聚焦超声介导的血脑屏障打开通过脑巨噬细胞再分布促进神经免疫调节

A. Kline-Schoder, R. Noel, H. Phatnani, V. Menon, E. Konofagou
{"title":"聚焦超声介导的血脑屏障打开通过脑巨噬细胞再分布促进神经免疫调节","authors":"A. Kline-Schoder, R. Noel, H. Phatnani, V. Menon, E. Konofagou","doi":"10.3390/neuroglia4020010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Neuroimmunomodulation is a promising form of drug-free treatment for neurological diseases ranging from Alzheimer’s disease to depression. The evidence supporting the efficacy of focused ultrasound (FUS) neuroimmunomodulation is encouraging; however, the method has yet to be standardized, and its mechanism remains poorly understood. Methods of FUS neuroimmunomodulation can be categorized into three paradigms based on the parameters used. In the first paradigm, focused ultrasound blood–brain barrier opening (FUS-BBBO) combines FUS with microbubbles (MB) to transiently and safely induce BBB opening. In the second paradigm, focused ultrasound neuromodulation (FUS-N) harnesses the acoustic effects of FUS alone (without MB). In the third paradigm, focused ultrasound with microbubbles without BBBO (FUS + MB) combines MB with FUS below the BBBO pressure threshold—harnessing the mechanical effects of FUS without opening the barrier. Due to the recent evidence of brain macrophage modulation in response to FUS-BBBO, we provide the first direct comparison of brain macrophage modulation between all three paradigms both in the presence and absence of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathology. Flow cytometry and single-cell sequencing are employed to identify FUS-BBBO as the FUS paradigm, which maximizes brain macrophage modulation, including an increase in the population of neuroprotective, disease-associated microglia and direct correlation between treatment cavitation dose and brain macrophage phagocytosis. Next, we combine spatial and single-cell transcriptomics with immunohistochemical validation to provide the first characterization of brain macrophage distribution in response to FUS-BBBO. Given their relevance within neurodegeneration and perturbation response, we emphasize the analysis of three brain macrophage populations—disease- and interferon-associated microglia and central-nervous-system-associated macrophages. We find and validate the redistribution of each population with an overall trend toward increased interaction with the brain–cerebrospinal fluid barrier (BCSFB) after FUS-BBBO, an effect that is found to be more pronounced in the presence of disease pathology. This study addresses the prior lack of FUS neuroimmunomodulation paradigm optimization and mechanism characterization, identifying that FUS-BBBO best modulates brain macrophage response via complex redistribution.","PeriodicalId":74275,"journal":{"name":"Neuroglia (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Focused Ultrasound-Mediated Blood–Brain Barrier Opening Best Promotes Neuroimmunomodulation through Brain Macrophage Redistribution\",\"authors\":\"A. Kline-Schoder, R. Noel, H. Phatnani, V. Menon, E. Konofagou\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/neuroglia4020010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Neuroimmunomodulation is a promising form of drug-free treatment for neurological diseases ranging from Alzheimer’s disease to depression. The evidence supporting the efficacy of focused ultrasound (FUS) neuroimmunomodulation is encouraging; however, the method has yet to be standardized, and its mechanism remains poorly understood. Methods of FUS neuroimmunomodulation can be categorized into three paradigms based on the parameters used. In the first paradigm, focused ultrasound blood–brain barrier opening (FUS-BBBO) combines FUS with microbubbles (MB) to transiently and safely induce BBB opening. In the second paradigm, focused ultrasound neuromodulation (FUS-N) harnesses the acoustic effects of FUS alone (without MB). In the third paradigm, focused ultrasound with microbubbles without BBBO (FUS + MB) combines MB with FUS below the BBBO pressure threshold—harnessing the mechanical effects of FUS without opening the barrier. Due to the recent evidence of brain macrophage modulation in response to FUS-BBBO, we provide the first direct comparison of brain macrophage modulation between all three paradigms both in the presence and absence of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathology. Flow cytometry and single-cell sequencing are employed to identify FUS-BBBO as the FUS paradigm, which maximizes brain macrophage modulation, including an increase in the population of neuroprotective, disease-associated microglia and direct correlation between treatment cavitation dose and brain macrophage phagocytosis. Next, we combine spatial and single-cell transcriptomics with immunohistochemical validation to provide the first characterization of brain macrophage distribution in response to FUS-BBBO. Given their relevance within neurodegeneration and perturbation response, we emphasize the analysis of three brain macrophage populations—disease- and interferon-associated