对所有人来说都是短期的好工作

IF 0.5 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE New Political Science Pub Date : 2022-10-02 DOI:10.1080/07393148.2022.2129924
Tom Malleson
{"title":"对所有人来说都是短期的好工作","authors":"Tom Malleson","doi":"10.1080/07393148.2022.2129924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper advances three arguments. First, current working-time patterns are destructive of justice, especially in terms of environmental sustainability, gender equality, and personal autonomy. Second, making fundamental progress towards these goals requires secure, quality, short-time work for all. This refers to an economic system that would guarantee everyone a decent, secure, existence at roughly 30 hours or less of market work, as well as actively discouraging longer hours. This discouragement should take the form of “soft” state policies as well as new cultural norms; it should not take “hard” forms of state violence. Third, liberal proceduralists are wrong to believe that individuals should be free from state regulation to simply choose the amount of work/leisure that they see fit, since doing so creates all kinds of harms for other people. In fact, the state should actively disincentivize long work hours in order to augment social justice.","PeriodicalId":46114,"journal":{"name":"New Political Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Good Short-Time Work for All\",\"authors\":\"Tom Malleson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07393148.2022.2129924\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This paper advances three arguments. First, current working-time patterns are destructive of justice, especially in terms of environmental sustainability, gender equality, and personal autonomy. Second, making fundamental progress towards these goals requires secure, quality, short-time work for all. This refers to an economic system that would guarantee everyone a decent, secure, existence at roughly 30 hours or less of market work, as well as actively discouraging longer hours. This discouragement should take the form of “soft” state policies as well as new cultural norms; it should not take “hard” forms of state violence. Third, liberal proceduralists are wrong to believe that individuals should be free from state regulation to simply choose the amount of work/leisure that they see fit, since doing so creates all kinds of harms for other people. In fact, the state should actively disincentivize long work hours in order to augment social justice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46114,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Political Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Political Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2022.2129924\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2022.2129924","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文提出了三个论点。首先,目前的工作时间模式破坏了正义,特别是在环境可持续性、性别平等和个人自主方面。第二,要在实现这些目标方面取得根本进展,就需要人人享有安全、高质量、短时间的工作。这指的是一种经济体系,它能保证每个人在大约30小时或更少的市场工作时间内过上体面、安全的生活,并积极阻止更长时间的工作。这种劝阻应该采取“软”国家政策和新文化规范的形式;它不应该采取“强硬”的国家暴力形式。第三,自由程序主义者错误地认为,个人应该不受国家监管,可以简单地选择他们认为合适的工作/休闲时间,因为这样做会给其他人带来各种伤害。事实上,为了增加社会公正,国家应该积极地抑制长时间工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Good Short-Time Work for All
Abstract This paper advances three arguments. First, current working-time patterns are destructive of justice, especially in terms of environmental sustainability, gender equality, and personal autonomy. Second, making fundamental progress towards these goals requires secure, quality, short-time work for all. This refers to an economic system that would guarantee everyone a decent, secure, existence at roughly 30 hours or less of market work, as well as actively discouraging longer hours. This discouragement should take the form of “soft” state policies as well as new cultural norms; it should not take “hard” forms of state violence. Third, liberal proceduralists are wrong to believe that individuals should be free from state regulation to simply choose the amount of work/leisure that they see fit, since doing so creates all kinds of harms for other people. In fact, the state should actively disincentivize long work hours in order to augment social justice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
New Political Science
New Political Science POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
53
期刊最新文献
Designing for Democracy: How to Build Community in Digital Environments Designing for Democracy: How to Build Community in Digital Environments , by Jennifer Forestal, New York: Oxford University Press, 2021, 232 pp., $30.99(softcover) ISBN: 978-0-197-56876-7. The Ends of Resistance: Making and Unmaking Democracy The Ends of Resistance: Making and Unmaking Democracy , by Alix Olson and Alex Zamalin, New York: Columbia University Press, 2024, 189 pp., $24.00 (paperback), ISBN: 978-0-2312-0499-6. Tears of Theory: International Relations as Storytelling Tears of Theory: International Relations as Storytelling , by Sungju Park-Kang, London: Rowman & Littlefield, 2022, 144 pp., $105.00 (hardcover), ISBN: 978-1-5381-6505-8. Evolving Prefigurative Politics in an Intentional Community: The Auroville Citizens’ Assembly Pilot Race, the Ballot, and Hegemony: What the Struggle over Immigrant Voting Teaches Us About Rightwing Mobilization in the U.S.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1