急性冠状动脉综合征患者的临床特征和住院管理策略:2016年至2021年中国2096家经认可的胸痛中心的结果

Q4 Medicine Cardiology Plus Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.1097/CP9.0000000000000032
Linjie Li, Xin Zhou, Z. Jin, G. A, Pengfei Sun, Zhuoqun Wang, Yong-le Li, Chengyi Xu, X. Su, Qing Yang, Y. Huo
{"title":"急性冠状动脉综合征患者的临床特征和住院管理策略:2016年至2021年中国2096家经认可的胸痛中心的结果","authors":"Linjie Li, Xin Zhou, Z. Jin, G. A, Pengfei Sun, Zhuoqun Wang, Yong-le Li, Chengyi Xu, X. Su, Qing Yang, Y. Huo","doi":"10.1097/CP9.0000000000000032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and purpose: The Chest Pain Center accreditation project was launched in 2011 in China as a nationwide effort to improve clinical management of acute chest pain patients. In this study, we summarize the clinical characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of patients undergoing treatment for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in Chest Pain Centers in China. Methods: Data were based on the Chinese Cardiovascular Association (CCA) Database-Chest Pain Center of 1,745,118 ACS patients admitted at 2,096 accredited Chest Pain Center between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2021. Patient characteristics, time delays, treatment, and outcomes were analyzed using descriptive analysis. Results: The final analysis included a total of 1,745,118 patients, 699,476 patients (40.1%) with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), 349,572 (20.0%) with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), and 696,070 (39.9%) with unstable angina (UA). Electrocardiogram (ECG) was conducted in 89.4% of the patients within 10 min after first medical contact. For STEMI patients, the median door-to-wire crossing time was 72.1 (53.1 to 91.9) min and the median first medical contact-to-needle time was 32.3 (23.8 to 58.6) min. In-hospital mortality was 2.0% in the overall analysis, 3.6% for STEMI, 2.1% for NSTEMI, and 0.3% for UA. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was conducted in 62.8% of STEMI patients, with increasing rate in grade I and II hospitals over the 6-year study period. Patients treated with thrombolysis had significantly higher mortality than those treated with PCI and thrombolysis combined with PCI. The development of Chest Pain Centers varied substantially across geographic regions. Conclusions: Based on CCA Database-Chest Pain Center, the current study provided an overall description of the clinical characteristics of ACS patients in China. The results on management pattern and in-hospital outcomes of STEMI patients identified important areas for further improvement in ACS patient management in China.","PeriodicalId":52908,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology Plus","volume":"7 1","pages":"192 - 199"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical characteristics and in-hospital management strategies in patients with acute coronary syndrome: results from 2,096 accredited Chest Pain Centers in China from 2016 to 2021\",\"authors\":\"Linjie Li, Xin Zhou, Z. Jin, G. A, Pengfei Sun, Zhuoqun Wang, Yong-le Li, Chengyi Xu, X. Su, Qing Yang, Y. Huo\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CP9.0000000000000032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and purpose: The Chest Pain Center accreditation project was launched in 2011 in China as a nationwide effort to improve clinical management of acute chest pain patients. In this study, we summarize the clinical characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of patients undergoing treatment for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in Chest Pain Centers in China. Methods: Data were based on the Chinese Cardiovascular Association (CCA) Database-Chest Pain Center of 1,745,118 ACS patients admitted at 2,096 accredited Chest Pain Center between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2021. Patient characteristics, time delays, treatment, and outcomes were analyzed using descriptive analysis. Results: The final analysis included a total of 1,745,118 patients, 699,476 patients (40.1%) with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), 349,572 (20.0%) with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), and 696,070 (39.9%) with unstable angina (UA). Electrocardiogram (ECG) was conducted in 89.4% of the patients within 10 min after first medical contact. For STEMI patients, the median door-to-wire crossing time was 72.1 (53.1 to 91.9) min and the median first medical contact-to-needle time was 32.3 (23.8 to 58.6) min. In-hospital mortality was 2.0% in the overall analysis, 3.6% for STEMI, 2.1% for NSTEMI, and 0.3% for UA. