在大多数人的世界中构思员工的声音:利用受米克·马金顿作品启发的多种知识传统

IF 5.4 2区 管理学 Q1 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR Human Resource Management Journal Pub Date : 2022-09-26 DOI:10.1111/1748-8583.12473
Pauline Dibben, Ian Cunningham, Nikola Bakalov, Huiping Xian
{"title":"在大多数人的世界中构思员工的声音:利用受米克·马金顿作品启发的多种知识传统","authors":"Pauline Dibben,&nbsp;Ian Cunningham,&nbsp;Nikola Bakalov,&nbsp;Huiping Xian","doi":"10.1111/1748-8583.12473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Conceptualisation of voice in the majority world (developing and emerging economies) should avoid simply using the lens of the minority world (advanced economies). Yet, both can benefit from taking a multidisciplinary approach. Marchington was one of the early pioneers of multidisciplinary work on voice in advanced economies. While being fundamentally an industrial relations (IR) scholar who was alert to the influence of power and context, he took a pluralist approach in applying IR ideas to Human Resource Management, exploring empirically why and how workers use voice. This paper is inspired by Marchington's multidisciplinary approach but considers voice within different institutional contexts. Our key research question is, ‘How can majority world conceptions of employee voice enrich our understanding of what voice is for, its outcomes and whom it serves?’ Through interrogating how different intellectual traditions have underpinned work in the majority world (exemplified by South Africa and China) we highlight the need for further theoretical development of the concept of lateral voice and argue that voice should be more closely linked to forms of resistance. Our concluding section uses this analysis to start the re-imagining of voice in minority and majority world contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":47916,"journal":{"name":"Human Resource Management Journal","volume":"33 3","pages":"564-577"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1748-8583.12473","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conceptualising employee voice in the majority world: Using multiple intellectual traditions inspired by the work of Mick Marchington\",\"authors\":\"Pauline Dibben,&nbsp;Ian Cunningham,&nbsp;Nikola Bakalov,&nbsp;Huiping Xian\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1748-8583.12473\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Conceptualisation of voice in the majority world (developing and emerging economies) should avoid simply using the lens of the minority world (advanced economies). Yet, both can benefit from taking a multidisciplinary approach. Marchington was one of the early pioneers of multidisciplinary work on voice in advanced economies. While being fundamentally an industrial relations (IR) scholar who was alert to the influence of power and context, he took a pluralist approach in applying IR ideas to Human Resource Management, exploring empirically why and how workers use voice. This paper is inspired by Marchington's multidisciplinary approach but considers voice within different institutional contexts. Our key research question is, ‘How can majority world conceptions of employee voice enrich our understanding of what voice is for, its outcomes and whom it serves?’ Through interrogating how different intellectual traditions have underpinned work in the majority world (exemplified by South Africa and China) we highlight the need for further theoretical development of the concept of lateral voice and argue that voice should be more closely linked to forms of resistance. Our concluding section uses this analysis to start the re-imagining of voice in minority and majority world contexts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Resource Management Journal\",\"volume\":\"33 3\",\"pages\":\"564-577\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1748-8583.12473\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Resource Management Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1748-8583.12473\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Resource Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1748-8583.12473","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

对多数世界(发展中国家和新兴经济体)的声音进行概念化,应避免简单地使用少数世界(发达经济体)的视角。然而,两者都可以从采取多学科方法中受益。马钦顿是发达经济体中语音多学科研究的早期先驱之一。虽然从根本上来说,他是一位对权力和环境的影响保持警惕的工业关系(IR)学者,但他采取了一种多元化的方法,将工业关系的思想应用于人力资源管理,从经验上探索工人为什么以及如何使用发言权。本文的灵感来自于Marchington的多学科方法,但考虑了不同制度背景下的声音。我们的关键研究问题是,“大多数世界对员工声音的概念如何丰富我们对声音的理解,它的结果以及它为谁服务?”“通过探究不同的知识传统如何在大多数世界(以南非和中国为例)中支撑工作,我们强调了对横向声音概念的进一步理论发展的必要性,并认为声音应该与抵抗形式更紧密地联系在一起。”我们的结语部分使用这一分析开始重新想象少数民族和多数民族世界背景下的声音。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Conceptualising employee voice in the majority world: Using multiple intellectual traditions inspired by the work of Mick Marchington

Conceptualisation of voice in the majority world (developing and emerging economies) should avoid simply using the lens of the minority world (advanced economies). Yet, both can benefit from taking a multidisciplinary approach. Marchington was one of the early pioneers of multidisciplinary work on voice in advanced economies. While being fundamentally an industrial relations (IR) scholar who was alert to the influence of power and context, he took a pluralist approach in applying IR ideas to Human Resource Management, exploring empirically why and how workers use voice. This paper is inspired by Marchington's multidisciplinary approach but considers voice within different institutional contexts. Our key research question is, ‘How can majority world conceptions of employee voice enrich our understanding of what voice is for, its outcomes and whom it serves?’ Through interrogating how different intellectual traditions have underpinned work in the majority world (exemplified by South Africa and China) we highlight the need for further theoretical development of the concept of lateral voice and argue that voice should be more closely linked to forms of resistance. Our concluding section uses this analysis to start the re-imagining of voice in minority and majority world contexts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
10.90%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: Human Resource Management Journal (CABS/AJG 4*) is a globally orientated HRM journal that promotes the understanding of human resource management to academics and practicing managers. We provide an international forum for discussion and debate, and stress the critical importance of people management to wider economic, political and social concerns. Endorsed by the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development, HRMJ is essential reading for everyone involved in personnel management, training, industrial relations, employment and human resource management.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Neuronormativity as ignorant design in human resource management: The case of an unsupportive national context Reflections on achieving anti‐racism in organisations: The role of human resource management scholars and practitioners Gender composition at work and women's career satisfaction: An international study of 35 societies Antecedents and outcomes of enabling HR practices: The paradox of consistency and flexibility
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1