现代性与希望问题:托马斯·阿奎那的一些观点

IF 0.1 0 PHILOSOPHY Kritike-An Online Journal of Philosophy Pub Date : 2021-12-15 DOI:10.25138/15.3/a3
Jovito V. Carino
{"title":"现代性与希望问题:托马斯·阿奎那的一些观点","authors":"Jovito V. Carino","doi":"10.25138/15.3/a3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": I dwell on the question of hope qua a critique of modernity and theology’s role in this, arguing that authentic hope cannot but include a theological horizon that is necessary for a humane and liberative social imaginary. Two insights are drawn from such: a critique of modernity is not exhausted by a historicist discourse, and an alternative reading o f Aquinas’ theology of hope may be developed via a discussion of the crisis of critical theory. I forward my argument in three parts: 1) I rehearse an account of the congeniality between modernity and religion developed by Charles Taylor; 2) I discuss the distinction between Taylor’s perspective and the historicist reading of modernity; and 3) I try to reconstruct Aquinas’ theology of hope within the framework of its reflexive unity with the two other theological virtues, faith, and charity. I use the three virtues’ grounding in grace’s radicality to counter the dominant historicist bias in interpreting both the question of hope and modernity. The whole discussion promises to be an alternative reading of modernity and Aquinas’ theology of hope , guided by the question: What different account of modernity and hope can be drawn from a re- reading of Thomas Aquinas’ theology?","PeriodicalId":41978,"journal":{"name":"Kritike-An Online Journal of Philosophy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modernity and the Question of Hope: Some Perspectives through Thomas Aquinas\",\"authors\":\"Jovito V. Carino\",\"doi\":\"10.25138/15.3/a3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": I dwell on the question of hope qua a critique of modernity and theology’s role in this, arguing that authentic hope cannot but include a theological horizon that is necessary for a humane and liberative social imaginary. Two insights are drawn from such: a critique of modernity is not exhausted by a historicist discourse, and an alternative reading o f Aquinas’ theology of hope may be developed via a discussion of the crisis of critical theory. I forward my argument in three parts: 1) I rehearse an account of the congeniality between modernity and religion developed by Charles Taylor; 2) I discuss the distinction between Taylor’s perspective and the historicist reading of modernity; and 3) I try to reconstruct Aquinas’ theology of hope within the framework of its reflexive unity with the two other theological virtues, faith, and charity. I use the three virtues’ grounding in grace’s radicality to counter the dominant historicist bias in interpreting both the question of hope and modernity. The whole discussion promises to be an alternative reading of modernity and Aquinas’ theology of hope , guided by the question: What different account of modernity and hope can be drawn from a re- reading of Thomas Aquinas’ theology?\",\"PeriodicalId\":41978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kritike-An Online Journal of Philosophy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kritike-An Online Journal of Philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25138/15.3/a3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kritike-An Online Journal of Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25138/15.3/a3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

:我详述了希望的问题,这是对现代性和神学在其中的作用的批判,认为真正的希望只能包括一个神学视野,这对于一个人道和解放的社会想象是必要的。从中可以得出两个见解:对现代性的批判并没有被历史主义话语所耗尽,而对阿奎那的希望神学的另一种解读可以通过对批判理论危机的讨论来发展。我将我的论点分为三个部分:1)我排练了查尔斯·泰勒对现代性与宗教之间的契合性的描述;2) 我讨论了泰勒的视角与历史主义对现代性的解读之间的区别;3)我试图在阿奎那的希望神学与信仰和慈善这两种其他神学美德的反射性统一的框架内重建阿奎那的神学。我用三种美德在恩典的激进主义中的基础来对抗在解释希望和现代性问题时占主导地位的历史主义偏见。整个讨论将是对现代性和阿奎那的希望神学的另一种解读,并以这样一个问题为指导:重读托马斯·阿奎那的神学,可以对现代性与希望做出什么不同的解释?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Modernity and the Question of Hope: Some Perspectives through Thomas Aquinas
: I dwell on the question of hope qua a critique of modernity and theology’s role in this, arguing that authentic hope cannot but include a theological horizon that is necessary for a humane and liberative social imaginary. Two insights are drawn from such: a critique of modernity is not exhausted by a historicist discourse, and an alternative reading o f Aquinas’ theology of hope may be developed via a discussion of the crisis of critical theory. I forward my argument in three parts: 1) I rehearse an account of the congeniality between modernity and religion developed by Charles Taylor; 2) I discuss the distinction between Taylor’s perspective and the historicist reading of modernity; and 3) I try to reconstruct Aquinas’ theology of hope within the framework of its reflexive unity with the two other theological virtues, faith, and charity. I use the three virtues’ grounding in grace’s radicality to counter the dominant historicist bias in interpreting both the question of hope and modernity. The whole discussion promises to be an alternative reading of modernity and Aquinas’ theology of hope , guided by the question: What different account of modernity and hope can be drawn from a re- reading of Thomas Aquinas’ theology?
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Birds of the Air, Lilies of the Field: Revisiting Animality in Heidegger through Derrida and Kierkegaard Beyond Instrumentalism: Exploring the Affordance Construal of Technology in Heidegger The Zhuangist Primitivist Attitude Towards Technology: Further Questions for Thinking about Technological Orientation Fides et Ratio and the Evolution of the Thomistic Philosophic Tradition The Fountain Outside Heidegger's Hut, Black Forest
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1