掌握高等医学引文数据库工具

H. Morokhovets, Y. Lysanets, L. Ostrovska, T. Purdenko
{"title":"掌握高等医学引文数据库工具","authors":"H. Morokhovets, Y. Lysanets, L. Ostrovska, T. Purdenko","doi":"10.31718/MEP.2019.23.3-4.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the contemporary academic setting, the quality of publications and the publication activity of a scientist, educational or research institution are evaluated using a set of scientific metric indicators. There are the following parameters: total citations, total number of links, the Hirsch index, impact factor, g-index, and-10 index. The aim of the paper is to cover the methods of working with the world scientific and metric databases of literature, as well as to explain the essence and algorithms for calculating the major scientific and metric indicators. We used the bibliosemantic research method in order to analyze the relevant scientific literature. The article describes the principles of mastering the tools of international databases Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Mendeley bibliographic manager, ORCID system. The paper focuses on the essence of scientific and metric indicators, calculated by these resources, as well as their scope and possibilities. The authors analyze the positive aspects of using the scientific metrics to determine the influence of a particular author or institution, as well as a number of subjective disadvantages of their widespread adoption in higher education. The modern tools for working with scientific information play a key role in the research activities of scientists, institutions of higher education, research institutions. The quality of publications is determined by a number of scientific metrics, calculated by authoritative scientific literature databases, such as Scopus and Web of Science. The h-indices are calculated in terms of publications in these bases, and serve as qualitative indicators for scientific activity evaluation. Scopus and Web of Science, in addition to their own built-in tools for searching, visualizing, analyzing and tracking data, integrated with the registers of scientists, bibliographic managers, plugins that allow to automate the processes of citation, lists of literature, preparation of publications according to the requirements of a specific edition, work with full-text versions of articles in different formats.","PeriodicalId":32911,"journal":{"name":"Problemi ekologiyi ta meditsini","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MASTERING THE TOOLS OF CITATION DATABASES IN HIGHER MEDICAL EDUCATION\",\"authors\":\"H. Morokhovets, Y. Lysanets, L. Ostrovska, T. Purdenko\",\"doi\":\"10.31718/MEP.2019.23.3-4.11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the contemporary academic setting, the quality of publications and the publication activity of a scientist, educational or research institution are evaluated using a set of scientific metric indicators. There are the following parameters: total citations, total number of links, the Hirsch index, impact factor, g-index, and-10 index. The aim of the paper is to cover the methods of working with the world scientific and metric databases of literature, as well as to explain the essence and algorithms for calculating the major scientific and metric indicators. We used the bibliosemantic research method in order to analyze the relevant scientific literature. The article describes the principles of mastering the tools of international databases Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Mendeley bibliographic manager, ORCID system. The paper focuses on the essence of scientific and metric indicators, calculated by these resources, as well as their scope and possibilities. The authors analyze the positive aspects of using the scientific metrics to determine the influence of a particular author or institution, as well as a number of subjective disadvantages of their widespread adoption in higher education. The modern tools for working with scientific information play a key role in the research activities of scientists, institutions of higher education, research institutions. The quality of publications is determined by a number of scientific metrics, calculated by authoritative scientific literature databases, such as Scopus and Web of Science. The h-indices are calculated in terms of publications in these bases, and serve as qualitative indicators for scientific activity evaluation. Scopus and Web of Science, in addition to their own built-in tools for searching, visualizing, analyzing and tracking data, integrated with the registers of scientists, bibliographic managers, plugins that allow to automate the processes of citation, lists of literature, preparation of publications according to the requirements of a specific edition, work with full-text versions of articles in different formats.