让我们知道!语言/识字计划

Q4 Social Sciences Word of Mouth Pub Date : 2023-02-07 DOI:10.1177/10483950221150052c
C. Westby
{"title":"让我们知道!语言/识字计划","authors":"C. Westby","doi":"10.1177/10483950221150052c","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"children with ASD exhibited the most difficulty on the Quantity 2 and Politeness items and the best performance on Quantity 1 and Relation items. They did, however, have proportionally more difficulty on the Quality items than the TD children; their performance on the Quality items was similar to their performance on the Quantity 2 and Politeness items. The authors concluded that it is likely that children with ASD exhibit a delay in understanding the Gricean maxims, not a disorder.","PeriodicalId":39491,"journal":{"name":"Word of Mouth","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Let’s Know! Language/Literacy Program\",\"authors\":\"C. Westby\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10483950221150052c\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"children with ASD exhibited the most difficulty on the Quantity 2 and Politeness items and the best performance on Quantity 1 and Relation items. They did, however, have proportionally more difficulty on the Quality items than the TD children; their performance on the Quality items was similar to their performance on the Quantity 2 and Politeness items. The authors concluded that it is likely that children with ASD exhibit a delay in understanding the Gricean maxims, not a disorder.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39491,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Word of Mouth\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Word of Mouth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10483950221150052c\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Word of Mouth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10483950221150052c","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

ASD患儿在数量2和礼貌项上表现出最大的困难,在数量1和关系项上表现最好。然而,他们在质量项目上的难度确实比TD儿童大;他们在“质量”项目上的表现与“数量2”和“礼貌”项目上的表现相似。作者得出结论,患有自闭症谱系障碍的儿童很可能在理解格林格言方面表现出延迟,而不是一种障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Let’s Know! Language/Literacy Program
children with ASD exhibited the most difficulty on the Quantity 2 and Politeness items and the best performance on Quantity 1 and Relation items. They did, however, have proportionally more difficulty on the Quality items than the TD children; their performance on the Quality items was similar to their performance on the Quantity 2 and Politeness items. The authors concluded that it is likely that children with ASD exhibit a delay in understanding the Gricean maxims, not a disorder.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Word of Mouth
Word of Mouth Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: ...helps frontline clinicians keep up with the latest trends in working with school-age children. Each 16-page issue of bare-bones, down-to-earth information includes reviews, resources, idea swap, and short bits.
期刊最新文献
Using Conversation to Promote Language for Comprehension Syntactic Factors in Stuttering Bundle of Learning Chatbots and Neurodivergence Learning to Explain and Generalize
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1