波罗的海东部新石器时代的沉船和复合鱼钩。别列佐沃2号(俄罗斯西北部卡累利阿地峡)的板岩工艺品。

R. I. Muravev, E. Tkach, D. Gerasimov
{"title":"波罗的海东部新石器时代的沉船和复合鱼钩。别列佐沃2号(俄罗斯西北部卡累利阿地峡)的板岩工艺品。","authors":"R. I. Muravev, E. Tkach, D. Gerasimov","doi":"10.31577/szausav.2021.suppl.2.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Representative collection of slate fishing inventory was obtained from Beresovo 2 archaeological site in the Karelian Isthmus, North-West Russia. This material is attributed to the Middle-Late Neolithic, 4th ka BC. Series of typologically pronounced tools display variety of fishing equipment and imply diversified methods of fishing. Technological context allows discussing advantages of soft and foliated slate for making fishing and hunting equipment, and connections between bone and slate processing technologies. Slate artefacts were well-presented in the Eastern Fennoscandia, including the Karelian Isthmus, during the whole Stone Age. They also were in use later, in the Middle Ages and up to the Early Modern period. Such a long-term technological tradition was based on availability of this raw material in the regions with lack of local flint outcrops; and also on its physical characteristics that made slate good for processing using knapping, flaking, sawing and finally grinding (polishing) techniques. Different kinds of slate raw material were used within the industry, and they could be used for making implements of different categories. Slate sinkers and fishing hook parts are known in the Neolithic archaeological contexts of the Eastern part of the Gulf of Finland and particularly on the Karelian Isthmus for more than a century. Julius Ailio described a fishing rod sinker from the former Finnish municipality Kaukola on the Karelian Isthmus which he called “Angelsenker” (Ailio 1909, fig. 41 – 43; pl. I: 50). Sakari Pälsi published six beautifully crafted stems of various types, found in the same area, including one with a drilled hole (Pälsi 1915, pl. XI: 1 – 6). Similar artefacts were found in the Neolithic sites that were excavated and studied in Finland in the first half of the 20th century in Finnish provinces Northern and Southern Karelia, including the Karelian Isthmus. Rapid increasing of amount of slate artefacts including fishing hooks and line-sinkers in Finland and Karelia associates with Middle Neolithic Typical Comb Ware culture, the 1st half of the 4th ka BC (Núñez 1998, 112). Fishing tools were rather often discussed in archaeological literature within the general problematic concerning prehistoric subsistence strategies, in relation with fishing methods and osteological collections from archaeological sites (e.g. Äyräpää 1950; Carpelan 1999; Mökkönen 2001; Nurminen 2007; Núñez 2009; Pälsi 1915; Ukkonen 2004). But until the beginning of the 21st century there were no special studies on slate fishing tools. Typology of slate fishing tools for the territory of the Karelian Isthmus and entire Finland was developed by Eero Naskali in the MA. Thesis at the Department of Archaeology, University of Helsinki (Naskali 2004). A large collection of slate artefacts was obtained from a multiperiod archaeological site Berezovo 2 that has been completely studied in 2018 with 1700 sq.m excavation area (Gerasimov/Tkach/Goncharova 2018). It is situated in the Karelian Isthmus, at the North-West shore of the Ladoga Lake, close to the famous archaeological sites in Kaukola parish, nowadays Sevastyanovo village in the Leningrad region, Russia (Fig. 1). Archaeological finds of typologically pronounced types indicate that several cultural contexts were represented at the site (Late Mesolithic – 7 – 6 ka BC; Middle to Late Neolithic and Eneolithic – 4–beginning of the 3 ka BC), single artefacts of later eras up to the Modern time were also found. RoMAN I. MUR AVEV – EVGENIA S. TK ACH – DMITR I y V. GER ASIMoV 200 The site was located on a sandy terrace 25 m a.s.l. at the southern slope of a fluvial-glacial hill. According to the local shoreline chronology (e.g. Saarnisto 2008) the terrace could be formed during the ancient Ancylus Lake transgression maximum about 8500 cal BC. After that time the terrace was available and attracting for settling, as the Ladoga Lake shoreline was in several