Afropolitan项目:从休斯顿到阿克拉重新定义黑人、性和文化

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 Q4 SOCIOLOGY Contemporary Sociology-A Journal of Reviews Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1177/00943061231181317
W. McKinney
{"title":"Afropolitan项目:从休斯顿到阿克拉重新定义黑人、性和文化","authors":"W. McKinney","doi":"10.1177/00943061231181317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Crisscrossing the Atlantic between Accra and Houston, Anima Adjepong’s Afropolitan Projects: Redefining Blackness, Sexualities, and Culture from Houston to Accra offers a refreshing engagement with the quotidian practices and politics that enable a new generation of African migrants to find meaning and assert their place in the world. Adjepong’s examination of the emergent Afropolitan subjectivity through the experiences of interlocutors residing in Ghana and the United States challenges assumptions about the nature of diaspora and transnational migration within the African context. Afropolitan Projects recasts migration, its motivations, and its locales on both sides of the Atlantic and thoroughly breaks from the deep historical traumas of the Middle Passage epistemology and more contemporaneous framings that dichotomize African migrants into refugees and upwardly mobile opportunityseekers. Hence, Adjepong’s extensive ethnographic observations in Houston and Accra and critical analyses of material culture and political projects capture the centrality of aesthetics and assemblage of oftentimes contradictory ideologies of sexuality, race, and belonging. Afropolitan Projects is organized into three sections, with Chapters One and Two elaborating the experiences of Afropolitans residing in Houston, Chapters Three and Four focused on those living in Accra, and, finally, Chapters Five and Six tackling the careful negotiation of sexual, gender, race, and class politics in both settings. In Chapter One we are introduced to an ethnically diverse Ghanaian community residing in Houston. Adjepong demonstrates how their interlocutors disrupt disparaging representations of Africa and migrants by forming civic associations that showcase the vibrancy of their ethno-national heritage and alignment with neoliberal American values. Couched in a discourse that lauds diversity and middle-class valorization of work ethic, participation in civic associations adds meaning and structure to contemporary migration experiences and places Afropolitans within the urban Houston landscape. In Chapter Two, Adjepong focuses on the religious projects of the Houston-based Ghanaian community and the alignment of Ghanaian and American theological traditions. Adjepong reveals the limits of Afropolitan inclusivity through vignettes crafted from interviews and observations of outwardly secular organizations that nonetheless serve to restrict subjectivity within an overtly Christian valence, drawing attention to the exclusion of Muslims and sexual minorities. Beginning in Chapter Three, Adjepong pivots to Accra and engages the Afropolitan Ghanaians who chose to return to advance their careers, effect social change, and explore Afropolitan aesthetics in art and culture. To the Afropolitans residing in Accra, the city embodies contradictions that enable them to give form to their transnational subjectivity. Contradictions exist between universality and parochialism, progress and tradition, and international and local perspectives. However, the cosmopolitanism and relative class privilege of Afropolitan returnees hinder the fluidity of their emergence and complicate authentic relationships across class and social divides. In Chapter Four, Adjepong brings their interlocutors’ political and social activism to the fore, largely focusing on initiatives promoting sexual health and inclusivity. Through these endeavors and others, Afropolitan interlocutors envision the possibility for a post-coloniality that positions them as a cultural vanguard bridging the contradictions embedded within the Ghanaian social and political landscape. While such projects establish Afropolitan politics squarely within liberal and at times","PeriodicalId":46889,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Sociology-A Journal of Reviews","volume":"52 1","pages":"315 - 316"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Afropolitan Projects: Redefining Blackness, Sexualities, and Culture from Houston to Accra\",\"authors\":\"W. McKinney\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00943061231181317\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Crisscrossing the Atlantic between Accra and Houston, Anima Adjepong’s Afropolitan Projects: Redefining Blackness, Sexualities, and Culture from Houston to Accra offers a refreshing