影响二级重症监护病房诊断为COVID-19患者死亡率的危险因素评估:单中心回顾性研究

Q4 Medicine Anestezi Dergisi Pub Date : 2023-01-30 DOI:10.54875/jarss.2023.98705
Selin Erel, Dilek Yenigün, Naciye Türk Özterlemez
{"title":"影响二级重症监护病房诊断为COVID-19患者死亡率的危险因素评估:单中心回顾性研究","authors":"Selin Erel, Dilek Yenigün, Naciye Türk Özterlemez","doi":"10.54875/jarss.2023.98705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: In the early stages of the worldwide coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, there aren’t many secondary intensive care unit publications. In our study, it was aimed to calculate the mortality rate and to determine the factors affecting mortality by retrospectively evaluating the data of COVID-19 patients hospitalized in a secondary intensive care unit. Methods: The files and records of patients aged 18 years and older who were positive for reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and followed in the secondary COVID-19 intensive care unit between January 2020 and July 2021, and their records in the hospital information system, were evaluated retrospectively. Demographic data, laboratory parameters, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) scores and clinical data of the patients were recorded. The data of living and deceased patients were compared. Regression analysis was performed for data with risk factors. Results: Archive records of a total of 227 patients were reviewed. The all cause mortality rate was 53.3%, and the median length of stay in the intensive care unit was 5 years. There was a significant difference in age (p<0.001), need for invasive mechanical ventilation (p<0.001), hospitalization saturation (p=0.016), ferritin (p<0.001), D-Dimer p(<0.001), APACHE II (p<0.001) and SOFA (p<0.001) scores between the living and deceased patient groups. Conclusion: Due to the increased number of patients and workload at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, patient follow-up was carried out under difficult conditions in all intensive care units, especially in the secondary care units. In this period, we think that easily accessible biomarkers that can be used to predict mortality in secondary intensive care units may play a role in planning the treatment and referral processes of patients, and may have positive effects on patient outcomes by using the facilities more efficiently. Keywords: COVID-19, intensive care unit, mortality, risk factor","PeriodicalId":36000,"journal":{"name":"Anestezi Dergisi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Risk Factors Affecting Mortality in Patients with the Diagnosis of COVID-19 in the Secondary Intensive Care Unit: A Single Center Retrospective Study\",\"authors\":\"Selin Erel, Dilek Yenigün, Naciye Türk Özterlemez\",\"doi\":\"10.54875/jarss.2023.98705\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: In the early stages of the worldwide coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, there aren’t many secondary intensive care unit publications. In our study, it was aimed to calculate the mortality rate and to determine the factors affecting mortality by retrospectively evaluating the data of COVID-19 patients hospitalized in a secondary intensive care unit. Methods: The files and records of patients aged 18 years and older who were positive for reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and followed in the secondary COVID-19 intensive care unit between January 2020 and July 2021, and their records in the hospital information system, were evaluated retrospectively. Demographic data, laboratory parameters, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) scores and clinical data of the patients were recorded. The data of living and deceased patients were compared. Regression analysis was performed for data with risk factors. Results: Archive records of a total of 227 patients were reviewed. The all cause mortality rate was 53.3%, and the median length of stay in the intensive care unit was 5 years. There was a significant difference in age (p<0.001), need for invasive mechanical ventilation (p<0.001), hospitalization saturation (p=0.016), ferritin (p<0.001), D-Dimer p(<0.001), APACHE II (p<0.001) and SOFA (p<0.001) scores between the living and deceased patient groups. Conclusion: Due to the increased number of patients and workload at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, patient follow-up was carried out under difficult conditions in all intensive care units, especially in