术,用开放式建模取代固有目标,重新构想女性科技行业,以及从事强调用户隐私和知识民主化的女权主义数据实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Femtech: The “Smart” Business of Menstruation, Hormone Tracking, and the Corporate Construction of Risk
Abstract:In 2021, startup companies raised $1.9 billion for what entrepreneur Ida Tin calls FemTech, or digital tools designed to promote women’s health including medical wearables, diagnostic kits, and self-tracking apps. Not only is FemTech a booming industry, but it is touted as an innovative, feminist corrective for how biomedical devices have traditionally been designed with a male body in mind. Two such FemTech products are LOONCUP, the world’s first “smart” menstrual cup, and EverlyWell’s line of home-health tests. Rooted in the neoliberal logic of personal responsibility and individual self-mastery, these products purport to empower women by giving them tools to manage their health but, in fact, work by enlisting them to place their bodies under corporate surveillance. By drawing parallels to the 20th century FemCare industry, I show how today’s FemTech companies entice customers by offering new, technological solutions to female body management that promise greater convenience and entry into elusive, upper-middle class lifestyles. Through their marketing they co-opt feminist slogans to sell women’s health products, replacing intersectional feminist critique with neoliberal commodity feminism. Then, when customers use these products, their subjective evaluation of their health is replaced with numerical data (despite questionable accuracy) which is subsequently entered into for-profit databank. This misuse of medical technology is not, however, inevitable. In the final section, I offer a feminist framework for reimagining the FemTech industry by allowing product development to emerge from the daily needs of women, prioritizing outward-facing technologies that conceive of health as environmental and collective, replacing built-in goals with open-ended modeling, and engaging in feminist data practices which emphasize user privacy and the democratization of knowledge.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Feminist Studies
Feminist Studies Social Sciences-Gender Studies
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Pleasures of the Hunt / We Must Be Creatures: Toward an Ecofeminist Hunting Ethic What Hungers Call Us Home? Engaging Autotheory Through Food Legal Landscapes Post-Roe: Shifts in Antiabortion Violence and Implications of the face Act Oasis by Necessity: The Post-Dobbs Landscape in Central Illinois "Brutality and its aftermath": Autotheoretical Engagements with Violence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1