公共卫生部门新冠肺炎紧急情况下远程医疗的回顾:挑战和机遇

Ntibaneng Hunadi Maleka, W. Matli
{"title":"公共卫生部门新冠肺炎紧急情况下远程医疗的回顾:挑战和机遇","authors":"Ntibaneng Hunadi Maleka, W. Matli","doi":"10.1108/jstpm-08-2021-0126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this study is to provide current state of knowledge on how the COVID-19 emergency situation necessitated the behaviour influencing use and acceptance of telehealth. This study interlinks the health belief model (HBM) and the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) to highlight the challenges and opportunities as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic in the public health sector.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study used three online databases (Emerald publishing, Science Direct and Taylor and Francis) that enabled the authors to access electronic journal articles. Search strategy was used to extract articles based on the relevance of this study.\n\n\nFindings\nThe key findings from this study suggested that the COVID-19 emergency forced health-care workers and their patients to rapidly use and rely on telehealth to reduce the rate of COVID-19 transmissions. The key benefits of telehealth use highlighted an expansive cost effective and convenient access to health-care services irrespective of geographical local and levels of physical impairment. Moreover, telehealth inhibited in person human interaction, which was perceived as impersonal and not ideal for new patient consultations. The barriers outweighed the benefits; as a result, it is unlikely that there will be a wide use of telehealth beyond the COVID-19 emergency situation.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe research findings are limited to discussions drawn from available secondary data. The criteria within telehealth for policymakers to note the technology acceptance and use for both health-care and outpatient stakeholders and their health seeking behaviour. Health-care sectors (private and public) and government need to understand enablers of effective telehealth in policymaking to ease the barriers during an emergency situation like a pandemic.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study contributes to the emerging literature on how COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted and accelerated telehealth by extending both the UTAUT and HBM theories. This study is expected to contribute and expand literature on telehealth during emergency situations, given the novice nature of COVID-19 and limited literature surrounding it.\n","PeriodicalId":45751,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A review of telehealth during the COVID-19 emergency situation in the public health sector: challenges and opportunities\",\"authors\":\"Ntibaneng Hunadi Maleka, W. Matli\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jstpm-08-2021-0126\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThe purpose of this study is to provide current state of knowledge on how the COVID-19 emergency situation necessitated the behaviour influencing use and acceptance of telehealth. This study interlinks the health belief model (HBM) and the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) to highlight the challenges and opportunities as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic in the public health sector.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThis study used three online databases (Emerald publishing, Science Direct and Taylor and Francis) that enabled the authors to access electronic journal articles. Search strategy was used to extract articles based on the relevance of this study.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe key findings from this study suggested that the COVID-19 emergency forced health-care workers and their patients to rapidly use and rely on telehealth to reduce the rate of COVID-19 transmissions. The key benefits of telehealth use highlighted an expansive cost effective and convenient access to health-care services irrespective of geographical local and levels of physical impairment. Moreover, telehealth inhibited in person human interaction, which was perceived as impersonal and not ideal for new patient consultations. The barriers outweighed the benefits; as a result, it is unlikely that there will be a wide use of telehealth beyond the COVID-19 emergency situation.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nThe research findings are limited to discussions drawn from available secondary data. The criteria within telehealth for policymakers to note the technology acceptance and use for both health-care and outpatient stakeholders and their health seeking behaviour. Health-care sectors (private and public) and government need to understand enablers of effective telehealth in policymaking to ease the barriers during an emergency situation like a pandemic.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis study contributes to the emerging literature on how COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted and accelerated telehealth by extending both the UTAUT and HBM theories. This study is expected to contribute and expand literature on telehealth during emergency situations, given the novice nature of COVID-19 and limited literature surrounding it.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":45751,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jstpm-08-2021-0126\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jstpm-08-2021-0126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

目的本研究的目的是提供关于新冠肺炎紧急情况如何需要影响远程医疗的使用和接受的行为的最新知识。本研究将健康信念模型(HBM)和接受和使用技术的统一理论(UTAUT)联系起来,以强调新冠肺炎大流行在公共卫生部门带来的挑战和机遇。设计/方法论/方法这项研究使用了三个在线数据库(Emerald出版社、Science Direct和Taylor and Francis),使作者能够访问电子期刊文章。根据本研究的相关性,采用搜索策略提取文章。研究结果这项研究的关键发现表明,新冠肺炎紧急情况迫使医护人员及其患者迅速使用并依赖远程医疗来降低新冠肺炎的传播率。远程医疗的主要好处突出表明,无论当地地理位置和身体损伤程度如何,都可以广泛、经济高效、方便地获得医疗服务。此外,远程医疗抑制了人与人之间的互动,这被认为是非个人的,不适合新患者咨询。障碍大于好处;因此,在新冠肺炎紧急情况之外,远程医疗不太可能得到广泛使用。实际含义研究结果仅限于从现有的二次数据中进行的讨论。远程医疗中的标准是让决策者注意到医疗保健和门诊利益相关者对技术的接受和使用以及他们寻求健康的行为。医疗保健部门(私营和公共部门)和政府需要了解政策制定中有效远程医疗的推动者,以缓解疫情等紧急情况下的障碍。原创性/价值本研究通过扩展UTAUT和HBM理论,为新冠肺炎大流行如何扰乱和加速远程医疗的新兴文献做出了贡献。鉴于新冠肺炎的新手性质及其相关文献的有限性,这项研究有望对紧急情况下远程医疗的文献做出贡献和扩展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A review of telehealth during the COVID-19 emergency situation in the public health sector: challenges and opportunities
Purpose The purpose of this study is to provide current state of knowledge on how the COVID-19 emergency situation necessitated the behaviour influencing use and acceptance of telehealth. This study interlinks the health belief model (HBM) and the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) to highlight the challenges and opportunities as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic in the public health sector. Design/methodology/approach This study used three online databases (Emerald publishing, Science Direct and Taylor and Francis) that enabled the authors to access electronic journal articles. Search strategy was used to extract articles based on the relevance of this study. Findings The key findings from this study suggested that the COVID-19 emergency forced health-care workers and their patients to rapidly use and rely on telehealth to reduce the rate of COVID-19 transmissions. The key benefits of telehealth use highlighted an expansive cost effective and convenient access to health-care services irrespective of geographical local and levels of physical impairment. Moreover, telehealth inhibited in person human interaction, which was perceived as impersonal and not ideal for new patient consultations. The barriers outweighed the benefits; as a result, it is unlikely that there will be a wide use of telehealth beyond the COVID-19 emergency situation. Practical implications The research findings are limited to discussions drawn from available secondary data. The criteria within telehealth for policymakers to note the technology acceptance and use for both health-care and outpatient stakeholders and their health seeking behaviour. Health-care sectors (private and public) and government need to understand enablers of effective telehealth in policymaking to ease the barriers during an emergency situation like a pandemic. Originality/value This study contributes to the emerging literature on how COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted and accelerated telehealth by extending both the UTAUT and HBM theories. This study is expected to contribute and expand literature on telehealth during emergency situations, given the novice nature of COVID-19 and limited literature surrounding it.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
57
期刊最新文献
Editorial: “Digital transformation, innovation and competitiveness: some insights from Asia” Mathematical optimization of the sustainable gasoline supply chain: systematic literature review Exploring prospects of blockchain and fintech: using SLR approach Factors affecting the adoption of mobile payment services during the COVID-19 pandemic: an application of extended UTAUT2 model Developing entrepreneurship skills in scientific academia: best practices from India and Japan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1