meters from the terrace edge till the Neva River breakthrough about 1200 cal BC, and the site location was at the southern shore of an island 1 x 1 km in size. In the most part of the site area the finds were obtained from the sandy-gravel fluvial-glacial sediments, where they penetrated from the habitation surface in the past. There were several structures (ancient pits, hearths, remains of one dwelling) in the central part of the terrace with a lens of sorted sand. They mainly contained Middle and Late Neolithic contexts. It is worthwhile to clarify the differences in the regional periodization systems that are used within the discussing territory. In the Finnish periodization the Late Neolithic covers the third millennium BC, while in the North-West Russia the same time relates to the Eneolithic or the Early Metal Age (Nordqvist 2018, 51, fig. 11). Representative series of slate fishing tools from the site can be considered as a part of the Late Neolithic archaeological context basing on the reference material; and allow discussing typology and technology of this specific category of artefacts. The slate assemblage contains more than 1100 artefacts, total weight over 4 kg. It consists of series of projectile points, chopping tools (adzes, shaft hole axe, different kinds of miniature adzes), and also piercers, knife-like tools, pendants and some other categories. Fishing tools – sinkers and composite fishing hooks – make a significant category of artefacts. Besides the ready-made tools, numerous preforms, fragments of unfinished blanks and raw bars were found – they make about one half of the whole slate assemblage from the site. Finds were documented with a laser total station, which allowed to determine accurately location coordinates for 391 slate artefacts found in situ. In addition, during the field work, after parsing the layer with a small digging tool, whole soil was sifted through a sieve with a 3.5 mm mesh according to units 1 x 1 m (in some cases 0.5 x 0.5 m) and to arbitrary layers. The soil from the defined artificial structures was sifted separately. Sifting added 770 pieces of slate finds – mainly small fragments. Fig. 1. Berezovo 2. Location of settlement and workshop. SINKERS AND CoMPoSITE FISHING HooKS IN THE NEoLITHIC oF EASTERN BALTIC 201 Slate finds were stratigraphically distributed through four arbitrary layers in a decreasing order, while the thickness of the cultural layer was up to 40 cm. The thickness of an arbitrary layer was 5 – 7 cm and could vary when followed a surface of a distinguished lithological layer. The most of the finds were concentrated in the first (534 pieces) and the second (363 pieces) arbitrary layers. The third layer included only 78 slate finds, and just 24 were found in the fourth. oNE HUNDRED yEARS oF TyPoLoGy AND CLASSIFICATIoN General criteria for classification of slate fishing tools are mainly convinced, but defining the function of an artefact may vary depending on a stage of treatment and on different morphological characteristics. Frequent fragmentation of artefacts, as well as variety in shape, size and morphological elements make difficult their typological definition and interpretation. Also preservation of organic materials in the Stone Age assemblages of the studied region – unburnt bone, wood, resin, threads – is very bad, which minimizes the opportunity to find a complete composite fishing hook or fishing gear. Nevertheless the 10.5 thousand years old fishing net with floats and sinkers was found in the former Antrea parish in Karelian Isthmus (Pälsi 1920). The first steps to classify slate fishing hooks from Finland and Karelia, including the Karelian Isthmus, were taken by the famous Finnish archaeologist S. Pälsi (1915, 134). This typology described all the kinds of Neolithic fishing hooks known to the time, including composite tools. According to Pälsi, slate stems of composite hooks belonged to continuous typological series. Basing on analysis of morphology of stems with elongated and pointed upper end Pälsi suggested that the shape of the slate tools repeated the shape of those made of wood and bone in the earlier times (Pälsi 1915, 135). Five types of stems from the Latvian Neolithic contexts were