engagement with the quotidian practices and politics that enable a new generation of African migrants to find meaning and assert their place in the world. Adjepong’s examination of the emergent Afropolitan subjectivity through the experiences of interlocutors residing in Ghana and the United States challenges assumptions about the nature of diaspora and transnational migration within the African context. Afropolitan Projects recasts migration, its motivations, and its locales on both sides of the Atlantic and thoroughly breaks from the deep historical traumas of the Middle Passage epistemology and more contemporaneous framings that dichotomize African migrants into refugees and upwardly mobile opportunityseekers. Hence, Adjepong’s extensive ethnographic observations in Houston and Accra and critical analyses of material culture and political projects capture the centrality of aesthetics and assemblage of oftentimes contradictory ideologies of sexuality, race, and belonging. Afropolitan Projects is organized into three sections, with Chapters One and Two elaborating the experiences of Afropolitans residing in Houston, Chapters Three and Four focused on those living in Accra, and, finally, Chapters Five and Six tackling the careful negotiation of sexual, gender, race, and class politics in both settings. In Chapter One we are introduced to an ethnically diverse Ghanaian community residing in Houston. Adjepong demonstrates how their interlocutors disrupt disparaging representations of Africa and migrants by forming civic associations that showcase the vibrancy of their ethno-national heritage and alignment with neoliberal American values. Couched in a discourse that lauds diversity and middle-class valorization of work ethic, participation in civic associations adds meaning and structure to contemporary migration experiences and places Afropolitans within the urban Houston landscape. In Chapter Two, Adjepong focuses on the religious projects of the Houston-based Ghanaian community and the alignment of Ghanaian and American theological traditions. Adjepong reveals the limits of Afropolitan inclusivity through vignettes crafted from interviews and observations of outwardly secular organizations that nonetheless serve to restrict subjectivity within an overtly Christian valence, drawing attention to the exclusion of Muslims and sexual minorities. Beginning in Chapter Three, Adjepong pivots to Accra and engages the Afropolitan Ghanaians who chose to return to advance their careers, effect social change, and explore Afropolitan aesthetics in art and culture. To the Afropolitans residing in Accra, the city embodies contradictions that enable them to give form to their transnational subjectivity. Contradictions exist between universality and parochialism, progress and tradition, and international and local perspectives. However, the cosmopolitanism and relative class privilege of Afropolitan returnees hinder the fluidity of their emergence and complicate authentic relationships across class and social divides. In Chapter Four, Adjepong brings their interlocutors’ political and social activism to the fore, largely focusing on initiatives promoting sexual health and inclusivity. Through these endeavors and others, Afropolitan interlocutors envision the possibility for a post-coloniality that positions them as a cultural vanguard bridging the contradictions embedded within the Ghanaian social and political landscape. While such projects establish Afropolitan politics squarely within liberal and at times\",\"PeriodicalId\":46889,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary Sociology-A Journal of Reviews\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"315 - 316\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary Sociology-A Journal of Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00943061231181317\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Sociology-A Journal of Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00943061231181317","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

Anima Adjepong的《非洲移民项目:从休斯顿到阿克拉重新定义黑人、性和文化》横跨阿克拉和休斯顿之间的大西洋,为新一代非洲移民找到意义并在世界上确立自己的地位提供了一种与日常实践和政治的全新接触。Adjepong通过居住在加纳和美国的对话者的经历对新出现的非洲裔主体性进行了研究,这对非洲背景下关于散居国外和跨国移民性质的假设提出了挑战。Afropolitan项目重新塑造了移民、移民动机及其在大西洋两岸的位置,彻底打破了中间通道认识论和更同期的框架的深刻历史创伤,这些框架将非洲移民分为难民和向上流动的机会寻求者。因此,Adjepong在休斯顿和阿克拉进行的广泛的人种学观察,以及对物质文化和政治项目的批判性分析,捕捉到了美学的中心地位,以及性、种族和归属等经常矛盾的意识形态的集合。非洲裔项目分为三个部分,第一章和第二章阐述了居住在休斯顿的非洲裔人的经历,第三章和第四章侧重于居住在阿克拉的人,最后,第五章和第六章讨论了在这两种情况下对性、性别、种族和阶级政治的仔细协商。在第一章中,我们介绍了居住在休斯顿的一个种族多元化的加纳社区。Adjepong展示了他们的对话者如何通过成立公民协会来破坏对非洲和移民的贬低,这些协会展示了他们民族遗产的活力以及与新自由主义美国价值观的一致性。参与公民协会为当代移民体验增添了意义和结构,并将非洲裔人置于休斯顿城市景观中。在第二章中,Adjepong重点介绍了休斯顿加纳社区的宗教项目以及加纳和美国神学传统的一致性。Adjepong通过对表面世俗组织的采访和观察,揭示了非洲裔包容性的局限性,尽管如此,这些组织仍在公开的基督教价值观中限制了主观性,引起了人们对穆斯林和性少数群体被排斥的关注。从第三章开始,Adjepong以阿克拉为中心,与非洲裔加纳人接触,他们选择回国推进自己的职业生涯,影响社会变革,并在艺术和文化中探索非洲裔美学。对于居住在阿克拉的非洲裔人来说,这座城市体现了矛盾,使他们能够形成跨国主体性。普遍性与狭隘性、进步性与传统性、国际性与地方性之间存在着矛盾。然而,阿夫罗波利坦回归者的世界主义和相对的阶级特权阻碍了他们出现的流动性,并使跨越阶级和社会鸿沟的真实关系复杂化。在第四章中,Adjepong将对话者的政治和社会激进主义放在首位,主要关注促进性健康和包容性的举措。通过这些努力和其他努力,非洲裔对话者设想了后殖民主义的可能性,将他们定位为弥合加纳社会和政治格局中矛盾的文化先锋。虽然这些项目在自由主义内部建立了非洲政治,有时