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was conducted in 62.8% of STEMI patients, with increasing rate in grade I and II hospitals over the 6-year study period. Patients treated with thrombolysis had significantly higher mortality than those treated with PCI and thrombolysis combined with PCI. The development of Chest Pain Centers varied substantially across geographic regions. Conclusions: Based on CCA Database-Chest Pain Center, the current study provided an overall description of the clinical characteristics of ACS patients in China. The results on management pattern and in-hospital outcomes of STEMI patients identified important areas for further improvement in ACS patient management in China.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52908,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiology Plus\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"192 - 199\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiology Plus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CP9.0000000000000032\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology Plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CP9.0000000000000032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:胸痛中心认证项目于2011年在中国启动,旨在提高急性胸痛患者的临床管理水平。在这项研究中,我们总结了在中国胸痛中心接受急性冠脉综合征(ACS)治疗的患者的临床特征和住院结果。方法:数据基于2016年1月1日至2021年12月31日期间在2096家认可的胸痛中心收治的1,745,118名ACS患者的中国心血管协会(CCA)数据库-胸痛中心。采用描述性分析对患者特征、时间延迟、治疗和结果进行分析。结果:最终分析共纳入1,745,118例患者,ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI) 699,476例(40.1%),非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI) 349,572例(20.0%),不稳定型心绞痛(UA) 696,070例(39.9%)。89.4%的患者在首次医疗接触后10分钟内进行心电图检查。STEMI患者从门到线穿过的中位时间为72.1分钟(53.1 - 91.9)分钟,首次医疗接触到针的中位时间为32.3分钟(23.8 - 58.6)分钟。总体分析的住院死亡率为2.0%,STEMI为3.6%,NSTEMI为2.1%,UA为0.3%。62.8%的STEMI患者接受了经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI),在6年的研究期间,这一比例在一、二级医院有所上升。溶栓治疗的患者死亡率明显高于PCI和溶栓联合PCI治疗的患者。胸痛中心的发展在不同的地理区域差异很大。结论:基于CCA胸痛中心数据库,本研究对中国ACS患者的临床特征进行了全面的描述。STEMI患者的管理模式和住院结局的结果确定了中国ACS患者管理进一步改善的重要领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical characteristics and in-hospital management strategies in patients with acute coronary syndrome: results from 2,096 accredited Chest Pain Centers in China from 2016 to 2021
Background and purpose: The Chest Pain Center accreditation project was launched in 2011 in China as a nationwide effort to improve clinical management of acute chest pain patients. In this study, we summarize the clinical characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of patients undergoing treatment for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in Chest Pain Centers in China. Methods: Data were based on the Chinese Cardiovascular Association (CCA) Database-Chest Pain Center of 1,745,118 ACS patients admitted at 2,096 accredited Chest Pain Center between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2021. Patient characteristics, time delays, treatment, and outcomes were analyzed using descriptive analysis. Results: The final analysis included a total of 1,745,118 patients, 699,476 patients (40.1%) with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), 349,572 (20.0%) with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), and 696,070 (39.9%) with unstable angina (UA). Electrocardiogram (ECG) was conducted in 89.4% of the patients within 10 min after first medical contact. For STEMI patients, the median door-to-wire crossing time was 72.1 (53.1 to 91.9) min and the median first medical contact-to-needle time was 32.3 (23.8 to 58.6) min. In-hospital mortality was 2.0% in the overall analysis, 3.6% for STEMI, 2.1% for NSTEMI, and 0.3% for UA. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was conducted in 62.8% of STEMI patients, with increasing rate in grade I and II hospitals over the 6-year study period. Patients treated with thrombolysis had significantly higher mortality than those treated with PCI and thrombolysis combined with PCI. The development of Chest Pain Centers varied substantially across geographic regions. Conclusions: Based on CCA Database-Chest Pain Center, the current study provided an overall description of the clinical characteristics of ACS patients in China. The results on management pattern and in-hospital outcomes of STEMI patients identified important areas for further improvement in ACS patient management in China.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊最新文献
Retraction: Characteristics of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for chronically total occluded arteries: a single-center observational study in India. Association between cheese intake and risk of atherosclerosis: a two-sample Mendelian randomization phenome-wide study Technical challenges in small animal models for mimicking human ischemic cardiovascular diseases State-of-art review: intravascular imaging in percutaneous coronary interventions The Effect of Frailty on Independent Living After Surgery: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1