defined by Ilga A. Zagorska basing on crossection shape and morphology of the lower part of the objects (Zagorska 1991, 54). This classification included not only slate artefacts, but fishing tools of other different materials (bone, antler, animal teeth) – all together 205 stems of composite fishing hooks (Zagorska 1991, 55, fig. 5). Stems of composite fishing hooks were found as surface finds on the shores of the Lubāns Lake and the Big Ludza Lake, as well as in the Zvejnieki burial ground, at the settlements Zvejnieki II, Riņņukalns and Abora I. Also spines were found in the same contexts but more rear. Spines are of small size, they often have sloped or extended lower part. A number of them bear traces of binding, which indicates that these points were not independent tools, but made parts of a composite hooks (Zagorska 1991, 56). Classification by E. Naskali (2004) was developed basing on collections of surface finds and excavations made in Finland in the beginning of the 20th century. The work remained unpublished and, therefore, little known. Besides the Naskali’s classification is the most recent one, it also considers the largest amount of material from a big territory. 91 stems and 222 sinkers were analysed in the study, about a half of the items originate from the Southern Finland and from the Karelian Isthmus (former Finnish, nowadays Russian territory). Thus the classification was based on the materials that are the most relevant for comparing with Berezovo 2 collection in geographical, chronological and cultural sense. E. Naskali distinguished three types of sinkers, each of them was divided in two subtypes; and four types of composite hook stems. Slate spines for composite fishing hooks were not considered in the typology:","PeriodicalId":41838,"journal":{"name":"Studijne Zvesti Archeologickeho Ustavu Slovenskej Akademie Vied","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sinkers and composite fishing hooks in the Neolithic of Eastern Baltic. Slate artefacts from Berezovo 2 (Karelian Isthmus, North-West Russia).\",\"authors\":\"R. I. Muravev, E. Tkach, D. Gerasimov\",\"doi\":\"10.31577/szausav.2021.suppl.2.13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Representative collection of slate fishing inventory was obtained from Beresovo 2 archaeological site in the Karelian Isthmus, North-West Russia. This material is attributed to the Middle-Late Neolithic, 4th ka BC. Series of typologically pronounced tools display variety of fishing equipment and imply diversified methods of fishing. Technological context allows discussing advantages of soft and foliated slate for making fishing and hunting equipment, and connections between bone and slate processing technologies. Slate artefacts were well-presented in the Eastern Fennoscandia, including the Karelian Isthmus, during the whole Stone Age. They also were in use later, in the Middle Ages and up to the Early Modern period. Such a long-term technological tradition was based on availability of this raw material in the regions with lack of local flint outcrops; and also on its physical characteristics that made slate good for processing using knapping, flaking, sawing and finally grinding (polishing) techniques. Different kinds of slate raw material were used within the industry, and they could be used for making implements of different categories. Slate sinkers and fishing hook parts are known in the Neolithic archaeological contexts of the Eastern part of the Gulf of Finland and particularly on the Karelian Isthmus for more than a century. Julius Ailio described a fishing rod sinker from the former Finnish municipality Kaukola on the Karelian Isthmus which he called “Angelsenker” (Ailio 1909, fig. 41 – 43; pl. I: 50). Sakari Pälsi published six beautifully crafted stems of various types, found in the same area, including one with a drilled hole (Pälsi 1915, pl. XI: 1 – 6). Similar artefacts were found in the Neolithic sites that were excavated and studied in Finland in the first half of the 20th century in Finnish provinces Northern and Southern Karelia, including the Karelian Isthmus. Rapid increasing of amount of slate artefacts including fishing hooks and line-sinkers in Finland and Karelia