{"title":"十字架印与穆尔西里二世的先辈","authors":"D. Campbell","doi":"10.1086/721605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"233 Introduction Genealogies are intentional, reflective (and reflexive) (mis)representations of an individual’s history.1 They operate by objectifying traditional histories, including mythico-historical narratives, which legitimize one’s identity both within a family unit and within society.2 While they can be presented as objective truths, genealogies are not static traditions determined purely by biological realities. They can be renegotiated by members of a lineage (as well as by those who intrude upon the","PeriodicalId":45745,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF NEAR EASTERN STUDIES","volume":"81 1","pages":"233 - 246"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Cruciform Seal and Mursili II’s Immediate Predecessors\",\"authors\":\"D. Campbell\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/721605\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"233 Introduction Genealogies are intentional, reflective (and reflexive) (mis)representations of an individual’s history.1 They operate by objectifying traditional histories, including mythico-historical narratives, which legitimize one’s identity both within a family unit and within society.2 While they can be presented as objective truths, genealogies are not static traditions determined purely by biological realities. They can be renegotiated by members of a lineage (as well as by those who intrude upon the\",\"PeriodicalId\":45745,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF NEAR EASTERN STUDIES\",\"volume\":\"81 1\",\"pages\":\"233 - 246\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF NEAR EASTERN STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/721605\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF NEAR EASTERN STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/721605","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Cruciform Seal and Mursili II’s Immediate Predecessors
233 Introduction Genealogies are intentional, reflective (and reflexive) (mis)representations of an individual’s history.1 They operate by objectifying traditional histories, including mythico-historical narratives, which legitimize one’s identity both within a family unit and within society.2 While they can be presented as objective truths, genealogies are not static traditions determined purely by biological realities. They can be renegotiated by members of a lineage (as well as by those who intrude upon the
期刊介绍:
Devoted to an examination of the civilizations of the Near East, the Journal of Near Eastern Studies has for 125 years published contributions from scholars of international reputation on the archaeology, art, history, languages, literatures, and religions of the Near East. Founded in 1884 as Hebraica, the journal was renamed twice over the course of the following century, each name change reflecting the growth and expansion of the fields covered by the publication. In 1895 it became the American Journal of Semitic Languages and Literatures, and in 1942 it received its present designation, the Journal of Near Eastern Studies. From an original emphasis on Old Testament studies in the nineteenth century.