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32911,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Problemi ekologiyi ta meditsini\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Problemi ekologiyi ta meditsini\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31718/MEP.2019.23.3-4.11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Problemi ekologiyi ta meditsini","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31718/MEP.2019.23.3-4.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在当代学术环境中,出版物的质量和科学家、教育或研究机构的出版活动是用一套科学度量指标来评估的。参数有:总引用数、总链接数、赫希指数、影响因子、g指数和10指数。本文的目的是涵盖与世界科学和度量文献数据库的工作方法,以及解释计算主要科学和度量指标的本质和算法。运用文献语义学研究方法对相关科学文献进行分析。本文阐述了掌握国际数据库Scopus、Web of Science、谷歌Scholar、Mendeley bibliographic manager、ORCID系统等工具的原则。本文着重讨论了利用这些资源计算的科学指标和计量指标的本质,以及它们的范围和可能性。作者分析了使用科学指标来确定特定作者或机构的影响力的积极方面,以及在高等教育中广泛采用这些指标的一些主观缺点。处理科学信息的现代工具在科学家、高等教育机构、研究机构的研究活动中起着关键作用。出版物的质量是由一些科学指标决定的,这些指标是由权威的科学文献数据库计算出来的,比如Scopus和Web of Science。h指数是根据这些基地的出版物计算的,作为科学活动评价的定性指标。Scopus和Web of Science,除了它们自己内置的搜索、可视化、分析和跟踪数据的工具外,还集成了科学家注册、书目管理器、允许自动引用过程的插件、文献列表、根据特定版本的要求准备出版物,以及不同格式的文章全文版本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
MASTERING THE TOOLS OF CITATION DATABASES IN HIGHER MEDICAL EDUCATION
In the contemporary academic setting, the quality of publications and the publication activity of a scientist, educational or research institution are evaluated using a set of scientific metric indicators. There are the following parameters: total citations, total number of links, the Hirsch index, impact factor, g-index, and-10 index. The aim of the paper is to cover the methods of working with the world scientific and metric databases of literature, as well as to explain the essence and algorithms for calculating the major scientific and metric indicators. We used the bibliosemantic research method in order to analyze the relevant scientific literature. The article describes the principles of mastering the tools of international databases Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Mendeley bibliographic manager, ORCID system. The paper focuses on the essence of scientific and metric indicators, calculated by these resources, as well as their scope and possibilities. The authors analyze the positive aspects of using the scientific metrics to determine the influence of a particular author or institution, as well as a number of subjective disadvantages of their widespread adoption in higher education. The modern tools for working with scientific information play a key role in the research activities of scientists, institutions of higher education, research institutions. The quality of publications is determined by a number of scientific metrics, calculated by authoritative scientific literature databases, such as Scopus and Web of Science. The h-indices are calculated in terms of publications in these bases, and serve as qualitative indicators for scientific activity evaluation. Scopus and Web of Science, in addition to their own built-in tools for searching, visualizing, analyzing and tracking data, integrated with the registers of scientists, bibliographic managers, plugins that allow to automate the processes of citation, lists of literature, preparation of publications according to the requirements of a specific edition, work with full-text versions of articles in different formats.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
ANALYSIS OF THE ACTIVITY INDICATORS OF THE SPORTS MEDICINE SERVICE IN THE POLTAVA REGION FOR 2017-2022 CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF THE INFLUENCE OF CELL WALL ANTIGENS OF STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS ON PHAGOCYTIC CELLS OF THE PERIPHERAL BLOOD IN CHILDREN WITH PURULENT AND INFLAMMATORY DISEASES OF STAPHYLOCOCCAL ETIOLOGY EVALUATION OF THE FUNCTIONAL STATE AND MORPHOLOGY OF THE RETINA IN PATIENTS WITH RHEGMATOGENOUS RETINAL DETACHMENT AFTER SUBTOTAL VITRECTOMY PECULIARITIES OF POSTOPERATIVE PAIN IN THE ELDERLY AND SENILE PATIENTS AT DIFFERENT STAGES OF NOCICEPTION THE RELATIONSHIP OF BREAST CANCER, BIOMINERALIZATION DISORDERS AND BONE METASTASES: A BIBLIOGRAPHICAL ANALYSIS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1