{"title":"关系感:“文学共产主义”、民主与公共","authors":"Michael Krimper","doi":"10.1080/13534645.2021.1896089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Jean-Luc Nancy wrote what is probably still his most well-known book, The Inoperative Community [La communaut e d esœuvr ee], over thirty years ago. It has not only been widely read and translated since its publication in 1986 but has prompted many other philosophers to contend with the ontological and political dimensions of community, notably Giorgio Agamben, Jacques Derrida, Roberto Esposito, and Achille Mbembe. From the mid 1980s onward, Nancy’s sustained deconstruction of community converged with postcolonial critiques of ethnonational identity and the state, as well as rearticulations of democracy no longer based on a politics of representation determined by fixed relations of common belonging and ownership. Furthermore, it resonates with an array of contemporary writing on assembly, queer antisociality, diaspora, blackness, and the commons, all of which interrogate the appropriative and possessive structures of relationality at the source of modern subjectivity. If this nexus of thought explores another way of being in relation with the other, then Nancy reminds us that those senses of being-in-common are already shared out in the ordinariness of everyday existence here and now.","PeriodicalId":46204,"journal":{"name":"Parallax","volume":"26 1","pages":"449 - 465"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13534645.2021.1896089","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Senses of Relation: ‘Literary Communism’, Democracy, and the Common\",\"authors\":\"Michael Krimper\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13534645.2021.1896089\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Jean-Luc Nancy wrote what is probably still his most well-known book, The Inoperative Community [La communaut e d esœuvr ee], over thirty years ago. It has not only been widely read and translated since its publication in 1986 but has prompted many other philosophers to contend with the ontological and political dimensions of community, notably Giorgio Agamben, Jacques Derrida, Roberto Esposito, and Achille Mbembe. From the mid 1980s onward, Nancy’s sustained deconstruction of community converged with postcolonial critiques of ethnonational identity and the state, as well as rearticulations of democracy no longer based on a politics of representation determined by fixed relations of common belonging and ownership. Furthermore, it resonates with an array of contemporary writing on assembly, queer antisociality, diaspora, blackness, and the commons, all of which interrogate the appropriative and possessive structures of relationality at the source of modern subjectivity. If this nexus of thought explores another way of being in relation with the other, then Nancy reminds us that those senses of being-in-common are already shared out in the ordinariness of everyday existence here and now.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46204,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Parallax\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"449 - 465\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13534645.2021.1896089\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Parallax\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13534645.2021.1896089\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CULTURAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parallax","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13534645.2021.1896089","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
Jean-Luc Nancy在三十多年前写了可能是他最著名的书《无效的社区》[La communaut e d esœuvr ee]。自1986年出版以来,它不仅被广泛阅读和翻译,而且促使许多其他哲学家与社区的本体论和政治维度进行斗争,特别是乔治·阿甘本、雅克·德里达、罗伯托·埃斯波西托和阿基利·姆本贝。从20世纪80年代中期开始,南希对社区的持续解构与后殖民时期对民族认同和国家的批评,以及不再基于由共同归属和所有权的固定关系决定的代表政治的民主的重新表述融合在一起。此外,它与一系列关于集会、酷儿反社会、散居、黑人和公地的当代写作产生了共鸣,所有这些都质疑了现代主体性来源的关系的占有和占有结构。如果这种思想联系探索了另一种与他人关系的方式,那么南希提醒我们,这些共同的感觉已经在这里和现在的日常生活中分享出来了。
Senses of Relation: ‘Literary Communism’, Democracy, and the Common
Jean-Luc Nancy wrote what is probably still his most well-known book, The Inoperative Community [La communaut e d esœuvr ee], over thirty years ago. It has not only been widely read and translated since its publication in 1986 but has prompted many other philosophers to contend with the ontological and political dimensions of community, notably Giorgio Agamben, Jacques Derrida, Roberto Esposito, and Achille Mbembe. From the mid 1980s onward, Nancy’s sustained deconstruction of community converged with postcolonial critiques of ethnonational identity and the state, as well as rearticulations of democracy no longer based on a politics of representation determined by fixed relations of common belonging and ownership. Furthermore, it resonates with an array of contemporary writing on assembly, queer antisociality, diaspora, blackness, and the commons, all of which interrogate the appropriative and possessive structures of relationality at the source of modern subjectivity. If this nexus of thought explores another way of being in relation with the other, then Nancy reminds us that those senses of being-in-common are already shared out in the ordinariness of everyday existence here and now.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1995, parallax has established an international reputation for bringing together outstanding new work in cultural studies, critical theory and philosophy. parallax publishes themed issues that aim to provoke exploratory, interdisciplinary thinking and response. Each issue of parallax provides a forum for a wide spectrum of perspectives on a topical question or concern. parallax will be of interest to those working in cultural studies, critical theory, cultural history, philosophy, gender studies, queer theory, post-colonial theory, English and comparative literature, aesthetics, art history and visual cultures.