associates with Middle Neolithic Typical Comb Ware culture, the 1st half of the 4th ka BC (Núñez 1998, 112). Fishing tools were rather often discussed in archaeological literature within the general problematic concerning prehistoric subsistence strategies, in relation with fishing methods and osteological collections from archaeological sites (e.g. Äyräpää 1950; Carpelan 1999; Mökkönen 2001; Nurminen 2007; Núñez 2009; Pälsi 1915; Ukkonen 2004). But until the beginning of the 21st century there were no special studies on slate fishing tools. Typology of slate fishing tools for the territory of the Karelian Isthmus and entire Finland was developed by Eero Naskali in the MA. Thesis at the Department of Archaeology, University of Helsinki (Naskali 2004). A large collection of slate artefacts was obtained from a multiperiod archaeological site Berezovo 2 that has been completely studied in 2018 with 1700 sq.m excavation area (Gerasimov/Tkach/Goncharova 2018). It is situated in the Karelian Isthmus, at the North-West shore of the Ladoga Lake, close to the famous archaeological sites in Kaukola parish, nowadays Sevastyanovo village in the Leningrad region, Russia (Fig. 1). Archaeological finds of typologically pronounced types indicate that several cultural contexts were represented at the site (Late Mesolithic – 7 – 6 ka BC; Middle to Late Neolithic and Eneolithic – 4–beginning of the 3 ka BC), single artefacts of later eras up to the Modern time were also found. RoMAN I. MUR AVEV – EVGENIA S. TK ACH – DMITR I y V. GER ASIMoV 200 The site was located on a sandy terrace 25 m a.s.l. at the southern slope of a fluvial-glacial hill. According to the local shoreline chronology (e.g. Saarnisto 2008) the terrace could be formed during the ancient Ancylus Lake transgression maximum about 8500 cal BC. After that time the terrace was available and attracting for settling, as the Ladoga Lake shoreline was in several meters from the terrace edge till the Neva River breakthrough about 1200 cal BC, and the site location was at the southern shore of an island 1 x 1 km in size. In the most part of the site area the finds were obtained from the sandy-gravel fluvial-glacial sediments, where they penetrated from the habitation surface in the past. There were several structures (ancient pits, hearths, remains of one dwelling) in the central part of the terrace with a lens of sorted sand. They mainly contained Middle and Late Neolithic contexts. It is worthwhile to clarify the differences in the regional periodization systems that are used within the discussing territory. In the Finnish periodization the Late Neolithic covers the third millennium BC, while in the North-West Russia the same time relates to the Eneolithic or the Early Metal Age (Nordqvist 2018, 51, fig. 11). Representative series of slate fishing tools from the site can be considered as a part of the Late Neolithic archaeological context basing on the reference material; and allow discussing typology and technology of this specific category of artefacts. The slate assemblage contains more than 1100 artefacts, total weight over 4 kg. It consists of series of projectile points, chopping tools (adzes, shaft hole axe, different kinds of miniature adzes), and also piercers, knife-like tools, pendants and some other categories. Fishing tools – sinkers and composite fishing hooks – make a significant category of artefacts. Besides the ready-made tools, numerous preforms, fragments of unfinished blanks and raw bars were found – they make about one half of the whole slate assemblage from the site. Finds were documented with a laser total station, which allowed to determine accurately location coordinates for 391 slate artefacts found in situ. In addition, during the field work, after parsing the layer with a small digging tool, whole soil was sifted through a sieve with a 3.5 mm mesh according to units 1 x 1 m (in some cases 0.5 x 0.5 m) and to arbitrary layers. The soil from the defined artificial structures was sifted separately. Sifting added 770 pieces of slate finds – mainly small fragments. Fig. 1. Berezovo 2. Location of settlement and workshop. SINKERS AND CoMPoSITE FISHING HooKS IN THE NEoLITHIC oF EASTERN BALTIC 201 Slate