the secondary care units. In this period, we think that easily accessible biomarkers that can be used to predict mortality in secondary intensive care units may play a role in planning the treatment and referral processes of patients, and may have positive effects on patient outcomes by using the facilities more efficiently. Keywords: COVID-19, intensive care unit, mortality, risk factor\",\"PeriodicalId\":36000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anestezi Dergisi\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anestezi Dergisi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54875/jarss.2023.98705\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anestezi Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54875/jarss.2023.98705","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)全球大流行的早期阶段,二级重症监护病房的出版物并不多。本研究通过回顾性评价二级重症监护病房住院的COVID-19患者资料,计算死亡率并确定影响死亡率的因素。方法:回顾性分析2020年1月至2021年7月在第二重症监护病房逆转录聚合酶链反应阳性并随访的18岁及以上患者的档案和记录,以及他们在医院信息系统中的记录。记录患者的人口学资料、实验室参数、顺序器官衰竭评估(SOFA)和急性生理与慢性健康评估II (APACHE II)评分及临床资料。比较在世和已故患者的数据。对有危险因素的资料进行回归分析。结果:共回顾了227例患者的档案记录。全因死亡率为53.3%,重症监护病房的中位住院时间为5年。在年龄(p<0.001)、有创机械通气需求(p<0.001)、住院饱和度(p=0.016)、铁蛋白(p<0.001)、d -二聚体p(<0.001)、APACHE II (p<0.001)和SOFA (p<0.001)评分方面,两组患者存在显著差异。结论:由于COVID-19大流行开始时患者数量和工作量增加,所有重症监护病房,特别是二级监护病房都在困难的条件下进行了患者随访。在此期间,我们认为易于获取的生物标志物可用于预测二级重症监护病房的死亡率,可能在规划患者的治疗和转诊过程中发挥作用,并可能通过更有效地利用设施对患者的预后产生积极影响。关键词:COVID-19;重症监护病房;死亡率
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of Risk Factors Affecting Mortality in Patients with the Diagnosis of COVID-19 in the Secondary Intensive Care Unit: A Single Center Retrospective Study
Objective: In the early stages of the worldwide coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, there aren’t many secondary intensive care unit publications. In our study, it was aimed to calculate the mortality rate and to determine the factors affecting mortality by retrospectively evaluating the data of COVID-19 patients hospitalized in a secondary intensive care unit. Methods: The files and records of patients aged 18 years and older who were positive for reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and followed in the secondary COVID-19 intensive care unit between January 2020 and July 2021, and their records in the hospital information system, were evaluated retrospectively. Demographic data, laboratory parameters, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) scores and clinical data of the patients were recorded. The data of living and deceased patients were compared. Regression analysis was performed for data with risk factors. Results: Archive records of a total of 227 patients were reviewed. The all cause mortality rate was 53.3%, and the median length of stay in the intensive care unit was 5 years. There was a significant difference in age (p<0.001), need for invasive mechanical ventilation (p<0.001), hospitalization saturation (p=0.016), ferritin (p<0.001), D-Dimer p(<0.001), APACHE II (p<0.001) and SOFA (p<0.001) scores between the living and deceased patient groups. Conclusion: Due to the increased number of patients and workload at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, patient follow-up was carried out under difficult conditions in all intensive care units, especially in the secondary care units. In this period, we think that easily accessible biomarkers that can be used to predict mortality in secondary intensive care units may play a role in planning the treatment and referral processes of patients, and may have positive effects on patient outcomes by using the facilities more efficiently. Keywords: COVID-19, intensive care unit, mortality, risk factor
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anestezi Dergisi
Anestezi Dergisi Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊最新文献
Perioperative Hypothermia and Associated Factors: A Prospective Cohort Study Evaluation of the Knowledge, Skills and Practices on Rapid Sequence Intubation of Physicians Working in Anesthesiology and Reanimation Clinics in Turkey: Survey Study Indispensable for Anesthesia and Intensive Care Units: End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide and Capnography: A Bibliometric Analysis during 1980-2022 Inadequancy and Differences about the Attitudes in Pain Control of Cancer Patients: Assessment of Algology Department Acute Hepatic Injury Following Cardiac Surgery: Retrospective Observational Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1