世界掠影

Q1 Social Sciences Capitalism, Nature, Socialism Pub Date : 2022-07-03 DOI:10.1080/10455752.2022.2126129
S. Fassbinder
{"title":"世界掠影","authors":"S. Fassbinder","doi":"10.1080/10455752.2022.2126129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Future is Degrowth recommends practical proposals for degrowth while at the same time suggesting what Ernst Bloch, of all writers dead or living, called a “concrete utopia.” Bloch was a visionary whose masterwork The Principle of Hope defended the notion that “everyone lives in the future” ([1956] 1998, 4). One need not agree with everything Schmelzer et al. say to be impressed that they quote him. This is an expanded edition of a book written by three German authors in 2019, with the help of British doctoral candidate Aaron Vansintjan, and of European academic associations and reading groups. Its aim is “building a future for all beyond capitalism” (ix). Its starting point is that “it is feasible to live well without growth and to make society more just, democratic, and truly prosperous on the way” (4). This is not a Green New Deal proposal, though it does argue that “while Green New Deal proposals tend to emphasize this investment push and the growth of everything sustainable, degrowth also and at least as rigorously puts the focus on the many things that will have to go” (9). The term “degrowth” stands in opposition to the term “growth,”which is generally taken to mean economic growth, although in an early chapter the connotations of “growth,” understood broadly, are explored:","PeriodicalId":39549,"journal":{"name":"Capitalism, Nature, Socialism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Glimpse of a World Beyond\",\"authors\":\"S. Fassbinder\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10455752.2022.2126129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Future is Degrowth recommends practical proposals for degrowth while at the same time suggesting what Ernst Bloch, of all writers dead or living, called a “concrete utopia.” Bloch was a visionary whose masterwork The Principle of Hope defended the notion that “everyone lives in the future” ([1956] 1998, 4). One need not agree with everything Schmelzer et al. say to be impressed that they quote him. This is an expanded edition of a book written by three German authors in 2019, with the help of British doctoral candidate Aaron Vansintjan, and of European academic associations and reading groups. Its aim is “building a future for all beyond capitalism” (ix). Its starting point is that “it is feasible to live well without growth and to make society more just, democratic, and truly prosperous on the way” (4). This is not a Green New Deal proposal, though it does argue that “while Green New Deal proposals tend to emphasize this investment push and the growth of everything sustainable, degrowth also and at least as rigorously puts the focus on the many things that will have to go” (9). The term “degrowth” stands in opposition to the term “growth,”which is generally taken to mean economic growth, although in an early chapter the connotations of “growth,” understood broadly, are explored:\",\"PeriodicalId\":39549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Capitalism, Nature, Socialism\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Capitalism, Nature, Socialism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10455752.2022.2126129\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Capitalism, Nature, Socialism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10455752.2022.2126129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《未来是去增长》为去增长提出了切实可行的建议,同时也提出了恩斯特·布洛赫(Ernst Bloch)在所有已故或在世的作家中所说的“具体的乌托邦”。布洛赫是一个有远见的人,他的杰作《希望的原则》捍卫了“每个人都生活在未来”的概念([1956]1998,4)。人们不必同意施梅尔策等人所说的一切,就会对他们引用他的话印象深刻。这是2019年由三位德国作家在英国博士候选人Aaron Vansintjan以及欧洲学术协会和阅读团体的帮助下撰写的一本书的扩充版。它的目标是“为所有人建立一个超越资本主义的未来”(ix)。它的出发点是“在没有增长的情况下生活得很好是可行的,并在此过程中使社会更加公正、民主和真正繁荣”(4)。这不是一个绿色新政提案,尽管它确实认为“虽然绿色新政提案倾向于强调这种投资推动和一切可持续发展的增长,但它并不是一个绿色新政提案。”“去增长”也至少同样严格地把焦点放在许多将不得不消失的事情上”(9)。“去增长”一词与“增长”一词对立,“增长”一词通常被认为是指经济增长,尽管在前一章中,“增长”的内涵被广泛理解,并进行了探讨:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Glimpse of a World Beyond
The Future is Degrowth recommends practical proposals for degrowth while at the same time suggesting what Ernst Bloch, of all writers dead or living, called a “concrete utopia.” Bloch was a visionary whose masterwork The Principle of Hope defended the notion that “everyone lives in the future” ([1956] 1998, 4). One need not agree with everything Schmelzer et al. say to be impressed that they quote him. This is an expanded edition of a book written by three German authors in 2019, with the help of British doctoral candidate Aaron Vansintjan, and of European academic associations and reading groups. Its aim is “building a future for all beyond capitalism” (ix). Its starting point is that “it is feasible to live well without growth and to make society more just, democratic, and truly prosperous on the way” (4). This is not a Green New Deal proposal, though it does argue that “while Green New Deal proposals tend to emphasize this investment push and the growth of everything sustainable, degrowth also and at least as rigorously puts the focus on the many things that will have to go” (9). The term “degrowth” stands in opposition to the term “growth,”which is generally taken to mean economic growth, although in an early chapter the connotations of “growth,” understood broadly, are explored:
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Capitalism, Nature, Socialism
Capitalism, Nature, Socialism Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: CNS is a journal of ecosocialism. We welcome submissions on red-green politics and the anti-globalization movement; environmental history; workplace labor struggles; land/community struggles; political economy of ecology; and other themes in political ecology. CNS especially wants to join (relate) discourses on labor, feminist, and environmental movements, and theories of political ecology and radical democracy. Works on ecology and socialism are particularly welcome.
期刊最新文献
The Political Implications of Unequal Exchange: Towards a Common Agenda for Global Social Movements State of Exception, Necropolitics, and Puerto Rico: Naturalizing Disaster and Naturalizing Difference The Quest for Revolutionary Love: John P. Clark Interviews Javier Sethness about Queer Tolstoy Beyond Trash and Garbage: Shifting Perspectives on Discard Discard studies: wasting, systems, and power , Max Liboiron and Josh Lepawsky, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 2022, 212 pages, $30 (paperback), ISBN: 9780262543651 Rooted-South Feminisms: Disobedient Epistemologies and Transformative Politics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1