finds were stratigraphically distributed through four arbitrary layers in a decreasing order, while the thickness of the cultural layer was up to 40 cm. The thickness of an arbitrary layer was 5 – 7 cm and could vary when followed a surface of a distinguished lithological layer. The most of the finds were concentrated in the first (534 pieces) and the second (363 pieces) arbitrary layers. The third layer included only 78 slate finds, and just 24 were found in the fourth. oNE HUNDRED yEARS oF TyPoLoGy AND CLASSIFICATIoN General criteria for classification of slate fishing tools are mainly convinced, but defining the function of an artefact may vary depending on a stage of treatment and on different morphological characteristics. Frequent fragmentation of artefacts, as well as variety in shape, size and morphological elements make difficult their typological definition and interpretation. Also preservation of organic materials in the Stone Age assemblages of the studied region – unburnt bone, wood, resin, threads – is very bad, which minimizes the opportunity to find a complete composite fishing hook or fishing gear. Nevertheless the 10.5 thousand years old fishing net with floats and sinkers was found in the former Antrea parish in Karelian Isthmus (Pälsi 1920). The first steps to classify slate fishing hooks from Finland and Karelia, including the Karelian Isthmus, were taken by the famous Finnish archaeologist S. Pälsi (1915, 134). This typology described all the kinds of Neolithic fishing hooks known to the time, including composite tools. According to Pälsi, slate stems of composite hooks belonged to continuous typological series. Basing on analysis of morphology of stems with elongated and pointed upper end Pälsi suggested that the shape of the slate tools repeated the shape of those made of wood and bone in the earlier times (Pälsi 1915, 135). Five types of stems from the Latvian Neolithic contexts were defined by Ilga A. Zagorska basing on crossection shape and morphology of the lower part of the objects (Zagorska 1991, 54). This classification included not only slate artefacts, but fishing tools of other different materials (bone, antler, animal teeth) – all together 205 stems of composite fishing hooks (Zagorska 1991, 55, fig. 5). Stems of composite fishing hooks were found as surface finds on the shores of the Lubāns Lake and the Big Ludza Lake, as well as in the Zvejnieki burial ground, at the settlements Zvejnieki II, Riņņukalns and Abora I. Also spines were found in the same contexts but more rear. Spines are of small size, they often have sloped or extended lower part. A number of them bear traces of binding, which indicates that these points were not independent tools, but made parts of a composite hooks (Zagorska 1991, 56). Classification by E. Naskali (2004) was developed basing on collections of surface finds and excavations made in Finland in the beginning of the 20th century. The work remained unpublished and, therefore, little known. Besides the Naskali’s classification is the most recent one, it also considers the largest amount of material from a big territory. 91 stems and 222 sinkers were analysed in the study, about a half of the items originate from the Southern Finland and from the Karelian Isthmus (former Finnish, nowadays Russian territory). Thus the classification was based on the materials that are the most relevant for comparing with Berezovo 2 collection in geographical, chronological and cultural sense. E. Naskali distinguished three types of sinkers, each of them was divided in two subtypes; and four types of composite hook stems. Slate spines for composite fishing hooks were not considered in the typology:\",\"PeriodicalId\":41838,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studijne Zvesti Archeologickeho Ustavu Slovenskej Akademie Vied\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studijne Zvesti Archeologickeho Ustavu Slovenskej Akademie Vied\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31577/szausav.2021.suppl.2.13\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studijne Zvesti Archeologickeho Ustavu Slovenskej Akademie Vied","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31577/szausav.2021.suppl.2.