乳腺X线、超声、细针抽吸细胞学和切除活检诊断乳腺病变的比较

Rusab Baig, R. Desai, Mahenaaz Tabassum, M. A. Mughni, Syed Hamza Quadri, Syed Zainuddin Rafai
{"title":"乳腺X线、超声、细针抽吸细胞学和切除活检诊断乳腺病变的比较","authors":"Rusab Baig, R. Desai, Mahenaaz Tabassum, M. A. Mughni, Syed Hamza Quadri, Syed Zainuddin Rafai","doi":"10.47799/pimr.1002.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract\n \n Background\n and Objective\n :\n Problem of invasive tests in breast lesion diagnosis can be addressed by comparing non-invasive tests with final Histopathological diagnosis obtained after excision biopsy. Present study was carried out to study diagnostic utility of mammography, sonography, FNAC compared to excision biopsy for diagnosis of breast lesions\n \n Methods:\n Prospective Observational study was carried out among 81 women with Breast related symptoms. Digital Mammography Machine, ACUSON S3000™ Ultrasound System; FNAC and surgery for excision Biopsy were used. Sensitivity, Specificity, Accuracy, Positive and Negative Predictive values were measured and p<0.05 was considered as statistically significant.\n \n Results:\n Sonography and FNAC composite have sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive values 100.00%, 81.40%, 90.12%, 82.61% and 100.00% respectively. Mammography+FNAC (97.3%) is not as sensitive as Sonography+FNAC (100%), Sonography combined with FNAC is equally sensitive to excision biopsy (100%) and therefore can be used for screening purpose.\n \n Conclusion: Contrary to present guidelines which consider Mammography as most important screening tool for Breast Cancer, combination of Sonography and FNAC can be considered equally reliable.","PeriodicalId":30624,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives In Medical Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Mammography, Sonography, Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology, and Excision Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Breast Lesions\",\"authors\":\"Rusab Baig, R. Desai, Mahenaaz Tabassum, M. A. Mughni, Syed Hamza Quadri, Syed Zainuddin Rafai\",\"doi\":\"10.47799/pimr.1002.11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract\\n \\n Background\\n and Objective\\n :\\n Problem of invasive tests in breast lesion diagnosis can be addressed by comparing non-invasive tests with final Histopathological diagnosis obtained after excision biopsy. Present study was carried out to study diagnostic utility of mammography, sonography, FNAC compared to excision biopsy for diagnosis of breast lesions\\n \\n Methods:\\n Prospective Observational study was carried out among 81 women with Breast related symptoms. Digital Mammography Machine, ACUSON S3000™ Ultrasound System; FNAC and surgery for excision Biopsy were used. Sensitivity, Specificity, Accuracy, Positive and Negative Predictive values were measured and p<0.05 was considered as statistically significant.\\n \\n Results:\\n Sonography and FNAC composite have sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive values 100.00%, 81.40%, 90.12%, 82.61% and 100.00% respectively. Mammography+FNAC (97.3%) is not as sensitive as Sonography+FNAC (100%), Sonography combined with FNAC is equally sensitive to excision biopsy (100%) and therefore can be used for screening purpose.\\n \\n Conclusion: Contrary to present guidelines which consider Mammography as most important screening tool for Breast Cancer, combination of Sonography and FNAC can be considered equally reliable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30624,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perspectives In Medical Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perspectives In Medical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47799/pimr.1002.11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives In Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47799/pimr.1002.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:通过非侵入性检查与乳腺切除活检后的最终组织病理学诊断的比较,可以解决乳腺病变诊断中浸润性检查的问题。本研究旨在探讨乳腺x线摄影、超声、FNAC与乳腺切除活检对乳腺病变的诊断价值。方法:对81例有乳腺相关症状的女性进行前瞻性观察研究。数字乳房x线照相机,ACUSON S3000™超声系统;采用FNAC和手术切除活检。测量敏感性、特异性、准确性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值,以p<0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果:超声与FNAC复合的敏感性、特异性、准确性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为100.00%、81.40%、90.12%、82.61%和100.00%。乳房x线摄影+FNAC(97.3%)的敏感性不及超声+FNAC(100%),超声联合FNAC对切除活检的敏感性相同(100%),可用于筛查。结论:与现行指南认为乳腺x线摄影是乳腺癌最重要的筛查工具相反,超声和FNAC联合检查同样可靠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Mammography, Sonography, Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology, and Excision Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Breast Lesions
Abstract Background and Objective : Problem of invasive tests in breast lesion diagnosis can be addressed by comparing non-invasive tests with final Histopathological diagnosis obtained after excision biopsy. Present study was carried out to study diagnostic utility of mammography, sonography, FNAC compared to excision biopsy for diagnosis of breast lesions Methods: Prospective Observational study was carried out among 81 women with Breast related symptoms. Digital Mammography Machine, ACUSON S3000™ Ultrasound System; FNAC and surgery for excision Biopsy were used. Sensitivity, Specificity, Accuracy, Positive and Negative Predictive values were measured and p<0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results: Sonography and FNAC composite have sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive values 100.00%, 81.40%, 90.12%, 82.61% and 100.00% respectively. Mammography+FNAC (97.3%) is not as sensitive as Sonography+FNAC (100%), Sonography combined with FNAC is equally sensitive to excision biopsy (100%) and therefore can be used for screening purpose. Conclusion: Contrary to present guidelines which consider Mammography as most important screening tool for Breast Cancer, combination of Sonography and FNAC can be considered equally reliable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessment of peripheral lymph node tuberculosis: a prospective study of 24 cases Histopathological study on the spectrum of various sinonasal lesions Socio-demographic correlates and psychosocial stressors among suicide attempters attending a tertiary care general hospital Radiological study of foramen arcuale: implications for screw insertion via posterior arch for fixation of C1 vertebrae in atlantoaxial instability using plain radiograph Artificial Intelligence and Computational Pathology: A comprehensive review of advancements and applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1