回应性别边界通知:澳大利亚不断发展的监管方法

Christine Gee, A. Tonkin, Sharon Gaby, Veronika Urh, S. Anderson, M. Hardy, Martin Fletcher
{"title":"回应性别边界通知:澳大利亚不断发展的监管方法","authors":"Christine Gee, A. Tonkin, Sharon Gaby, Veronika Urh, S. Anderson, M. Hardy, Martin Fletcher","doi":"10.30770/2572-1852-107.2.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n A sexual boundary violation by a health practitioner has an immense impact on a patient, and the trust and confidence in the health care system and the health care regulator are negatively affected. The Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (Ahpra) and the Medical Board of Australia (MBA) in 2017 commissioned an independent review in response to a specific high-profile case of multiple physician-patient* sexual boundary violations. In response to recommendations for process improvement, Ahpra and the MBA worked to transform the regulatory management of sexual boundary notifications.The purpose of this paper is to explore the structural and cultural changes that have been made to manage sexual boundary violation notifications and lessons learned through the process. Three factors — specialized decision-making, training for investigators and policy and cultural changes — were identified as key elements of the change process. Since the changes in 2017, the rate of immediate regulatory action taken in response to sexual boundary notifications has increased substantially, with a higher proportion of decisions resulting in suspension of a physician’s registration. Further work on the experience of those who are part of the notification process and supporting people to share their stories and experiences through the notification and tribunal process is ongoing.","PeriodicalId":91752,"journal":{"name":"Journal of medical regulation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Responding to Sexual Boundary Notifications: The Evolving Regulatory Approach in Australia\",\"authors\":\"Christine Gee, A. Tonkin, Sharon Gaby, Veronika Urh, S. Anderson, M. Hardy, Martin Fletcher\",\"doi\":\"10.30770/2572-1852-107.2.25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n A sexual boundary violation by a health practitioner has an immense impact on a patient, and the trust and confidence in the health care system and the health care regulator are negatively affected. The Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (Ahpra) and the Medical Board of Australia (MBA) in 2017 commissioned an independent review in response to a specific high-profile case of multiple physician-patient* sexual boundary violations. In response to recommendations for process improvement, Ahpra and the MBA worked to transform the regulatory management of sexual boundary notifications.The purpose of this paper is to explore the structural and cultural changes that have been made to manage sexual boundary violation notifications and lessons learned through the process. Three factors — specialized decision-making, training for investigators and policy and cultural changes — were identified as key elements of the change process. Since the changes in 2017, the rate of immediate regulatory action taken in response to sexual boundary notifications has increased substantially, with a higher proportion of decisions resulting in suspension of a physician’s registration. Further work on the experience of those who are part of the notification process and supporting people to share their stories and experiences through the notification and tribunal process is ongoing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91752,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of medical regulation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of medical regulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30770/2572-1852-107.2.25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of medical regulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30770/2572-1852-107.2.25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

卫生从业者违反性边界会对患者产生巨大影响,对卫生保健系统和卫生保健监管机构的信任和信心也会受到负面影响。2017年,澳大利亚健康从业者监管局(Ahpra)和澳大利亚医学委员会(MBA)委托进行了一项独立审查,以回应一起备受关注的多个医患*性边界侵犯的具体案件。为了回应流程改进的建议,Ahpra和MBA致力于转变性边界通知的监管管理。本文的目的是探讨在管理性侵犯边界通知方面所做的结构和文化变革,以及在这一过程中吸取的教训。三个因素——专业决策、调查人员培训以及政策和文化变革——被确定为变革过程的关键要素。自2017年的变化以来,针对性边界通知立即采取监管行动的比率大幅上升,导致医生注册被暂停的决定比例更高。关于参与通知程序的人的经验以及支持人们通过通知和法庭程序分享他们的故事和经验的进一步工作正在进行中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Responding to Sexual Boundary Notifications: The Evolving Regulatory Approach in Australia
A sexual boundary violation by a health practitioner has an immense impact on a patient, and the trust and confidence in the health care system and the health care regulator are negatively affected. The Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (Ahpra) and the Medical Board of Australia (MBA) in 2017 commissioned an independent review in response to a specific high-profile case of multiple physician-patient* sexual boundary violations. In response to recommendations for process improvement, Ahpra and the MBA worked to transform the regulatory management of sexual boundary notifications.The purpose of this paper is to explore the structural and cultural changes that have been made to manage sexual boundary violation notifications and lessons learned through the process. Three factors — specialized decision-making, training for investigators and policy and cultural changes — were identified as key elements of the change process. Since the changes in 2017, the rate of immediate regulatory action taken in response to sexual boundary notifications has increased substantially, with a higher proportion of decisions resulting in suspension of a physician’s registration. Further work on the experience of those who are part of the notification process and supporting people to share their stories and experiences through the notification and tribunal process is ongoing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Regulating Professions: The Emergence of Professional Self-Regulation in Four Canadian Provinces COVID-denial Invites License Revocation in the UK Regulatory Body Perspectives on Complaints and Disciplinary Action Processes for Health Professionals Physician Well-Being and Patient Safety: The Crossroads to the Best in Medicine What Could (Or Should) Be the Regulatory Response to the Wicked Problem of Climate Change?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1