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据参考资料,该遗址具有代表性的板岩捕鱼工具系列可被视为新石器时代晚期考古背景的一部分;并允许讨论这一特定类别人工制品的类型和技术。板岩组合包含1100多件文物,总重量超过4公斤。它包括一系列射点、切割工具(广告、轴孔斧、不同类型的微型广告),以及穿孔器、类刀工具、吊坠和其他一些类别。打捞工具——下沉器和复合鱼钩——是一个重要的人工制品类别。除了现成的工具外,还发现了许多预制件、未完成的坯料碎片和未加工的棒材——它们构成了该遗址整个板岩组合的大约一半。通过激光全站仪记录了这些发现,可以准确地确定391件现场发现的板岩文物的位置坐标。此外,在野外作业过程中,在用小型挖掘工具解析该层后,根据单位1 x 1 m(在某些情况下为0.5 x 0.5 m),通过3.5 mm网眼的筛子将整个土壤筛至任意层。对已确定的人工结构中的土壤进行单独筛选。筛选增加了770块板岩,主要是小碎片。图1。别列佐沃2。定居点和车间的位置。东部BALTIC的新石器时代的沉船和CoMPoSITE捕鱼圈201板岩的发现在地层上按递减顺序分布在四个任意层中,而文化层的厚度高达40厘米。任意层的厚度为5–7厘米,当跟随一个独特的岩性层的表面时,厚度可能会发生变化。大部分发现集中在第一层(534件)和第二层(363件)的任意层。第三层仅发现78块板岩,第四层仅发现24块。TyPoLoGy和分类的一百年主要相信板岩捕鱼工具分类的一般标准,但根据处理阶段和不同的形态特征,对人工制品功能的定义可能会有所不同。人工制品的频繁碎片化,以及形状、大小和形态元素的多样性,使其难以进行类型学定义和解释。此外,研究区域石器时代组合中的有机材料——未燃烧的骨头、木材、树脂、丝线——的保存非常糟糕,这最大限度地减少了找到完整的复合鱼钩或渔具的机会。尽管如此,在卡累利阿地峡的前Antrea教区(Pälsi 1920)发现了有1050万年历史的带浮子和沉降片的渔网。芬兰著名考古学家S.Pälsi(1915134)首次对芬兰和卡累利阿(包括卡累利亚地峡)的板岩鱼钩进行了分类。这种类型学描述了当时已知的所有新石器时代的鱼钩,包括复合工具。根据Pälsi,复合钩的板岩茎属于连续的类型系列。Pälsi通过对上端细长而尖的茎的形态分析,认为板岩工具的形状与早期木制和骨制工具的形状重复(Pälsi 1915135)。Ilga A.Zagorska根据物体下部的横截面形状和形态,定义了拉脱维亚新石器时代背景下的五种类型的茎(Zagorska1991,54)。这一分类不仅包括板岩制品,还包括其他不同材料的捕鱼工具(骨头、鹿角、动物牙齿)——总共205根复合鱼钩(Zagorska 1991,55,图5)。在Lubāns湖和Big Ludza湖的岸边,以及Zvejnieki墓地、Zvejnie ki II、Riņ罷łukalns和Abora I定居点的地表发现了复合鱼钩茎。在同样的环境中也发现了刺,但更多的是在后方。脊柱体积较小,通常有倾斜或延伸的下部。其中一些带有捆绑痕迹,这表明这些点不是独立的工具,而是复合钩子的一部分(Zagorska 1991,56)。E.Naskali(2004)的分类是根据20世纪初在芬兰进行的地表发现和挖掘的收集而制定的。这部作品一直未出版,因此鲜为人知。除了纳斯卡利分类法是最新的分类法外,它还考虑了来自大领土的最大数量的物质。研究中分析了91根树干和222个伸卡球,其中约一半来自芬兰南部和卡累利阿地峡(前芬兰,现为俄罗斯领土)。因此,该分类是基于在地理、时间和文化意义上与Berezovo 2收藏进行比较最相关的材料。E
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sinkers and composite fishing hooks in the Neolithic of Eastern Baltic. Slate artefacts from Berezovo 2 (Karelian Isthmus, North-West Russia).
Representative collection of slate fishing inventory was obtained from Beresovo 2 archaeological site in the Karelian Isthmus, North-West Russia. This material is attributed to the Middle-Late Neolithic, 4th ka BC. Series of typologically pronounced tools display variety of fishing equipment and imply diversified methods of fishing. Technological context allows discussing advantages of soft and foliated slate for making fishing and hunting equipment, and connections between bone and slate processing technologies. Slate artefacts were well-presented in the Eastern Fennoscandia, including the Karelian Isthmus, during the whole Stone Age. They also were in use later, in the Middle Ages and up to the Early Modern period. Such a long-term technological tradition was based on availability of this raw material in the regions with lack of local flint outcrops; and also on its physical characteristics that made slate good for processing using knapping, flaking, sawing and finally grinding (polishing) techniques. Different kinds of slate raw material were used within the industry, and they could be used for making implements of different categories. Slate sinkers and fishing hook parts are known in the Neolithic archaeological contexts of the Eastern part of the Gulf of Finland and particularly on the Karelian Isthmus for more than a century. Julius Ailio described a fishing rod sinker from the former Finnish municipality Kaukola on the Karelian Isthmus which he called “Angelsenker” (Ailio 1909, fig. 41 – 43; pl. I: 50). Sakari Pälsi published six beautifully crafted stems of various types, found in the same area, including one with a drilled hole (Pälsi 1915, pl. XI: 1 – 6). Similar artefacts were found in the Neolithic sites that were excavated and studied in Finland in the first half of the 20th century in Finnish provinces Northern and Southern Karelia, including the Karelian Isthmus. Rapid increasing of amount of slate artefacts including fishing hooks and line-sinkers in Finland and Karelia associates with Middle Neolithic Typical Comb Ware culture, the 1st half of the 4th ka BC (Núñez 1998, 112). Fishing tools were rather often discussed in archaeological literature within the general problematic concerning prehistoric subsistence strategies, in relation with fishing methods and osteological collections from archaeological sites (e.g. Äyräpää 1950; Carpelan 1999; Mökkönen 2001; Nurminen 2007; Núñez 2009; Pälsi 1915; Ukkonen 2004). But until the