不同牙髓密封剂推出粘结强度评价(比较研究)。

Israa Attash, Wiaam M. O. Al-Ashou
{"title":"不同牙髓密封剂推出粘结强度评价(比较研究)。","authors":"Israa Attash, Wiaam M. O. Al-Ashou","doi":"10.33899/rdenj.2022.130209.1105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim s : The aim of this study was to compare the push-out bond strength values between four different types of sealers. Materials and method: Forty extracted straight, single-rooted, sound human mandibular first premolar teeth were selected for this study. The crown portion of each tooth was decoronated to the level of the cement-enamel junction (CEJ) to standardize the root length to 16 mm. The working length was measured and the canals were instrumented using Nickel-Titanium ProTaper Universal Rotary System up to size F3. The canals were rinsed with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite followed by 17% EDTA, then the samples were divided into four groups (n=10) according to the sealer to be used with F3 gutta-percha. These are (AH Plus, GuttaFlow 2, GuttaFlow Bioseal and MTA Fillapex) sealers. The pushout bond strength test was performed and the data were analyzed using one way ANOVA, and post hoc Duncan’s multiple range tests at (p ≤ 0.05). Results: There was a statistically significant difference in the push-out bond strength among the four sealers’ groups at (p ≤ 0.05). The highest mean value of bond strength (3.605) MPa was shown in the AH Plus group. Bioseal group produced (1.833) MPa followed by (0.822) MPa for GuttaFlow2 group. The lowest value (0.645)","PeriodicalId":33584,"journal":{"name":"AlRafidain Dental Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Push-out Bond Strength Evaluation for Different Endodontic Sealers (A Comparative Study).\",\"authors\":\"Israa Attash, Wiaam M. O. Al-Ashou\",\"doi\":\"10.33899/rdenj.2022.130209.1105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim s : The aim of this study was to compare the push-out bond strength values between four different types of sealers. Materials and method: Forty extracted straight, single-rooted, sound human mandibular first premolar teeth were selected for this study. The crown portion of each tooth was decoronated to the level of the cement-enamel junction (CEJ) to standardize the root length to 16 mm. The working length was measured and the canals were instrumented using Nickel-Titanium ProTaper Universal Rotary System up to size F3. The canals were rinsed with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite followed by 17% EDTA, then the samples were divided into four groups (n=10) according to the sealer to be used with F3 gutta-percha. These are (AH Plus, GuttaFlow 2, GuttaFlow Bioseal and MTA Fillapex) sealers. The pushout bond strength test was performed and the data were analyzed using one way ANOVA, and post hoc Duncan’s multiple range tests at (p ≤ 0.05). Results: There was a statistically significant difference in the push-out bond strength among the four sealers’ groups at (p ≤ 0.05). The highest mean value of bond strength (3.605) MPa was shown in the AH Plus group. Bioseal group produced (1.833) MPa followed by (0.822) MPa for GuttaFlow2 group. The lowest value (0.645)\",\"PeriodicalId\":33584,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AlRafidain Dental Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AlRafidain Dental Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33899/rdenj.2022.130209.1105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AlRafidain Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33899/rdenj.2022.130209.1105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是比较四种不同类型的密封剂之间的推出结合强度值。材料和方法:选择40颗拔除的直立、单根、健全的人下颌第一前磨牙进行本研究。每颗牙的冠部被装饰到水泥-牙釉质交界处(CEJ)的水平,使根长标准化到16毫米。测量工作长度,并使用镍钛ProTaper通用旋转系统测量管至F3尺寸。用2.5%次氯酸钠和17% EDTA分别冲洗根管,然后根据使用F3杜仲胶的封口剂将样品分为4组(n=10)。这些是(AH Plus, GuttaFlow 2, GuttaFlow Bioseal和MTA Fillapex)密封剂。进行推出粘结强度检验,数据分析采用单因素方差分析和事后Duncan 's多极差检验(p≤0.05)。结果:四组间推出粘结强度比较,差异有统计学意义(p≤0.05)。AH +组的结合强度平均值最高,为3.605 MPa。Bioseal组产生(1.833)MPa, GuttaFlow2组产生(0.822)MPa。最低值(0.645)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Push-out Bond Strength Evaluation for Different Endodontic Sealers (A Comparative Study).
Aim s : The aim of this study was to compare the push-out bond strength values between four different types of sealers. Materials and method: Forty extracted straight, single-rooted, sound human mandibular first premolar teeth were selected for this study. The crown portion of each tooth was decoronated to the level of the cement-enamel junction (CEJ) to standardize the root length to 16 mm. The working length was measured and the canals were instrumented using Nickel-Titanium ProTaper Universal Rotary System up to size F3. The canals were rinsed with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite followed by 17% EDTA, then the samples were divided into four groups (n=10) according to the sealer to be used with F3 gutta-percha. These are (AH Plus, GuttaFlow 2, GuttaFlow Bioseal and MTA Fillapex) sealers. The pushout bond strength test was performed and the data were analyzed using one way ANOVA, and post hoc Duncan’s multiple range tests at (p ≤ 0.05). Results: There was a statistically significant difference in the push-out bond strength among the four sealers’ groups at (p ≤ 0.05). The highest mean value of bond strength (3.605) MPa was shown in the AH Plus group. Bioseal group produced (1.833) MPa followed by (0.822) MPa for GuttaFlow2 group. The lowest value (0.645)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Monolithic Zirconia as Permanent Solution for Bruxism (Two years follow up) Effect of Different Natural Herbal Products on Microhardness of Eroded Enamel Surface: An in Vitro Study Biocompatibility of Newly Prepared Nanocalcium Oxide Based Root Canal Sealer (In Vivo study) Effect of Different Natural Herbal Products on Roughness of Eroded Enamel Surface (An in Vitro Study) Assessment of Biphasic Calcium Phosphate mixed with injectable platelet rich fibrin (i-PRF) on healing of surgically created bone defects in a sheep animal model (A Histological Analysis)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1