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Afropolitan Projects: Redefining Blackness, Sexualities, and Culture from Houston to Accra
Crisscrossing the Atlantic between Accra and Houston, Anima Adjepong’s Afropolitan Projects: Redefining Blackness, Sexualities, and Culture from Houston to Accra offers a refreshing engagement with the quotidian practices and politics that enable a new generation of African migrants to find meaning and assert their place in the world. Adjepong’s examination of the emergent Afropolitan subjectivity through the experiences of interlocutors residing in Ghana and the United States challenges assumptions about the nature of diaspora and transnational migration within the African context. Afropolitan Projects recasts migration, its motivations, and its locales on both sides of the Atlantic and thoroughly breaks from the deep historical traumas of the Middle Passage epistemology and more contemporaneous framings that dichotomize African migrants into refugees and upwardly mobile opportunityseekers. Hence, Adjepong’s extensive ethnographic observations in Houston and Accra and critical analyses of material culture and political projects capture the centrality of aesthetics and assemblage of oftentimes contradictory ideologies of sexuality, race, and belonging. Afropolitan Projects is organized into three sections, with Chapters One and Two elaborating the experiences of Afropolitans residing in Houston, Chapters Three and Four focused on those living in Accra, and, finally, Chapters Five and Six tackling the careful negotiation of sexual, gender, race, and class politics in both settings. In Chapter One we are introduced to an ethnically diverse Ghanaian community residing in Houston. Adjepong demonstrates how their interlocutors disrupt disparaging representations of Africa and migrants by forming civic associations that showcase the vibrancy of their ethno-national heritage and alignment with neoliberal American values. Couched in a discourse that lauds diversity and middle-class valorization of work ethic, participation in civic associations adds meaning and structure to contemporary migration experiences and places Afropolitans within the urban Houston landscape. In Chapter Two, Adjepong focuses on the religious projects of the Houston-based Ghanaian community and the alignment of Ghanaian and American theological traditions. Adjepong reveals the limits of Afropolitan inclusivity through vignettes crafted from interviews and observations of outwardly secular organizations that nonetheless serve to restrict subjectivity within an overtly Christian valence, drawing attention to the exclusion of Muslims and sexual minorities. Beginning in Chapter Three, Adjepong pivots to Accra and engages the Afropolitan Ghanaians who chose to return to advance their careers, effect social change, and explore Afropolitan aesthetics in art and culture. To the Afropolitans residing in Accra, the city embodies contradictions that enable them to give form to their transnational subjectivity. Contradictions exist between universality and parochialism, progress and tradition, and international and local perspectives. However, the cosmopolitanism and relative class privilege of Afropolitan returnees hinder the fluidity of their emergence and complicate authentic relationships across class and social divides. In Chapter Four, Adjepong brings their interlocutors’ political and social activism to the fore, largely focusing on initiatives promoting sexual health and inclusivity. Through these endeavors and others, Afropolitan interlocutors envision the possibility for a post-coloniality that positions them as a cultural vanguard bridging the contradictions embedded within the Ghanaian social and political landscape. While such projects establish Afropolitan politics squarely within liberal and at times
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
202
期刊最新文献
How the Clinic Made Gender: The Medical History of a Transformative Idea Prisons of Debt: The Afterlives of Incarcerated Fathers Working-Class Kids Photographing Childhood: Valuing Care, Reciprocity, Sociality, and Dignity Literature in the Dawn of Sociological Theory: Stories That Are Telling On Expertise: Cultivating Character, Goodwill, and Practical Wisdom
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1