地理上的撤退和象征性的前进?

IF 0.4 4区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Language Problems & Language Planning Pub Date : 2021-11-24 DOI:10.1075/lplp.00079.coa
J. Coakley
{"title":"地理上的撤退和象征性的前进?","authors":"J. Coakley","doi":"10.1075/lplp.00079.coa","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Language policy in the Republic of Ireland has an unusual starting point: the geographical base of the Irish\n language is very weak and territorially dispersed, yet the constitutional status of the language is extremely strong. The article\n explores this paradox. It sets Irish language policy in two contexts: that of successful nationalist movements mainly in Central\n and Eastern Europe in the early twentieth century, and that of the struggling Celtic languages of Western Europe. It explores the\n evolution of the language and its weakening demographic status since the nineteenth century, noting that while its demographic\n weakness mirrors that of the other Celtic languages, its constitutional entrenchment resembles that of the national languages of\n Central and East European states. It attempts to explain this by suggesting that the language has played a marginal role in\n nationalist mobilisation; the language served as a symbol of a specific cultural heritage rather than as the vital lingua franca\n of the community. The central role of the language in nationalist ideology, however, failed to address the reality of continuing\n decline in the Irish-speaking districts, notwithstanding the emergence of a sizeable population of ‘new speakers’ of the language\n outside these districts.","PeriodicalId":44345,"journal":{"name":"Language Problems & Language Planning","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Geographical retreat and symbolic advance?\",\"authors\":\"J. Coakley\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/lplp.00079.coa\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Language policy in the Republic of Ireland has an unusual starting point: the geographical base of the Irish\\n language is very weak and territorially dispersed, yet the constitutional status of the language is extremely strong. The article\\n explores this paradox. It sets Irish language policy in two contexts: that of successful nationalist movements mainly in Central\\n and Eastern Europe in the early twentieth century, and that of the struggling Celtic languages of Western Europe. It explores the\\n evolution of the language and its weakening demographic status since the nineteenth century, noting that while its demographic\\n weakness mirrors that of the other Celtic languages, its constitutional entrenchment resembles that of the national languages of\\n Central and East European states. It attempts to explain this by suggesting that the language has played a marginal role in\\n nationalist mobilisation; the language served as a symbol of a specific cultural heritage rather than as the vital lingua franca\\n of the community. The central role of the language in nationalist ideology, however, failed to address the reality of continuing\\n decline in the Irish-speaking districts, notwithstanding the emergence of a sizeable population of ‘new speakers’ of the language\\n outside these districts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44345,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language Problems & Language Planning\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language Problems & Language Planning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.00079.coa\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Problems & Language Planning","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.00079.coa","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

爱尔兰共和国的语言政策有一个不同寻常的起点:爱尔兰语的地理基础非常薄弱,地域分散,但该语言的宪法地位极其强大。这篇文章探讨了这个悖论。它将爱尔兰语政策设定在两个背景下:20世纪初主要在中欧和东欧成功的民族主义运动,以及西欧挣扎的凯尔特语。它探讨了自19世纪以来该语言的演变及其日益削弱的人口地位,指出尽管其人口弱点反映了其他凯尔特语言的弱点,但其宪法基础与中欧和东欧国家的民族语言相似。它试图通过暗示语言在民族主义动员中发挥了边缘作用来解释这一点;该语言是特定文化遗产的象征,而不是社区的重要通用语。然而,该语言在民族主义意识形态中的核心作用未能解决爱尔兰语地区持续衰落的现实,尽管在这些地区之外出现了大量的该语言的“新使用者”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Geographical retreat and symbolic advance?
Language policy in the Republic of Ireland has an unusual starting point: the geographical base of the Irish language is very weak and territorially dispersed, yet the constitutional status of the language is extremely strong. The article explores this paradox. It sets Irish language policy in two contexts: that of successful nationalist movements mainly in Central and Eastern Europe in the early twentieth century, and that of the struggling Celtic languages of Western Europe. It explores the evolution of the language and its weakening demographic status since the nineteenth century, noting that while its demographic weakness mirrors that of the other Celtic languages, its constitutional entrenchment resembles that of the national languages of Central and East European states. It attempts to explain this by suggesting that the language has played a marginal role in nationalist mobilisation; the language served as a symbol of a specific cultural heritage rather than as the vital lingua franca of the community. The central role of the language in nationalist ideology, however, failed to address the reality of continuing decline in the Irish-speaking districts, notwithstanding the emergence of a sizeable population of ‘new speakers’ of the language outside these districts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Language Problems and Language Planning is published in cooperation with the Center for Research and Documentation on World Language Problems. This international multi-lingual journal publishes articles primarily on political, sociological, and economic aspects of language and language use. It is especially concerned with relationships between and among language communities, particularly in international contexts, and in the adaptation, manipulation, and standardization of language for international use.
期刊最新文献
Review of Salomone (2022): The rise of English: Global politics and the power of language Review of Wright & Higgins (2021): Diversifying Family Language Policy Review of Faingold (2020): Language Rights and the Law in the European Union Translation policies in times of a pandemic Review of Barandovská-Frank (2020): Interlingvistiko. Enkonduko en la sciencon pri planlingvoj
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1