beginning of the 21st century there were no special studies on slate fishing tools. Typology of slate fishing tools for the territory of the Karelian Isthmus and entire Finland was developed by Eero Naskali in the MA. Thesis at the Department of Archaeology, University of Helsinki (Naskali 2004). A large collection of slate artefacts was obtained from a multiperiod archaeological site Berezovo 2 that has been completely studied in 2018 with 1700 sq.m excavation area (Gerasimov/Tkach/Goncharova 2018). It is situated in the Karelian Isthmus, at the North-West shore of the Ladoga Lake, close to the famous archaeological sites in Kaukola parish, nowadays Sevastyanovo village in the Leningrad region, Russia (Fig. 1). Archaeological finds of typologically pronounced types indicate that several cultural contexts were represented at the site (Late Mesolithic – 7 – 6 ka BC; Middle to Late Neolithic and Eneolithic – 4–beginning of the 3 ka BC), single artefacts of later eras up to the Modern time were also found. RoMAN I. MUR AVEV – EVGENIA S. TK ACH – DMITR I y V. GER ASIMoV 200 The site was located on a sandy terrace 25 m a.s.l. at the southern slope of a fluvial-glacial hill. According to the local shoreline chronology (e.g. Saarnisto 2008) the terrace could be formed during the ancient Ancylus Lake transgression maximum about 8500 cal BC. After that time the terrace was available and attracting for settling, as the Ladoga Lake shoreline was in several meters from the terrace edge till the Neva River breakthrough about 1200 cal BC, and the site location was at the southern shore of an island 1 x 1 km in size. In the most part of the site area the finds were obtained from the sandy-gravel fluvial-glacial sediments, where they penetrated from the habitation surface in the past. There were several structures (ancient pits, hearths, remains of one dwelling) in the central part of the terrace with a lens of sorted sand. They mainly contained Middle and Late Neolithic contexts. It is worthwhile to clarify the differences in the regional periodization systems that are used within the discussing territory. In the Finnish periodization the Late Neolithic covers the third millennium BC, while in the North-West Russia the same time relates to the Eneolithic or the Early Metal Age (Nordqvist 2018, 51, fig. 11). Representative series of slate fishing tools from the site can be considered as a part of the Late Neolithic archaeological context basing on the reference material; and allow discussing typology and technology of this specific category of artefacts. The slate assemblage contains more than 1100 artefacts, total weight over 4 kg. It consists of series of projectile points, chopping tools (adzes, shaft hole axe, different kinds of miniature adzes), and also piercers, knife-like tools, pendants and some other categories. Fishing tools – sinkers and composite fishing hooks – make a significant category of artefacts. Besides the ready-made tools, numerous preforms, fragments of unfinished blanks and raw bars were found – they make about one half of the whole slate assemblage from the site. Finds were documented with a laser total station, which allowed to determine accurately location coordinates for 391 slate artefacts found in situ. In addition, during the field work, after parsing the layer with a small digging tool, whole soil was sifted through a sieve with a 3.5 mm mesh according to units 1 x 1 m (in some cases 0.5 x 0.5 m) and to arbitrary layers. The soil from the defined artificial structures was sifted separately. Sifting added 770 pieces of slate finds – mainly small fragments. Fig. 1. Berezovo 2. Location of settlement and workshop. SINKERS AND CoMPoSITE FISHING HooKS IN THE NEoLITHIC oF EASTERN BALTIC 201 Slate finds were stratigraphically distributed through four arbitrary layers in a decreasing order, while the thickness of the cultural layer was up to 40 cm. The thickness of an arbitrary layer was 5 – 7 cm and could vary when followed a surface of a distinguished lithological layer. The most of the finds were concentrated in the first (534 pieces) and the second (363 pieces) arbitrary layers. The third layer included only 78 slate finds, and just 24 were found in the