英语名词短语倾向于最小化依赖距离吗?

IF 0.4 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Australian Journal of Linguistics Pub Date : 2020-04-02 DOI:10.1080/07268602.2020.1789552
J. Lu, Haitao Liu
{"title":"英语名词短语倾向于最小化依赖距离吗?","authors":"J. Lu, Haitao Liu","doi":"10.1080/07268602.2020.1789552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Many studies have shown that, owing to the constraint of working memory capacity, language users prefer shorter dependency distances. However, these studies, which are all based on dependency distances in sentences or texts, leave the question unanswered: does noun phrase structure also demonstrate the tendency of dependency distance minimization? To answer this question, the article, based on a self-annotated English corpus, was carried out to probe the dependency distance in noun phrases between heads and their pre- and post- modifiers. The results show that the dependency distance between pre-modifiers and heads is much shorter than that between post-modifiers and heads. This finding suggests that noun phrases also show the tendency of dependency distance minimization, although they present a much longer mean dependency distance than sentences.","PeriodicalId":44988,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Linguistics","volume":"40 1","pages":"246 - 262"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/07268602.2020.1789552","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do English noun phrases tend to minimize dependency distance?\",\"authors\":\"J. Lu, Haitao Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07268602.2020.1789552\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Many studies have shown that, owing to the constraint of working memory capacity, language users prefer shorter dependency distances. However, these studies, which are all based on dependency distances in sentences or texts, leave the question unanswered: does noun phrase structure also demonstrate the tendency of dependency distance minimization? To answer this question, the article, based on a self-annotated English corpus, was carried out to probe the dependency distance in noun phrases between heads and their pre- and post- modifiers. The results show that the dependency distance between pre-modifiers and heads is much shorter than that between post-modifiers and heads. This finding suggests that noun phrases also show the tendency of dependency distance minimization, although they present a much longer mean dependency distance than sentences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44988,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Linguistics\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"246 - 262\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/07268602.2020.1789552\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2020.1789552\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2020.1789552","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

许多研究表明,由于工作记忆容量的限制,语言使用者倾向于较短的依赖距离。然而,这些研究都是基于句子或文本中的依赖距离,没有回答一个问题:名词短语结构是否也表现出依赖距离最小化的趋势?为了回答这一问题,本文基于一个自注释的英语语料库,对名词短语中头部与其前后修饰语之间的依赖距离进行了探讨。结果表明:前修饰语与词头之间的依赖距离远小于后修饰语与词头之间的依赖距离。这一发现表明,名词短语也表现出依赖距离最小化的趋势,尽管它们的平均依赖距离比句子长得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Do English noun phrases tend to minimize dependency distance?
ABSTRACT Many studies have shown that, owing to the constraint of working memory capacity, language users prefer shorter dependency distances. However, these studies, which are all based on dependency distances in sentences or texts, leave the question unanswered: does noun phrase structure also demonstrate the tendency of dependency distance minimization? To answer this question, the article, based on a self-annotated English corpus, was carried out to probe the dependency distance in noun phrases between heads and their pre- and post- modifiers. The results show that the dependency distance between pre-modifiers and heads is much shorter than that between post-modifiers and heads. This finding suggests that noun phrases also show the tendency of dependency distance minimization, although they present a much longer mean dependency distance than sentences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
Introduction: Language corpora in Australia The GeSCA repository: Gesture and Sign Corpus of Australia Building a searchable online corpus of Australian and New Zealand aligned speech The longitudinal corpus of language acquisition, maintenance and contact: Warlpiri & Light Warlpiri Analyzing online public discourse in Australia: Australian Twittersphere and NewsTalk corpora
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1