WRF MRI‐4VAR对2016年8月极端北极气旋的改进预测

IF 3 3区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society Pub Date : 2023-09-04 DOI:10.1002/qj.4569
J. Ban, Zhiquan Liu, D. Bromwich, L. Bai
{"title":"WRF MRI‐4VAR对2016年8月极端北极气旋的改进预测","authors":"J. Ban, Zhiquan Liu, D. Bromwich, L. Bai","doi":"10.1002/qj.4569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cycling data assimilation and forecast experiments in August 2016 together with a case study of an intense Arctic Cyclone (AC16) are performed using the community Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model's Data Assimilation system (WRFDA). Three‐Dimensional Variational (3DVAR) and Multi‐Resolution Incremental Four‐Dimensional Variational (MRI‐4DVAR) data assimilation along with Polar WRF are applied to evaluate MRI‐4DVAR performance during a 20‐day cycling run, to investigate the impacts of initial conditions on the forecast skill of AC16, and to identify the factors impacting AC16's predictability. Six‐hourly continuous cycling experiments started from 1 August 2016 with 7‐day free forecasts initialized at each 0000 UTC. The results from departure statistics and forecast verification throughout the 20‐day period indicate the robustness and reliability of MRI‐4DVAR. For the AC16 case study, multiple processes, including merging of arctic cyclones, merging of vortices, vertical coupling between low‐level and upper‐level circulations, baroclinic processes and jet stream forcing, contributed to its generation and development. Compared to the initial conditions produced by 4DVAR, 3DVAR produced amplified vortices, stronger baroclinic instability, intensified upper‐level jet streams and a stronger low‐level frontal zone. These factors caused early strengthening of the dominant Arctic Cyclone and led to the early coupling between the low‐level Arctic cyclone and upper‐level vortices that resulted in the over development of AC16 in 3DVAR. For MRI‐4DVAR, the successful prediction of AC16 is likely due primarily to the more accurate simulation of upper‐level atmospheric fields, that was facilitated by better satellite radiance assimilation resulting from MRI‐4DVAR producing a balanced initial model state.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":49646,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improved Forecasting of the Extreme Arctic Cyclone in August 2016 with WRF MRI‐4DVAR\",\"authors\":\"J. Ban, Zhiquan Liu, D. Bromwich, L. Bai\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/qj.4569\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cycling data assimilation and forecast experiments in August 2016 together with a case study of an intense Arctic Cyclone (AC16) are performed using the community Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model's Data Assimilation system (WRFDA). Three‐Dimensional Variational (3DVAR) and Multi‐Resolution Incremental Four‐Dimensional Variational (MRI‐4DVAR) data assimilation along with Polar WRF are applied to evaluate MRI‐4DVAR performance during a 20‐day cycling run, to investigate the impacts of initial conditions on the forecast skill of AC16, and to identify the factors impacting AC16's predictability. Six‐hourly continuous cycling experiments started from 1 August 2016 with 7‐day free forecasts initialized at each 0000 UTC. The results from departure statistics and forecast verification throughout the 20‐day period indicate the robustness and reliability of MRI‐4DVAR. For the AC16 case study, multiple processes, including merging of arctic cyclones, merging of vortices, vertical coupling between low‐level and upper‐level circulations, baroclinic processes and jet stream forcing, contributed to its generation and development. Compared to the initial conditions produced by 4DVAR, 3DVAR produced amplified vortices, stronger baroclinic instability, intensified upper‐level jet streams and a stronger low‐level frontal zone. These factors caused early strengthening of the dominant Arctic Cyclone and led to the early coupling between the low‐level Arctic cyclone and upper‐level vortices that resulted in the over development of AC16 in 3DVAR. For MRI‐4DVAR, the successful prediction of AC16 is likely due primarily to the more accurate simulation of upper‐level atmospheric fields, that was facilitated by better satellite radiance assimilation resulting from MRI‐4DVAR producing a balanced initial model state.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4569\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4569","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