microglia and central-nervous-system-associated macrophages. We find and validate the redistribution of each population with an overall trend toward increased interaction with the brain–cerebrospinal fluid barrier (BCSFB) after FUS-BBBO, an effect that is found to be more pronounced in the presence of disease pathology. This study addresses the prior lack of FUS neuroimmunomodulation paradigm optimization and mechanism characterization, identifying that FUS-BBBO best modulates brain macrophage response via complex redistribution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74275,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuroglia (Basel, Switzerland)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuroglia (Basel, Switzerland)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/neuroglia4020010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroglia (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/neuroglia4020010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

神经免疫调节是一种很有前途的无药物治疗神经系统疾病的形式,从阿尔茨海默病到抑郁症。支持聚焦超声(FUS)神经免疫调节效果的证据是令人鼓舞的;然而,该方法尚未标准化,其机制仍然知之甚少。基于使用的参数,FUS神经免疫调节方法可分为三种范式。在第一种模式中,聚焦超声血脑屏障打开(FUS- bbbo)结合FUS和微泡(MB)来短暂和安全地诱导血脑屏障打开。在第二种模式中,聚焦超声神经调节(FUS- n)仅利用FUS的声学效应(不含MB)。在第三种模式中,无BBBO的微泡聚焦超声(FUS + MB)将MB与BBBO压力阈值以下的FUS结合在一起,利用FUS的机械效应而不打开屏障。由于最近有证据表明脑巨噬细胞调节对FUS-BBBO的反应,我们提供了在存在和不存在阿尔茨海默病(AD)病理的情况下,所有三种范式之间的脑巨噬细胞调节的首次直接比较。流式细胞术和单细胞测序鉴定FUS- bbbo为FUS模式,其最大限度地调节脑巨噬细胞,包括增加神经保护、疾病相关小胶质细胞的数量,以及治疗空化剂量与脑巨噬细胞吞噬的直接相关性。接下来,我们将空间和单细胞转录组学与免疫组织化学验证相结合,首次提供了FUS-BBBO对脑巨噬细胞分布的反应。鉴于它们在神经变性和扰动反应中的相关性,我们强调分析三种脑巨噬细胞群-疾病和干扰素相关的小胶质细胞和中枢神经系统相关的巨噬细胞。我们发现并验证了每个人群在FUS-BBBO后与脑-脑脊液屏障(BCSFB)相互作用增加的总体趋势,这种影响在存在疾病病理的情况下更为明显。本研究解决了先前缺乏FUS神经免疫调节模式优化和机制表征的问题,确定FUS- bbbo通过复杂的再分配来调节脑巨噬细胞反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Focused Ultrasound-Mediated Blood–Brain Barrier Opening Best Promotes Neuroimmunomodulation through Brain Macrophage Redistribution
Neuroimmunomodulation is a promising form of drug-free treatment for neurological diseases ranging from Alzheimer’s disease to depression. The evidence supporting the efficacy of focused ultrasound (FUS) neuroimmunomodulation is encouraging; however, the method has yet to be standardized, and its mechanism remains poorly understood. Methods of FUS neuroimmunomodulation can be categorized into three paradigms based on the parameters used. In the first paradigm, focused ultrasound blood–brain barrier opening (FUS-BBBO) combines FUS with microbubbles (MB) to transiently and safely induce BBB opening. In the second paradigm, focused ultrasound neuromodulation (FUS-N) harnesses the acoustic effects of FUS alone (without MB). In the third paradigm, focused ultrasound with microbubbles without BBBO (FUS + MB) combines MB with FUS below the BBBO pressure threshold—harnessing the mechanical effects of FUS without opening the barrier. Due to the recent evidence of brain macrophage modulation in response to FUS-BBBO, we provide the first direct comparison of brain macrophage modulation between all three paradigms both in the presence and absence of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathology. Flow cytometry and single-cell sequencing are employed to identify FUS-BBBO as the FUS paradigm, which maximizes brain macrophage modulation, including an increase in the population of neuroprotective, disease-associated microglia and direct correlation between treatment cavitation dose and brain macrophage phagocytosis. Next, we combine spatial and single-cell transcriptomics with immunohistochemical validation to provide the first characterization of brain macrophage distribution in response to FUS-BBBO. Given their relevance within neurodegeneration and perturbation response, we emphasize the analysis of three brain macrophage populations—disease- and interferon-associated microglia and central-nervous-system-associated macrophages. We find and validate the redistribution of each population with an overall trend toward increased interaction with the brain–cerebrospinal fluid barrier (BCSFB) after FUS-BBBO, an effect that is found to be more pronounced in the presence of disease pathology. This study addresses the prior lack of FUS neuroimmunomodulation paradigm optimization and mechanism characterization, identifying that FUS-BBBO best modulates brain macrophage response via complex redistribution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of the Transduction Capacity of AAV5 and AAV PHP.eB Serotypes in Hippocampus Astroglia The Signaling of Neuregulin-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptors and Its Impact on the Nervous System GABAA-ρ Receptors in the CNS: Their Functional, Pharmacological, and Structural Properties in Neurons and Astroglia Combination of Engineered Expression of Polysialic Acid on Transplanted Schwann Cells and in Injured Rat Spinal Cord Promotes Significant Axonal Growth and Functional Recovery Glucose Transporter-2 Regulation of Male versus Female Hypothalamic Astrocyte MAPK Expression and Activation: Impact of Glucose.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1