fourth. oNE HUNDRED yEARS oF TyPoLoGy AND CLASSIFICATIoN General criteria for classification of slate fishing tools are mainly convinced, but defining the function of an artefact may vary depending on a stage of treatment and on different morphological characteristics. Frequent fragmentation of artefacts, as well as variety in shape, size and morphological elements make difficult their typological definition and interpretation. Also preservation of organic materials in the Stone Age assemblages of the studied region – unburnt bone, wood, resin, threads – is very bad, which minimizes the opportunity to find a complete composite fishing hook or fishing gear. Nevertheless the 10.5 thousand years old fishing net with floats and sinkers was found in the former Antrea parish in Karelian Isthmus (Pälsi 1920). The first steps to classify slate fishing hooks from Finland and Karelia, including the Karelian Isthmus, were taken by the famous Finnish archaeologist S. Pälsi (1915, 134). This typology described all the kinds of Neolithic fishing hooks known to the time, including composite tools. According to Pälsi, slate stems of composite hooks belonged to continuous typological series. Basing on analysis of morphology of stems with elongated and pointed upper end Pälsi suggested that the shape of the slate tools repeated the shape of those made of wood and bone in the earlier times (Pälsi 1915, 135). Five types of stems from the Latvian Neolithic contexts were defined by Ilga A. Zagorska basing on crossection shape and morphology of the lower part of the objects (Zagorska 1991, 54). This classification included not only slate artefacts, but fishing tools of other different materials (bone, antler, animal teeth) – all together 205 stems of composite fishing hooks (Zagorska 1991, 55, fig. 5). Stems of composite fishing hooks were found as surface finds on the shores of the Lubāns Lake and the Big Ludza Lake, as well as in the Zvejnieki burial ground, at the settlements Zvejnieki II, Riņņukalns and Abora I. Also spines were found in the same contexts but more rear. Spines are of small size, they often have sloped or extended lower part. A number of them bear traces of binding, which indicates that these points were not independent tools, but made parts of a composite hooks (Zagorska 1991, 56). Classification by E. Naskali (2004) was developed basing on collections of surface finds and excavations made in Finland in the beginning of the 20th century. The work remained unpublished and, therefore, little known. Besides the Naskali’s classification is the most recent one, it also considers the largest amount of material from a big territory. 91 stems and 222 sinkers were analysed in the study, about a half of the items originate from the Southern Finland and from the Karelian Isthmus (former Finnish, nowadays Russian territory). Thus the classification was based on the materials that are the most relevant for comparing with Berezovo 2 collection in geographical, chronological and cultural sense. E. Naskali distinguished three types of sinkers, each of them was divided in two subtypes; and four types of composite hook stems. Slate spines for composite fishing hooks were not considered in the typology:
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: The Študijné zvesti AÚ SAV journal publishes studies focused on the topics of archaeology from prehistory to the Middle Ages, anthropology, archaeobotany, archaeozoology, archaeometry, geophysics, numismatics, applied geodetic and 3D methods. Published works deal with results of field archaeological activities (investigations, surveys, aerial archaeology), analyses, preliminary and partial evaluations, methodology, and registers of sites and finds.
期刊最新文献
Výpovedné možnosti rímsko-provinciálnej keramiky na pohrebiskách z Moravy Čtyřúhelníková ohrazení na laténských nekropolích v Čechách a na Moravě ve světle nálezů z Lochenic a Nebovid Strieborné predmety z germánskych sídlisk na juhozápadnom Slovensku. Doklady prítomnosti kvádskej nobility? Militáriá zo stavebného komplexu z doby rímskej v Stupave Die spätantike quadische Residenz in Cífer-Pác. Rekonstruktion der Bauentwicklung
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1