利用社区天气研究与预报(WRF)模型的数据同化系统(WRFDA),进行了2016年8月的循环数据同化和预测实验,以及一次强烈的北极气旋(AC16)的案例研究。三维变分(3DVAR)和多分辨率增量四维变分(MRI‐4DVAR)数据同化以及极地WRF应用于评估MRI‐4DVAR在20天自行车赛中的表现,研究初始条件对AC16预测技能的影响,并确定影响AC16可预测性的因素。从2016年8月1日开始进行六小时连续循环实验,每0000 UTC初始化7天免费预报。20天内的出发统计和预测验证结果表明了MRI‐4VAR的稳健性和可靠性。在AC16案例研究中,多种过程,包括北极气旋的合并、涡旋的合并、低层和高层环流之间的垂直耦合、斜压过程和急流强迫,都有助于其产生和发展。与4DVAR产生的初始条件相比,3DVAR产生了放大的涡流、更强的斜压不稳定性、更强的高层急流和更强的低层锋区。这些因素导致了占主导地位的北极气旋的早期增强,并导致低层北极气旋和高层涡旋之间的早期耦合,导致3DVAR中AC16的过度发展。对于MRI‐4DVAR,AC16的成功预测可能主要是由于对高层大气场的更准确模拟,这得益于MRI‐4DVAR产生平衡的初始模型状态所产生的更好的卫星辐射同化。这篇文章受版权保护。保留所有权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Improved Forecasting of the Extreme Arctic Cyclone in August 2016 with WRF MRI‐4DVAR
Cycling data assimilation and forecast experiments in August 2016 together with a case study of an intense Arctic Cyclone (AC16) are performed using the community Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model's Data Assimilation system (WRFDA). Three‐Dimensional Variational (3DVAR) and Multi‐Resolution Incremental Four‐Dimensional Variational (MRI‐4DVAR) data assimilation along with Polar WRF are applied to evaluate MRI‐4DVAR performance during a 20‐day cycling run, to investigate the impacts of initial conditions on the forecast skill of AC16, and to identify the factors impacting AC16's predictability. Six‐hourly continuous cycling experiments started from 1 August 2016 with 7‐day free forecasts initialized at each 0000 UTC. The results from departure statistics and forecast verification throughout the 20‐day period indicate the robustness and reliability of MRI‐4DVAR. For the AC16 case study, multiple processes, including merging of arctic cyclones, merging of vortices, vertical coupling between low‐level and upper‐level circulations, baroclinic processes and jet stream forcing, contributed to its generation and development. Compared to the initial conditions produced by 4DVAR, 3DVAR produced amplified vortices, stronger baroclinic instability, intensified upper‐level jet streams and a stronger low‐level frontal zone. These factors caused early strengthening of the dominant Arctic Cyclone and led to the early coupling between the low‐level Arctic cyclone and upper‐level vortices that resulted in the over development of AC16 in 3DVAR. For MRI‐4DVAR, the successful prediction of AC16 is likely due primarily to the more accurate simulation of upper‐level atmospheric fields, that was facilitated by better satellite radiance assimilation resulting from MRI‐4DVAR producing a balanced initial model state.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.80
自引率
4.50%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society is a journal published by the Royal Meteorological Society. It aims to communicate and document new research in the atmospheric sciences and related fields. The journal is considered one of the leading publications in meteorology worldwide. It accepts articles, comprehensive review articles, and comments on published papers. It is published eight times a year, with additional special issues. The Quarterly Journal has a wide readership of scientists in the atmospheric and related fields. It is indexed and abstracted in various databases, including Advanced Polymers Abstracts, Agricultural Engineering Abstracts, CAB Abstracts, CABDirect, COMPENDEX, CSA Civil Engineering Abstracts, Earthquake Engineering Abstracts, Engineered Materials Abstracts, Science Citation Index, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and more.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Aeolus horizontal line-of-sight wind observations on tropical cyclone forecasting in a global numerical weather prediction system A numerical study of ocean surface layer response to atmospheric shallow convection: impact of cloud shading, rain and cold pool Deterministic and Stochastic Tendency Adjustments Derived from Data Assimilation and Nudging Seasonal Variations of Gravity Wave Parameters over the Northern and Southern Tibetan Plateau Radiosonde Observatory Microphysical mechanisms of wintertime postfrontal precipitation enhancement over the Australian Snowy Mountains
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1