一群“传统学派”耳科医生对内镜下镫骨切开术的看法和早期经验。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Ent-Ear Nose & Throat Journal Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2022-03-08 DOI:10.1177/01455613221078183
Mainak Dutta, Sohag Kundu, Bhaskar Ghosh, Pramit Ghosh
{"title":"一群“传统学派”耳科医生对内镜下镫骨切开术的看法和早期经验。","authors":"Mainak Dutta, Sohag Kundu, Bhaskar Ghosh, Pramit Ghosh","doi":"10.1177/01455613221078183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> This paper evaluates endoscopic stapedotomy from the perspectives of a group of 3 surgeons, each of whose experience in endoscopic and microscopic stapedotomy is 3 years and more than 12 years, respectively.<b>Methods:</b> Thirty-four patients clinically diagnosed with stapedial otosclerosis were alternately assigned for unilateral, microscope- and endoscope-assisted stapedotomy following the selection criteria given. Results were evaluated with predetermined epidemiologic, preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative outcome parameters.<b>Results:</b> The microscope group had 12 ears with otosclerosis and the endoscope-assisted group 14. Ears found to have conditions other than otosclerosis at surgery, and patients lost to follow-up were excluded. Apart from the operative time, the difference in the results of none of the parameters was statistically significant in the two groups. The average operative times for microscope- and endoscope-assisted stapedotomy were 63 minutes and 86.5 minutes, respectively, the difference being statistically significant (<i>P</i> < .001).<b>Conclusions:</b> From the perspectives of otologists in differential positions in the learning curve for microscope- and endoscope-assisted stapedotomy, there were no statistically significant differences between the two procedures in the execution of the steps to achieve \"adequate surgical exposure\" and in postoperative outcomes, except for operative time.</p>","PeriodicalId":51041,"journal":{"name":"Ent-Ear Nose & Throat Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"NP679-NP685"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perspectives and early experience on endoscopic stapedotomy from a group of \\\"traditional school\\\" otologists.\",\"authors\":\"Mainak Dutta, Sohag Kundu, Bhaskar Ghosh, Pramit Ghosh\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/01455613221078183\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> This paper evaluates endoscopic stapedotomy from the perspectives of a group of 3 surgeons, each of whose experience in endoscopic and microscopic stapedotomy is 3 years and more than 12 years, respectively.<b>Methods:</b> Thirty-four patients clinically diagnosed with stapedial otosclerosis were alternately assigned for unilateral, microscope- and endoscope-assisted stapedotomy following the selection criteria given. Results were evaluated with predetermined epidemiologic, preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative outcome parameters.<b>Results:</b> The microscope group had 12 ears with otosclerosis and the endoscope-assisted group 14. Ears found to have conditions other than otosclerosis at surgery, and patients lost to follow-up were excluded. Apart from the operative time, the difference in the results of none of the parameters was statistically significant in the two groups. The average operative times for microscope- and endoscope-assisted stapedotomy were 63 minutes and 86.5 minutes, respectively, the difference being statistically significant (<i>P</i> < .001).<b>Conclusions:</b> From the perspectives of otologists in differential positions in the learning curve for microscope- and endoscope-assisted stapedotomy, there were no statistically significant differences between the two procedures in the execution of the steps to achieve \\\"adequate surgical exposure\\\" and in postoperative outcomes, except for operative time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ent-Ear Nose & Throat Journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"NP679-NP685\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ent-Ear Nose & Throat Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/01455613221078183\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/3/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ent-Ear Nose & Throat Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01455613221078183","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/3/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本文从3名外科医生的角度对内镜下镫骨切开术进行了评估,他们在内镜下和显微镜下的镫骨切开手术经验分别为3年和12年以上。方法:根据给定的选择标准,将34例临床诊断为镫骨耳硬化症的患者交替分为单侧、显微镜和内窥镜辅助镫骨切开术。根据预先确定的流行病学、术前、围手术期和术后结果参数对结果进行评估。结果:显微镜组有12耳耳硬化症,内镜辅助组有14耳。在手术中发现耳朵有除耳硬化症以外的其他疾病,并且随访失败的患者被排除在外。除手术时间外,两组的任何参数的结果差异均无统计学意义。显微镜和内窥镜辅助镫骨切开术的平均手术时间分别为63分钟和86.5分钟,差异具有统计学意义(P<.001),除手术时间外,两种手术在实现“充分手术暴露”的步骤执行和术后结果方面没有统计学上的显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Perspectives and early experience on endoscopic stapedotomy from a group of "traditional school" otologists.

Background: This paper evaluates endoscopic stapedotomy from the perspectives of a group of 3 surgeons, each of whose experience in endoscopic and microscopic stapedotomy is 3 years and more than 12 years, respectively.Methods: Thirty-four patients clinically diagnosed with stapedial otosclerosis were alternately assigned for unilateral, microscope- and endoscope-assisted stapedotomy following the selection criteria given. Results were evaluated with predetermined epidemiologic, preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative outcome parameters.Results: The microscope group had 12 ears with otosclerosis and the endoscope-assisted group 14. Ears found to have conditions other than otosclerosis at surgery, and patients lost to follow-up were excluded. Apart from the operative time, the difference in the results of none of the parameters was statistically significant in the two groups. The average operative times for microscope- and endoscope-assisted stapedotomy were 63 minutes and 86.5 minutes, respectively, the difference being statistically significant (P < .001).Conclusions: From the perspectives of otologists in differential positions in the learning curve for microscope- and endoscope-assisted stapedotomy, there were no statistically significant differences between the two procedures in the execution of the steps to achieve "adequate surgical exposure" and in postoperative outcomes, except for operative time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ent-Ear Nose & Throat Journal
Ent-Ear Nose & Throat Journal 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
385
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ear, Nose & Throat Journal provides practical, peer-reviewed original clinical articles, highlighting scientific research relevant to clinical care, and case reports that describe unusual entities or innovative approaches to treatment and case management. ENT Journal utilizes multiple channels to deliver authoritative and timely content that informs, engages, and shapes the industry now and into the future.
期刊最新文献
A rare case of Epstein-Barr virus-positive anaplastic plasmacytoma in the sinonasal tract. Pediatric Post-Cricoid Actinomyces. A Rare Case of Aggressive Metastatic Laryngeal Chondrosarcoma Presenting as Bilateral Necrotizing Pneumonia. A case report: Establishment of a frontal sinus drainage canal and reconstruction of the orbitofrontal region after removal of a giant frontal sinus osteoma. An unusual case of retropharyngeal ectopic parathyroid adenoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1